Far-Side Audible Beaconing of Accessible Pedestrian Signals

Research has demonstrated that accessible pedestrian signals (APS) with push button–integrated speakers increase push-button use and increase the likelihood of starting to cross during the walk interval by pedestrians who are blind. However, consistently positive effects on locating the crosswalk or establishing or maintaining an accurate heading for crossing have not been found. Attempts have recently been made to configure APS to provide better audible information for these wayfinding tasks. A configuration that has been shown to improve heading accuracy provides audible tones from a speaker at the destination corner before the walk interval (to assist with establishing heading) and during the flashing “Don't Walk” interval (to assist with maintaining heading). Major concerns are that beaconing information may be ambiguous or misleading and result in dangerous crossing behavior at intersections where buildings create echoes of audible signal information and where beacons for multiple crosswalks might be active simultaneously. This study evaluated the effects of a beaconing APS system on pedestrian crossing behavior at an acoustically complex intersection and with multiple beacons sometimes concurrently active. Eighteen participants who were totally blind attempted a total of 216 crossings under three conditions. The results revealed no evidence that participants were distracted or were misled by concurrent beaconing information coming from a corner other than the target destination. Moreover, despite an acoustically complex environment, the beacon led to improved wayfinding Performance in some conditions and showed no evidence of having any deleterious effects.

[1]  Torben Poulsen Acoustic traffic signal for blind pedestrians , 1982 .

[2]  M M Uslan,et al.  AUDIBLE TRAFFIC SIGNALS: HOW USEFUL ARE THEY? , 1988 .

[3]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  Field Evaluation of Audible Traffic Signals for Blind Pedestrians , 2000 .

[4]  Janet M Barlow,et al.  Challenges of Unfamiliar Signalized Intersections for Pedestrians Who Are Blind: Research on Safety , 2004 .

[5]  Billie Louise Bentzen,et al.  Directional guidance from audible pedestrian signals for street crossing , 2004, Ergonomics.

[6]  Jeannine S. Schiller,et al.  Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2001. , 2004, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[7]  Janet M Barlow,et al.  Blind Pedestrians and the Changing Technology and Geometry of Signalized Intersections: Safety, Orientation, and Independence , 2005, Journal of visual impairment & blindness.

[8]  David A Noyce,et al.  Determination of Pedestrian Push-Button Activation Duration at Typical Signalized Intersections , 2005 .

[9]  Ron Van Houten,et al.  Field comparison of two types of accessible pedestrian signals , 2005 .

[10]  Kathleen A Turano,et al.  Gaze Behavior of the Visually Impaired During Street Crossing , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  Janet M Barlow,et al.  Accessible Pedestrian Signals at Complex Intersections , 2008 .

[12]  Janet M Barlow,et al.  Audible Beaconing with Accessible Pedestrian Signals. , 2009, AER journal : research and practice in visual impairment and blindness.

[13]  Janet M Barlow,et al.  Walking between the Lines: Nonvisual Cues for Maintaining Headings during Street Crossings , 2011 .

[14]  Janet M Barlow,et al.  Perception of Pedestrian Traffic Signals by Pedestrians with Varying Levels of Vision , 2012, Transportation research record.

[15]  Janet M Barlow,et al.  Effectiveness of Audible and Tactile Heading Cues at Complex Intersections for Pedestrians who are Blind , 2013 .

[16]  윤태영,et al.  Transportation Research Board of the National Academies , 2015 .