Information Certainty Determines Social and Private Information Use in Ants
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Kevin N Laland,et al. Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[2] Larissa Conradt,et al. Conflicts of interest and the evolution of decision sharing , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[3] S. G. Reebs. Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[4] N. Franks,et al. Improving Decision Speed, Accuracy and Group Cohesion through Early Information Gathering in House-Hunting Ants , 2010, PloS one.
[5] S. Pratt,et al. A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[6] I. Couzin,et al. “Leading According to Need” in Self‐Organizing Groups , 2009, The American Naturalist.
[7] Nicole Propst,et al. Classical Conditioning Ii Current Research And Theory , 2016 .
[8] Christian List,et al. Democracy in animal groups: a political science perspective. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[9] D. Helbing,et al. How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[10] I. Couzin,et al. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.
[11] N. Franks,et al. Seasonality in communication and collective decision-making in ants , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[12] D. Sumpter. The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[13] Christian List,et al. Independence and interdependence in collective decision making: an agent-based model of nest-site choice by honeybee swarms , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[14] D. Helbing,et al. Leadership, consensus decision making and collective behaviour in humans , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[15] Lydia M. Hopper,et al. Chimpanzees copy dominant and knowledgeable individuals: implications for cultural diversity. , 2015, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.
[16] A. Flack,et al. The effect of experienced individuals on navigation by king penguin chick pairs , 2015, Animal Behaviour.
[17] S. Pratt,et al. Queen location and nest site preference influence colony reunification by the ant Temnothorax rugatulus , 2016, Insectes Sociaux.
[18] Thomas D. Seeley,et al. Honey bees use social information in waggle dances more fully when foraging errors are more costly , 2012 .
[19] Eamonn B. Mallon,et al. Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[20] N. Franks,et al. Improvement in collective performance with experience in ants , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[21] T. Czaczkes,et al. Composite collective decision-making , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[22] Barney Luttbeg,et al. A Comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice , 1996 .
[23] David Lusseau,et al. The emergence of unshared consensus decisions in bottlenose dolphins , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[24] T. Collett. Insect Behaviour: Learning for the Future , 2008, Current Biology.
[25] C. Grüter,et al. Informational conflicts created by the waggle dance , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[26] N. R. Franks,et al. Avoidance of conspecific colonies during nest choice by ants , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[27] Anna Dornhaus,et al. Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[28] S. Pratt,et al. Quorum responses and consensus decision making , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[29] Iain D Couzin,et al. Potential Leaders Trade Off Goal-Oriented and Socially Oriented Behavior in Mobile Animal Groups , 2015, The American Naturalist.
[30] S. Pratt. Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .
[31] F. Ratnieks,et al. Honeybee foragers increase the use of waggle dance information when private information becomes unrewarding , 2011, Animal Behaviour.
[32] Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al. Social learning strategies in honeybee foragers: do the costs of using private information affect the use of social information? , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[33] Guy Cowlishaw,et al. Leaders, followers, and group decision-making , 2009, Communicative & integrative biology.
[34] D. Sumpter,et al. Quorum Decision-Making in Foraging Fish Shoals , 2012, PloS one.
[35] M. Manser,et al. Resolution of experimentally induced symmetrical conflicts of interest in meerkats , 2011, Animal Behaviour.
[36] N. Franks,et al. Knowledgeable individuals lead collective decisions in ants , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[37] B. Doligez,et al. Gathering public information for habitat selection: prospecting birds cue on parental activity , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[38] Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al. The Origins and Evolution of Leadership , 2009, Current Biology.
[39] Andrew M Simons,et al. Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[40] W. F. Prokasy,et al. Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .
[41] K. Laland. Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.
[42] A. Flack,et al. What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader–follower relations in homing pigeons , 2012, Animal Behaviour.
[43] L. Conradt,et al. Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[44] R. Dukas,et al. Cognitive ecology II , 2009 .
[45] Jens Krause,et al. Accurate decisions in an uncertain world: collective cognition increases true positives while decreasing false positives , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[46] Stefan Krause,et al. Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[47] Guy Cowlishaw,et al. When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.
[48] F. Ratnieks,et al. Decision making in ant foragers (Lasius niger) facing conflicting private and social information , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[49] I. Couzin,et al. Consensus decision making in human crowds , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[50] F. Ratnieks,et al. Synergy between social and private information increases foraging efficiency in ants , 2011, Biology Letters.
[51] R. Josens,et al. Food information acquired socially overrides individual food assessment in ants , 2016, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[52] Eamonn B. Mallon,et al. Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[53] Scott D. Brown,et al. Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[54] D. Sumpter,et al. Consensus Decision Making by Fish , 2008, Current Biology.
[55] J. Heinze,et al. “Selfish worker policing” controls reproduction in a Temnothorax ant , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[56] T. Valone,et al. Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[57] Jennifer J. Templeton,et al. Environmental Unpredictability and the Value of Social Information for Foraging Starlings , 2003 .
[58] C. List,et al. Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[59] Eamonn B. Mallon,et al. Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.
[60] Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers,et al. Humans use social information to adjust their quorum thresholds adaptively in a simulated predator detection experiment , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[61] A. Dornhaus,et al. Ants move to improve: colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site , 2004, Animal Behaviour.
[62] S. Pratt. Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.
[63] N. R. Franks,et al. Speed–cohesion trade-offs in collective decision making in ants and the concept of precision in animal behaviour , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[64] Paul J. B. Hart,et al. Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[65] D. Sharpe. Your Chi-Square Test Is Statistically Significant: Now What?. , 2015 .
[66] Colin R. Twomey,et al. Visual sensory networks and effective information transfer in animal groups , 2013, Current Biology.
[67] B. Galef,et al. Social learning of food preferences in ‘dissatisfied’ and ‘uncertain’ Norway rats , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[68] C. Grüter,et al. Insights from insects about adaptive social information use. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.