A trigger tool to identify adverse events in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND The Institute for Healthcare Improvement has tested and taught use of a variety of trigger tools, including those for adverse medication events, neonatal intensive care events, and a global trigger tool for measuring all event categories in a hospital. The trigger tools have evolved as a complimentary adjunct to voluntary reporting. The Trigger Tool technique was used to identify the rate of occurrence of adverse events in the intensive care unit (ICU), and a subset of ICUs described those events in detail. METHODS Sixty-two ICUs in 54 hospitals (both academic and community) engaged in IHI critical care collaboratives between 2001 and late 2004. Charts were selected using a random sampling technique and reviewed using a two-stage process. RESULTS The prevalence of adverse events observed on 12,074 ICU admissions was 11.3 adverse events/100 patient days. For a subset of 1,294 charts from 13 ICUs which were reviewed in detail, 1,450 adverse events were identified, for a prevalence of 16.4 events/100 ICU days. Fifty-five percent of the charts in this subset contained at least one adverse event. DISCUSSION The Trigger Tool methodology is a practical approach to enhance detection of adverse events in ICU patients. Evaluation of these adverse events can be used to direct resource use for improvement work. The measurement of these sampled chart reviews can also be used to follow the impact of the change strategies on the occurrence of adverse events within a local ICU.

[1]  R S Evans,et al.  Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. 1991. , 1991, Quality & safety in health care.

[2]  D. Bates,et al.  Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units. , 1997, Critical care medicine.

[3]  D. Classen,et al.  Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care* , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[5]  Albert W Wu,et al.  ICU incident reporting systems. , 2002, Journal of critical care.

[6]  T. Brennan,et al.  The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R S Evans,et al.  Description of a computerized adverse drug event monitor using a hospital information system. , 1992, Hospital pharmacy.

[8]  R. Resar,et al.  Standardization as a mechanism to improve safety in health care. , 2004, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[9]  R. Resar,et al.  Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[10]  S D Small,et al.  The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. , 1995, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.