Motor cortex lesions do not affect learning or performance of the eyeblink response in rabbits.

The possible modulatory role of motor cortex in classical conditioning of the eyeblink response was examined by ablating anterior neocortex in rabbits and training them with an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) and an airpuff unconditioned stimulus (US) in either a delay (Experiment 1) or a trace (Experiment 2) conditioning paradigm. Topographic measures such as amplitude and onset latency were assessed during conditioning sessions for conditioned responses (CRs) and on separate test days for unconditioned responses (URs) by using a range of US intensities. No lesion effects were observed for learning or performance measures in acquisition or retention of either delay or trace conditioning. During trace conditioning, lesioned rabbits did, however, exhibit a trend toward impairment and demonstrated significantly longer CR latencies. Damage to motor and frontal cortex does not significantly affect eyeblink response performance or learning in either a delay or a trace conditioning paradigm.

[1]  R. Clark,et al.  Neural unit activity in the trigeminal complex with interpositus or red nucleus inactivation during classical eyeblink conditioning. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[2]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  C. Woody,et al.  Conditioned eye blink using electrical stimulation of coronal-precruciate cortex as conditional stimulus. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  HighWire Press.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[5]  Retention and acquisition of classical trace conditioned responses by rabbits with hippocampal lesions. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  M. Wiesendanger,et al.  The corticopontine system in the rat. II. The projection pattern , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Retention of classically conditioned eyelid responses following acute decerebration , 1987, Brain Research.

[8]  M. Cole.  The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behavior. , 1964 .

[9]  J. Falk.  Physiology and Behavior. , 1973 .

[10]  J S Buchwald,et al.  Classical conditioning with auditory discrimination of the eye blink in decerebrate cats. , 1977, Science.

[11]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Organization of memory traces in the mammalian brain. , 1994, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Cerebellum and motor control , 1998 .

[13]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Initial localization of the acoustic conditioned stimulus projection system to the cerebellum essential for classical eyelid conditioning. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Role of the Hippocampus in Classical Conditioning of Aversive and Appetitive Behaviors , 1986 .

[15]  W. H. Marshall,et al.  Spreading cortical depression of Leao. , 1959, Physiological reviews.

[16]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Society for Neuroscience Abstracts , 1997 .

[17]  Joseph E. Steinmetz,et al.  An inexpensive interface for the IBM PC/XT and compatibles , 1989 .

[18]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Classical conditioning induces CS-specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig , 1990, Brain Research.

[19]  J. M. Warren,et al.  THE FRONTAL GRANULAR CORTEX AND BEHAVIOR , 1964 .

[20]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Disruption of classical eyelid conditioning after cerebellar lesions: damage to a memory trace system or a simple performance deficit? , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Houk.  Cooperative Control of Limb Movements by the Motor Cortex, Brainstem and , 1989 .

[22]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Neuronal plasticity in the limbic system during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. I. The hippocampus , 1978, Brain Research.

[23]  J. Steinmetz,et al.  Involvement of the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus in rabbit classical eyeblink conditioning , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Classical conditioning rapidly induces specific changes in frequency receptive fields of single neurons in secondary and ventral ectosylvian auditory cortical fields , 1986, Brain Research.

[25]  M. W. Hof,et al.  The hopping reaction in the rabbit after early and late removal of the motor cortex , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  D. Oakley,et al.  Subcortical storage of pavlovian conditioning in the rabbit , 1977, Physiology & Behavior.

[27]  Karen D. Davis,et al.  Modulatory influences of red nucleus stimulation on the somatosensory responses of cat trigeminal subnucleus oralis neurons , 1986, Experimental Neurology.

[28]  Michael Davis.  The Mammalian Startle Response , 1984 .

[29]  Richard F. Thompson.  9 – Neural Circuit for Classical Conditioning of the Eyelid Closure Response , 1989 .

[30]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  A nonrecoverable learning deficit , 1984 .

[31]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Posttrial electrical stimulation of the dorsal hippocampus facilitates acquisition of the nictitating membrane response. , 1983, Behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  W. B. Orr,et al.  Hippocampectomy selectively disrupts discrimination reversal conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  M. O'connor,et al.  Motor areas of the cerebral cortex , 1987 .

[34]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Effect of kainic acid lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus on eyelid conditioning in the rabbit , 1985, Brain Research.

[35]  J J Kim,et al.  Hippocampectomy impairs the memory of recently, but not remotely, acquired trace eyeblink conditioned responses. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[36]  C. Woody,et al.  Effect of lesions of cortical motor areas on acquisition of conditioned eye blink in the cat. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  T W Berger,et al.  Lesions of the retrosplenial cortex produce deficits in reversal learning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response: implications for potential interactions between hippocampal and cerebellar brain systems. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[38]  C. Yeo.  Cerebellum and Classical Conditioning of Motor Responses , 1991, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  The motor cortex and the coding of force. , 1992, Science.

[40]  G. Allen,et al.  Cerebrocerebellar communication systems. , 1974, Physiological reviews.

[41]  J. Bureš,et al.  Unilateral cortical spreading depression and conditioned eyeblink responses in the rabbit. , 1970, Experimental neurology.

[42]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Connections to cerebellar cortex (Larsell's HVI) in the rabbit: a WGA-HRP study with implications for classical eyeblink conditioning. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[43]  C. Ghez,et al.  Red nucleus and motor cortex: Parallel motor systems for the initiation and control of skilled movement , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Spreading depression: Effects of applying potassium chloride to the dura of the rabbit on the conditioned nictitating membrane response , 1965 .

[45]  P. Solomon,et al.  Altered activity in the hippocampus is more detrimental to classical conditioning than removing the structure. , 1983, Science.

[46]  C. Woody,et al.  Changes in unit activity and thresholds to electrical microstimulation at coronal-pericruciate cortex of cat with classical conditioning of different facial movements. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  Theodore W. Berger,et al.  Hippocampal substrate of classical conditioning , 1980 .

[48]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of classical conditioning in mammals. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.