Addressing overutilization in medical imaging.

The growth in medical imaging over the past 2 decades has yielded unarguable benefits to patients in terms of longer lives of higher quality. This growth reflects new technologies and applications, including high-tech services such as multisection computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET). Some part of the growth, however, can be attributed to the overutilization of imaging services. This report examines the causes of the overutilization of imaging and identifies ways of addressing the causes so that overutilization can be reduced. In August 2009, the American Board of Radiology Foundation hosted a 2-day summit to discuss the causes and effects of the overutilization of imaging. More than 60 organizations were represented at the meeting, including health care accreditation and certification entities, foundations, government agencies, hospital and health systems, insurers, medical societies, health care quality consortia, and standards and regulatory agencies. Key forces influencing overutilization were identified. These include the payment mechanisms and financial incentives in the U.S. health care system; the practice behavior of referring physicians; self-referral, including referral for additional radiologic examinations; defensive medicine; missed educational opportunities when inappropriate procedures are requested; patient expectations; and duplicate imaging studies. Summit participants suggested several areas for improvement to reduce overutilization, including a national collaborative effort to develop evidence-based appropriateness criteria for imaging; greater use of practice guidelines in requesting and conducting imaging studies; decision support at point of care; education of referring physicians, patients, and the public; accreditation of imaging facilities; management of self-referral and defensive medicine; and payment reform.

[1]  D. Levin,et al.  Turf wars in radiology: the overutilization of imaging resulting from self-referral. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[2]  James H Thrall,et al.  Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. , 2009, Radiology.

[3]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Kavita Garg,et al.  Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. , 2008, Radiology.

[5]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[7]  A. Elster,et al.  Does Radiologist Recommendation for Follow-up with the Same Imaging Modality Contribute Substantially to High-Cost Imaging Volume? , 2008 .

[8]  Douglas McCarthy,et al.  Why Not the Best? Results from the National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011 , 2006 .

[9]  C. Sistrom,et al.  The appropriateness of imaging: a comprehensive conceptual framework. , 2009, Radiology.

[10]  T. Brennan,et al.  Direct-to-consumer marketing of high-technology screening tests. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Victor R Fuchs,et al.  The perfect storm of overutilization. , 2008, JAMA.

[12]  E. Picano Sustainability of medical imaging , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  J. Iglehart,et al.  The new era of medical imaging--progress and pitfalls. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  D. A. Foster,et al.  The association between hospital outcomes and diagnostic imaging: early findings. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[15]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[16]  C. Cowan,et al.  Health spending projections through 2017: the baby-boom generation is coming to Medicare. , 2008, Health affairs.

[17]  James H Thrall,et al.  Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. , 2009, Radiology.