Bibliometric and visualized analysis of research relating to minimally invasive spine surgery reported over the period 2000–2022

Background Since entering the 21st century, there has been an increasing interest in minimally invasive surgery for spinal diseases, which has led to the continued development of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), with major breakthroughs in technology and technical skills. However, in recent years, there is little relevant research using bibliometrics to analyze the field of MISS research. The purpose of this study is to sort out the publication situation and topic trends of articles in the field of MISS research from the perspective of bibliometrics. Methods The articles and reviews related to MISS from 2000 to 2022 were retrieved and downloaded from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). Visualization and knowledge mapping were performed using three bibliometric tools, including online bibliometric platform, CiteSpace and VOSviewer software. Curve fitting and correlation analysis were performed using Microsoft Excel software. The global research publication output, contributions of countries, institutions, authors, and journals, average citations per item (ACI), Hirsch index (H-index), research hot keywords, etc., in this field were analyzed. Results A total of 2384 papers were retrieved, including 2135 original papers and 249 review papers. In the past 22 years, the number of annual publications of MISS research has shown a steady growth trend. China contributed the most papers, and the United States ranked second, but the United States had the highest total citations, and H-index value. The most prolific institutions were Soochow University, Capital Medical University and Wooridul Spine Hospital. In this field, Professors Lee SH, Ahn Y and Yang HL have made significant achievements. However, there is relatively little international collaboration between institutions or researchers. World Neurosurgery is the most published journal on MISS research. According to the keyword co-occurrence analysis, recent keywords mainly focus on researches on minimally invasive modalities, techniques and prognosis, while on the keyword analysis of the ongoing bursts, percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, lumbar diskectomy, spinal stenosis, recompression, diskectomy, endoscopic spine surgery, laminectomy, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, etc., will likely continue to be a research hotspot in the near future. Conclusion Looking at the temporal trend in the number of publications per year, the number of publications for the MISS study will increase in the near future. China has the highest number of publications, but the US has the highest quality publications. International cooperation needs to be further strengthened. Our findings can provide useful information for the academic community and identify possible research fronts and hotspots in the coming years.

[1]  Xiaobin Wang,et al.  The top 100 most-cited articles on adult spinal deformity: The most popular topics are still sagittal plane parameters and complications , 2023, Frontiers in Surgery.

[2]  Boyu Wu,et al.  Global Trends and Hotspots in Endoscopic Discectomy: A Study Based on Bibliometric Analysis , 2022, Neurospine.

[3]  Serhat Comert Studies on Kyphoplasty over 20 years by science mapping method: Kyphoplasty by science mapping method , 2022, Medicine.

[4]  Weiguang Yang,et al.  Mapping Knowledge Structure and Themes Trends of Osteoporosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Bibliometric Analysis , 2021, Frontiers in Medicine.

[5]  H. Terai,et al.  Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum 5-year follow-up. , 2021, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  Zhiming Sun,et al.  The Global Research Trends and Hotspots on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study , 2021, Frontiers in Surgery.

[7]  Luxia Song,et al.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Pyroptosis From 2001 to 2021 , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[8]  A. Paladini,et al.  Decompression Using Minimally Invasive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Review , 2021, Pain and Therapy.

[9]  Kehu Yang,et al.  Current Status and Trends in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in the Past 20 Years (2000–2019): A Bibliometric Study , 2021, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[10]  Zhiming Sun,et al.  Worldwide research tendency and hotspots on hip fracture: a 20-year bibliometric analysis , 2021, Archives of Osteoporosis.

[11]  W. V. Van Hemert,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OTLIF) versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MITLIF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2021, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  A. Giustini,et al.  Association Between Citations, Altmetrics, and Article Views in Pediatric Research , 2020, JAMA network open.

[13]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Factors affecting approach selection for minimally invasive versus open surgery in the treatment of adult spinal deformity: analysis of a prospective, nonrandomized multicenter study. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[14]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  Overview of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[15]  Andy Wai Kan Yeung,et al.  The Innovative and Sustainable Use of Dental Panoramic Radiographs for the Detection of Osteoporosis , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[16]  Siming Zhou,et al.  Investigating Research Hotspots and Publication Trends of Spinal Stenosis: A Bibliometric Analysis During 2000–2018 , 2020, Frontiers in Medicine.

