A comparative study of several supervised target detection algorithms for hyperspectral images

Target detection using hyperspectral images has gained popularity in recent years. In this paper, we present a preliminary comparative study of several simple, easy to use, and supervised target detection algorithms, including constrained signal detector (CSD), adaptive CSD, matched subspace detector (MSD), and adaptive subspace detector (ASD). Actual hyperspectral data have been used in our studies. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to compare the various algorithms. It was found that ASD yielded the best performance under the same set of conditions.

[1]  C. Kwan,et al.  Advanced Agent Identification With Fluctuation-Enhanced Sensing , 2008, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[2]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi.  Kernel-Based Spectral Matched Signal Detectors for Hyperspectral Target Detection , 2007, PReMI.

[3]  Chein-I. Chang.  Hyperspectral Imaging: Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification , 2003 .

[4]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  On the use of radiance domain for burn scar detection under varying atmospheric illumination conditions and viewing geometry , 2017, Signal Image Video Process..

[5]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  A joint sparsity approach to tunnel activity monitoring using high resolution satellite images , 2017, 2017 IEEE 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON).

[6]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel matched subspace detectors for hyperspectral target detection , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  Endmember extraction in hyperspectral images using l-1 minimization and linear complementary programming , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel adaptive subspace detector for hyperspectral imagery , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[9]  Hairong Qi,et al.  Low-rank tensor decomposition based anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[10]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  A Novel Cluster Kernel RX Algorithm for Anomaly and Change Detection Using Hyperspectral Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Jing Wang,et al.  A novel approach for spectral unmixing, classification, and concentration estimation of chemical and biological agents , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Michael T. Eismann,et al.  Adaptive constrained signal detector for hyperspectral images , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  A Novel Utilization of Image Registration Techniques to Process Mastcam Images in Mars Rover With Applications to Image Fusion, Pixel Clustering, and Anomaly Detection , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Yuzhong Shen,et al.  Deep learning for effective detection of excavated soil related to illegal tunnel activities , 2017, 2017 IEEE 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON).

[15]  S. Johnson,et al.  The constrained signal detector , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  Anomaly detection in hyperspectral images through spectral unmixing and low rank decomposition , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[17]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  Application of Deep Belief Network to Land Cover Classification Using Hyperspectral Images , 2017, ISNN.

[18]  Chiman Kwan,et al.  Improved target detection for hyperspectral images using hybrid in-scene calibration , 2017 .