A conceptual investigation of the ontological commensurability of spatial data infrastructures among different cultures

Humans think and communicate in very flexible and schematic ways, and a Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) for the Amazon and associated information system ontologies should reflect this flexibility and the adaptive nature of human cognition in order to achieve semantic interoperability. In this paper I offer a conceptual investigation of SDI and explore the nature of cultural schemas as expressions of indigenous ontologies and the challenges of semantic interoperability across cultures. Cultural schemas are, in essence, our ontologies, but they are markedly different than classical formal ontologies. They shape our ontological commitments to what exists in the world as well as the ways in which we approach and engage the world. And while they help structure our understanding of the world in which we are embedded, they are associative and flexible. They help to focus our attention to particular details of our experiences and give them salience, yet they cannot be simply reduced to a series of extracted features. They allow us to make meaning of the contextualized, cultural experience in which we are always immersed. An SDI is a shared social-technological-informational structure that, if it is to be useful and successful for sustainability in the Amazon, must incorporate and use indigenous cultural schemas. Indigenous communities must have the ability to contribute to the collection of geospatial data and their contributions recognized as legitimate forms of knowledge. In order for the SDI to work, it must recognize the larger cultural landscape to which cultural schemas can connect to the ready-to-hand elements of salient cultural experiences.

[1]  G. Bateson,et al.  Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity , 1979 .

[2]  Helen Watson-Verran,et al.  6 Science and Other Indigenous Knowledge Systems , 1995 .

[3]  Rupert Sheldrake,et al.  The Rebirth Of Nature , 1991 .

[4]  R. Rosaldo Culture & Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis , 1989 .

[5]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Language and landscape: a cross-linguistic perspective , 2008 .

[6]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  The Cultural Aspects of Sharing and Dynamic Partnerships Within an SDI Hierarchy , 2002 .

[7]  David M. Mark,et al.  Progress on Yindjibarndi Ethnophysiography , 2007, COSIT.

[8]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Play as the Way Out of the Newspeak-Tower of Babel Dilemma in Data Modeling , 2005, ICIS.

[9]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  C. Christensen What are the Categories in Sein und Zeit? Brandom on Heidegger on Zuhandenheit , 2007 .

[11]  W. Freeman The physiology of perception. , 1991, Scientific American.

[12]  F. Fonseca,et al.  Networks of innovation and the establishment of a spatial data infrastructure in Brazil , 2006 .

[13]  R. Rosaldo,et al.  Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. , 1990 .

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[15]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Beyond SDI: Integrating Science and Communities to Create Environmental Policies for the Sustainability of the Amazon , 2009, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[16]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  The dynamic structure of everyday life , 1988 .

[17]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[18]  N. Quinn,et al.  A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning , 1998 .

[19]  A. Rector,et al.  Relations in biomedical ontologies , 2005, Genome Biology.

[20]  A. Rajabifard,et al.  Spatial Data Infrastructures: Concept, SDI Hierarchy and Future Directions. , 2001 .

[21]  David M. Mark,et al.  Next-Generation Digital Earth: A position paper from the Vespucci Initiative for the Advancement of Geographic Information Science , 2008, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[22]  R. Lawlor Voices of the First Day: Awakening in the Aboriginal Dreamtime , 1991 .

[23]  Akhil Gupta,et al.  Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology , 1997 .

[24]  R. Schultes Ethnobotany and Technology in the North-west Amazon: Example of a Partnership , 1991, Environmental Conservation.

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[26]  Stephen P. Hugh-Jones Clear Descent or Ambiguous Houses ? A Re-Examination of Tukanoan Social Organisation , 1993 .

[27]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[28]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Integration Networks , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  R. D'Andrade The Development of Cognitive Anthropology , 1995 .

[30]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  What are ontologies, and why do we need them? , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[31]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 1995 .

[32]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. , 1979 .

[33]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing it Would Require Making it More Heideggerian , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[34]  A. Escobar Whose Knowledge, Whose nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements , 1998 .

[35]  Paul DiMaggio Culture and cognition , 1997 .

[36]  S. Levinson,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.3 March 2004 Can language restructure cognition? The case for space , 2022 .

[37]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  The Cognitive Culture System , 1995 .

[38]  Michael Uschold Where Are the Semantics in the Semantic Web? , 2003, AI Mag..

[39]  David M. Mark,et al.  Landscape Categories in Yindjibarndi: Ontology, Environment, and Language , 2003, COSIT.

[40]  Barry Smith,et al.  Formal ontology, common sense and cognitive science , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  G. Reichel-Dolmatoff THE FOREST WITHIN , 2018, Medicinal Rule.

[42]  Stuart C. Shapiro Review of Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations by John F. Sowa. Brooks/Cole 2000. , 2001 .

[43]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[44]  Steven Feld,et al.  Senses of Place , 1997, Western Folklore.