Reducing aquatic hazards of industrial chemicals: probabilistic assessment of sustainable molecular design guidelines.

Basic toxicological information is lacking for the majority of industrial chemicals. In addition to increasing empirical toxicity data through additional testing, prospective computational approaches to drug development aim to serve as a rational basis for the design of chemicals with reduced toxicity. Recent work has resulted in the derivation of a "rule of 2," wherein chemicals with an octanol-water partition coefficient (log P) less than 2 and a difference between the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital and the highest occupied molecular orbital (ΔE) greater than 9 (log P<2 and ΔE >9 eV) are predicted to be 4 to 5 times less likely to elicit acute or chronic toxicity to model aquatic organisms. The present study examines potential reduction of aquatic toxicity hazards from industrial chemicals if these 2 molecular design guidelines were employed. Probabilistic hazard assessment approaches were used to model the likelihood of encountering industrial chemicals exceeding toxicological categories of concern both with and without the rule of 2. Modeling predicted that utilization of these molecular design guidelines for log P and ΔE would appreciably decrease the number of chemicals that would be designated to be of "high" and "very high" concern for acute and chronic toxicity to standard model aquatic organisms and end points as defined by the US Environmental Protection Agency. For example, 14.5% of chemicals were categorized as having high and very high acute toxicity to the fathead minnow model, whereas only 3.3% of chemicals conforming to the design guidelines were predicted to be in these categories. Considerations of specific chemical classes (e.g., aldehydes), chemical attributes (e.g., ionization), and adverse outcome pathways in representative species (e.g., receptor-mediated responses) could be used to derive future property guidelines for broader classes of contaminants.

[1]  J. Tarazona,et al.  Statistical evaluation of chronic toxicity data on aquatic organisms for the hazard identification: the chemicals toxicity distribution approach. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[2]  Paul T Anastas,et al.  Fundamental changes to EPA's research enterprise: the path forward. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Kristin A Connors,et al.  Human therapeutic plasma levels of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline decrease serotonin reuptake transporter binding and shelter-seeking behavior in adult male fathead minnows. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  R. Brain,et al.  Probabilistic ecological hazard assessment: evaluating pharmaceutical effects on aquatic higher plants as an example. , 2006, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[5]  S. Trapp,et al.  Optimal choice of pH for toxicity and bioaccumulation studies of ionizing organic chemicals , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[6]  P. Anastas,et al.  Green Chemistry , 2018, Environmental Science.

[7]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants , 1992 .

[8]  R. Kroes,et al.  [The threshold of toxicological concern]. , 2002, Voprosy pitaniia.

[9]  E D Kroese,et al.  REACH, non-testing approaches and the urgent need for a change in mind set. , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[11]  C. Chambliss,et al.  Aquatic toxicity of sertraline to Pimephales promelas at environmentally relevant surface water pH , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[12]  J. Vervoort,et al.  Quantum chemistry based quantitative structure‐activity relationships for modeling the (sub)acute toxicity of substituted mononitrobenzenes in aquatic systems , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[13]  C. Russom,et al.  Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) , 1997 .

[14]  Paul T Anastas,et al.  Toward a comprehensive molecular design framework for reduced hazard. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[15]  A. Fisk,et al.  Bioaccumulation, biotransformation, and metabolite formation of fipronil and chiral legacy pesticides in rainbow trout. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  A. Fisk,et al.  Bioaccumulation and biotransformation of chiral triazole fungicides in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). , 2006, Aquatic toxicology.

[17]  Tingting Du,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of the toxicity of organothiophosphate pesticides to Daphnia magna and Cyprinus carpio. , 2009, Chemosphere.

[18]  Bryan W Brooks,et al.  Influence of drought and total phosphorus on diel pH in wadeable streams: Implications for ecological risk assessment of ionizable contaminants , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[19]  Bryan W Brooks,et al.  Leveraging mammalian pharmaceutical toxicology and pharmacology data to predict chronic fish responses to pharmaceuticals. , 2010, Toxicology letters.

[20]  Richard A Brain,et al.  Probabilistic ecological hazard assessment of parabens using Daphnia magna and Pimephales promelas , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[21]  Gilman D. Veith,et al.  Structure–Toxicity Relationships for the Fathead Minnow, Pimephales promelas: Narcotic Industrial Chemicals , 1983 .

[22]  R A Ford,et al.  Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[23]  Bryan W Brooks,et al.  An initial probabilistic hazard assessment of oil dispersants approved by the united states national contingency plan , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[24]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)). , 2009, ALTEX.

[25]  Manuela Pavan,et al.  Review of (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationships for Acute Aquatic Toxicity , 2008 .

[26]  Roger L. Garrett Pollution Prevention, Green Chemistry, and the Design of Safer Chemicals , 1996 .

[27]  P. Takács,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Assessment Using Species Sensitivity Distributions , 2001 .

[28]  R Kroes,et al.  The threshold of toxicological concern concept in risk assessment. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[29]  Alejandro J. Ramirez,et al.  Enantiospecific sublethal effects of the antidepressant fluoxetine to a model aquatic vertebrate and invertebrate. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[30]  J. Nichols,et al.  Enantiomer-specific in vitro biotransformation of select pharmaceuticals in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). , 2013, Chirality.

[31]  Alejandro J. Ramirez,et al.  Enantiospecific toxicity of the β‐blocker propranolol to Daphnia magna and Pimephales promelas , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[32]  I C Munro,et al.  The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) in risk assessment. , 2008, Toxicology letters.

[33]  D. Paustenbach,et al.  The European Union’s REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements , 2009, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[34]  Karen Blackburn,et al.  Application of the threshold of toxicological concern approach to ingredients in personal and household care products. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[35]  James W. McFarland,et al.  Parabolic relation between drug potency and hydrophobicity , 1970 .

[36]  C. Chambliss,et al.  Effects of the antihistamine diphenhydramine on selected aquatic organisms , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[37]  Julie B. Zimmerman,et al.  Towards rational molecular design: derivation of property guidelines for reduced acute aquatic toxicity , 2011 .

[38]  R. Brain,et al.  Comparison of the sensitivities of common in vitro and in vivo assays of estrogenic activity: Application of chemical toxicity distributions , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[39]  Zhiyan Pan,et al.  Enantioselectivity in estrogenic potential and uptake of bifenthrin. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Bryan W Brooks,et al.  Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH , 2011, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[41]  T. Wayne Schultz,et al.  Structure‐activity relationships for Pimephales and Tetrahymena: A mechanism of action approach , 1997 .

[42]  Gary M. Rand,et al.  Fundamentals of aquatic toxicology: effects, environmental fate, and risk assessment , 1995 .

[43]  Julie B. Zimmerman,et al.  Towards rational molecular design for reduced chronic aquatic toxicity , 2012 .

[44]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Meeting the scientific needs of ecological risk assessment in a regulatory context. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[45]  S. Trapp,et al.  An unexpected challenge: ionizable compounds in the REACH chemical space , 2010 .

[46]  Watze de Wolf,et al.  Mode of action and aquatic exposure thresholds of no concern , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.