Information Certainty Determines Social and Private Information Use in Ants

Decision-making in uncertain environments requires animals to evaluate, contrast and integrate various information sources to choose appropriate actions. In consensus-making groups, quorum responses are commonly used to combine private and social information, leading to both robust and flexible decisions. Here we show that in house-hunting ant colonies, individuals fine-tune the parameters of their quorum responses depending on their private knowledge: informed ants evaluating a familiar new nest rely relatively more on social than private information when the certainty of their private information is low, and vice versa. This indicates that the ants follow a highly sophisticated ‘copy-when-uncertain’ social learning strategy similar to that observed in a few vertebrate species. Using simulations, we further show that this strategy improves colony performance during emigrations and confers well-informed individuals more weight in the decision process, thus representing a novel mechanism for the emergence of leadership in collective decision-making.

[1]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Larissa Conradt,et al.  Conflicts of interest and the evolution of decision sharing , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  S. G. Reebs Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  N. Franks,et al.  Improving Decision Speed, Accuracy and Group Cohesion through Early Information Gathering in House-Hunting Ants , 2010, PloS one.

[5]  S. Pratt,et al.  A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  I. Couzin,et al.  “Leading According to Need” in Self‐Organizing Groups , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Nicole Propst,et al.  Classical Conditioning Ii Current Research And Theory , 2016 .

[8]  Christian List,et al.  Democracy in animal groups: a political science perspective. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  D. Helbing,et al.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[11]  N. Franks,et al.  Seasonality in communication and collective decision-making in ants , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  D. Sumpter The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Christian List,et al.  Independence and interdependence in collective decision making: an agent-based model of nest-site choice by honeybee swarms , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  D. Helbing,et al.  Leadership, consensus decision making and collective behaviour in humans , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Chimpanzees copy dominant and knowledgeable individuals: implications for cultural diversity. , 2015, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[16]  A. Flack,et al.  The effect of experienced individuals on navigation by king penguin chick pairs , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  S. Pratt,et al.  Queen location and nest site preference influence colony reunification by the ant Temnothorax rugatulus , 2016, Insectes Sociaux.

[18]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Honey bees use social information in waggle dances more fully when foraging errors are more costly , 2012 .

[19]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  N. Franks,et al.  Improvement in collective performance with experience in ants , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  T. Czaczkes,et al.  Composite collective decision-making , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Barney Luttbeg,et al.  A Comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice , 1996 .

[23]  David Lusseau,et al.  The emergence of unshared consensus decisions in bottlenose dolphins , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  T. Collett Insect Behaviour: Learning for the Future , 2008, Current Biology.

[25]  C. Grüter,et al.  Informational conflicts created by the waggle dance , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Avoidance of conspecific colonies during nest choice by ants , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  S. Pratt,et al.  Quorum responses and consensus decision making , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  Potential Leaders Trade Off Goal-Oriented and Socially Oriented Behavior in Mobile Animal Groups , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[30]  S. Pratt Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .

[31]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Honeybee foragers increase the use of waggle dance information when private information becomes unrewarding , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  Francis L. W. Ratnieks,et al.  Social learning strategies in honeybee foragers: do the costs of using private information affect the use of social information? , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  Leaders, followers, and group decision-making , 2009, Communicative & integrative biology.

[34]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Quorum Decision-Making in Foraging Fish Shoals , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  M. Manser,et al.  Resolution of experimentally induced symmetrical conflicts of interest in meerkats , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  N. Franks,et al.  Knowledgeable individuals lead collective decisions in ants , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[37]  B. Doligez,et al.  Gathering public information for habitat selection: prospecting birds cue on parental activity , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al.  The Origins and Evolution of Leadership , 2009, Current Biology.

[39]  Andrew M Simons,et al.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .

[41]  K. Laland Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[42]  A. Flack,et al.  What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader–follower relations in homing pigeons , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  R. Dukas,et al.  Cognitive ecology II , 2009 .

[45]  Jens Krause,et al.  Accurate decisions in an uncertain world: collective cognition increases true positives while decreasing false positives , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Stefan Krause,et al.  Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.

[48]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Decision making in ant foragers (Lasius niger) facing conflicting private and social information , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[49]  I. Couzin,et al.  Consensus decision making in human crowds , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Synergy between social and private information increases foraging efficiency in ants , 2011, Biology Letters.

[51]  R. Josens,et al.  Food information acquired socially overrides individual food assessment in ants , 2016, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[52]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[53]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Consensus Decision Making by Fish , 2008, Current Biology.

[55]  J. Heinze,et al.  “Selfish worker policing” controls reproduction in a Temnothorax ant , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[56]  T. Valone,et al.  Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[57]  Jennifer J. Templeton,et al.  Environmental Unpredictability and the Value of Social Information for Foraging Starlings , 2003 .

[58]  C. List,et al.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers,et al.  Humans use social information to adjust their quorum thresholds adaptively in a simulated predator detection experiment , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[61]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Ants move to improve: colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  S. Pratt Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[63]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Speed–cohesion trade-offs in collective decision making in ants and the concept of precision in animal behaviour , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[64]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  D. Sharpe Your Chi-Square Test Is Statistically Significant: Now What?. , 2015 .

[66]  Colin R. Twomey,et al.  Visual sensory networks and effective information transfer in animal groups , 2013, Current Biology.

[67]  B. Galef,et al.  Social learning of food preferences in ‘dissatisfied’ and ‘uncertain’ Norway rats , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[68]  C. Grüter,et al.  Insights from insects about adaptive social information use. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.