A Benchmark Simulation for Moist Nonhydrostatic Numerical Models

A benchmark solution that facilitates testing the accuracy, efficiency, and efficacy of moist nonhydrostatic numerical model formulations and assumptions is presented. The solution is created from a special configuration of moist model processes and a specific set of initial conditions. The configuration and initial conditions include: reversible phase changes, no hydrometeor fallout, a neutrally stable base-state environment, and an initial buoyancy perturbation that is identical to the one used to test nonlinearly evolving dry thermals. The results of the moist simulation exhibit many of the properties found in its dry counterpart. Given the similar results, and acceptably small total mass and total energy errors, it is argued that this new moist simulation design can be used as a benchmark to evaluate moist numerical model formulations. The utility of the benchmark simulation is highlighted by running the case with approximate forms of the governing equations found in the literature. Results of these tests have implications for the formulation of numerical models. For example, it is shown that an equation set that conserves both mass and energy is crucial for obtaining the benchmark solution. Results also suggest that the extra effort required to conserve mass in a numerical model may not lead to significant improvements in results unless energy is also conserved.

[1]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  Time-Splitting Methods for Elastic Models Using Forward Time Schemes , 2002 .

[2]  P. R. Bannon Theoretical Foundations for Models of Moist Convection , 2002 .

[3]  Masaki Satoh,et al.  Conservative scheme for the compressible nonhydrostatic models with the horizontally explicit and vertically implicit time integration scheme , 2002 .

[4]  K. Ooyama A Dynamic and Thermodynamic Foundation for Modeling the Moist Atmosphere with Parameterized Microphysics. , 2001 .

[5]  M. Xue,et al.  Numerical Equivalence of Advection in Flux and Advective Forms and Quadratically Conservative High-Order Advection Schemes , 2001 .

[6]  K. Droegemeier,et al.  The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) – A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction model. Part I: Model dynamics and verification , 2000 .

[7]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  A Time-Splitting Scheme for the Elastic Equations Incorporating Second-Order Runge–Kutta Time Differencing , 1998 .

[8]  R. Hodur The Naval Research Laboratory’s Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS) , 1997 .

[9]  William C. Skamarock,et al.  Efficiency and Accuracy of the Klemp-Wilhelmson Time-Splitting Technique , 1994 .

[10]  Louis J. Wicker,et al.  Numerical solutions of a non‐linear density current: A benchmark solution and comparisons , 1993 .

[11]  J. Dudhia A Nonhydrostatic Version of the Penn State–NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation Tests and Simulation of an Atlantic Cyclone and Cold Front , 1993 .

[12]  W. Skamarock,et al.  The stability of time-split numerical methods for the hydrostatic and the nonhydrostatic elastic equations , 1992 .

[13]  G. Tripoli A Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model Designed to Simulate Scale Interaction , 1992 .

[14]  R. Pielke,et al.  A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS , 1992 .

[15]  S. Rutledge,et al.  The Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and Organization of Clouds and Precipitation in Midlatitude Cyclones. VIII: A Model for the “Seeder-Feeder” Process in Warm-Frontal Rainbands , 1983 .

[16]  D. Durran,et al.  On the Effects of Moisture on the Brunt-Väisälä Frequency. , 1982 .

[17]  Robert B. Wilhelmson,et al.  A Simulation of the Development of Successive Cells Along a Cold Outflow Boundary , 1982 .

[18]  William R. Cotton,et al.  The Use of lce-Liquid Water Potential Temperature as a Thermodynamic Variable In Deep Atmospheric Models , 1981 .

[19]  J. Klemp,et al.  The Simulation of Three-Dimensional Convective Storm Dynamics , 1978 .

[20]  T. Clark A small-scale dynamic model using a terrain-following coordinate transformation , 1977 .

[21]  Yoshimitsu Ogura,et al.  A Comparison Between Axisymmetric and Slab-Symmetric Cumulus Cloud Models , 1973 .

[22]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  Prototypes for the WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting) model [presentation] , 2001 .

[23]  R. Hemler,et al.  Another Look at the Thermodynamic Equation For Deep Convection , 1980 .