[17]  C. Zheng,et al.  Bibliometric and Visualized analysis of Scientific Publications on Atlantoaxial Spine Surgery based on Web of Science and VOSviewer. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[18]  Helena Blažun Vošner,et al.  Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis. , 2020, Health information and libraries journal.

[19]  Shengjie Dong,et al.  The global state of research in nonsurgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized study , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[20]  Dong Chan Lee,et al.  Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery. , 2019, Neurosurgical focus.

[21]  Douglas S. Wetmore,et al.  Design and Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Spine Surgery: Initial Experience , 2019, Spine.

[22]  S. Dhall,et al.  Outcomes of Posterior Thoracic Corpectomies for Metastatic Spine Tumors: An Analysis of 90 Patients. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[23]  S. Sharif,et al.  Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery: How to Keep out of Trouble. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[24]  A. Paschalis,et al.  Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) in the management of degenerative scoliosis: a retrospective case series. , 2018, Journal of spine surgery.

[25]  Clifford Lin New Technologies in Spine: Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Compression Fractures * , 2018, 50 Landmark Papers.

[26]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[27]  S. Virk,et al.  The Top 50 Articles on Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery , 2017, Spine.

[28]  Jian Dong,et al.  Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture. , 2016, International journal of surgery.

[29]  Q. Pu,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015 , 2016, BMJ Open.

[30]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  Endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion without general anesthesia: initial clinical experience with 1-year follow-up. , 2016, Neurosurgical focus.

[31]  Cheri K Walker,et al.  A Descriptive and Historical Review of Bibliometrics with Applications to Medical Sciences , 2015, Pharmacotherapy.

[32]  W. Saad,et al.  Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty. , 2014, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[33]  J. Jennings,et al.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis , 2013, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[34]  Taylor J. Abel,et al.  Flexion-distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine: open fusion versus percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[35]  Jin-Sung Kim,et al.  Radiation Exposure to the Surgeon During Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Prospective Study , 2013, Spine.

[36]  V. Rahimi-Movaghar,et al.  Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/ discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[37]  R. Fessler,et al.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery—evolution of minimally invasive techniques , 2012, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[38]  K. Lees,et al.  Letter by Kerr and Lees regarding article, "country comparisons of human stroke research since 2001: a bibliometric study". , 2012, Stroke.

[39]  O. Persson,et al.  Country Comparisons of Human Stroke Research Since 2001: A Bibliometric Study , 2012, Stroke.

[40]  E. Benzel,et al.  Minimally Invasive versus Open Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review , 2011, Global spine journal.

[41]  H. Lee,et al.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Thoracic Discectomy; Transforaminal Approach , 2010, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[42]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[43]  L. Bornmann,et al.  The state of h index research , 2009, EMBO reports.

[44]  Seungcheol Lee,et al.  Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[45]  Y. Choi,et al.  Subcutaneous granuloma annulare: an unusual presentation in the eyelids and scalp. , 2005 .

[46]  Seungcheol Lee,et al.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Intracanalicular Disc Herniations at L5–S1 Using a Rigid Working Channel Endoscope , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[47]  Ho-Yeon Lee,et al.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Disc Herniation: Surgical Technique, Outcome, and Prognostic Factors of 43 Consecutive Cases , 2004, Spine.

[48]  Mark A. Reiley,et al.  New Technologies in Spine: Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Compression Fractures , 2001, Spine.

[49]  E. Kogias,et al.  Minimally invasive tubular microdiscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[50]  J. Manson,et al.  Prospective Study of , 2007 .

[51]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  CiteSpace II: Visualization and Knowledge Discovery in Bibliographic Databases , 2005, AMIA.

[52]  A. Yeung Minimally Invasive Disc Surgery with the Yeung Endoscopic Spine System (YESS). , 1999, Surgical technology international.

[53]  J. Regan Percutaneous endoscopic thoracic discectomy. , 1996, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[54]  S. Hijikata Percutaneous nucleotomy. A new concept technique and 12 years' experience. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[55]  H. Deramond,et al.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty]. , 1987, Neuro-Chirurgie.