Efficient and Robust Instrument Segmentation in 3D Ultrasound Using Patch-of-Interest-FuseNet with Hybrid Loss

Instrument segmentation plays a vital role in 3D ultrasound (US) guided cardiac intervention. Efficient and accurate segmentation during the operation is highly desired since it can facilitate the operation, reduce the operational complexity, and therefore improve the outcome. Nevertheless, current image-based instrument segmentation methods are not efficient nor accurate enough for clinical usage. Lately, fully convolutional neural networks (FCNs), including 2D and 3D FCNs, have been used in different volumetric segmentation tasks. However, 2D FCN cannot exploit the 3D contextual information in the volumetric data, while 3D FCN requires high computation cost and a large amount of training data. Moreover, with limited computation resources, 3D FCN is commonly applied with a patch-based strategy, which is therefore not efficient for clinical applications. To address these, we propose a POI-FuseNet, which consists of a patch-of-interest (POI) selector and a FuseNet. The POI selector can efficiently select the interested regions containing the instrument, while FuseNet can make use of 2D and 3D FCN features to hierarchically exploit contextual information. Furthermore, we propose a hybrid loss function, which consists of a contextual loss and a class-balanced focal loss, to improve the segmentation performance of the network. With the collected challenging ex-vivo dataset on RF-ablation catheter, our method achieved a Dice score of 70.5%, superior to the state-of-the-art methods. In addition, based on the pre-trained model from ex-vivo dataset, our method can be adapted to the in-vivo dataset on guidewire and achieves a Dice score of 66.5% for a different cardiac operation. More crucially, with POI-based strategy, segmentation efficiency is reduced to around 1.3 seconds per volume, which shows the proposed method is promising for clinical use.

[1]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Ross B. Girshick,et al.  Mask R-CNN , 2017, 1703.06870.

[3]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[4]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Projection-Based Phase Features for Localization of a Needle Tip in 2D Curvilinear Ultrasound , 2015, MICCAI.

[5]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Tool Localization in 3D Ultrasound Images , 2003, MICCAI.

[6]  Ilker Hacihaliloglu,et al.  Learning needle tip localization from digital subtraction in 2D ultrasound , 2019, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[7]  Mingyue Ding,et al.  Automatic needle segmentation in 3D ultrasound images using 3D Hough transform , 2007, International Symposium on Multispectral Image Processing and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Peter H. N. de With,et al.  Medical Instrument Detection in 3-Dimensional Ultrasound Data Volumes , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Vincent Dumoulin,et al.  Deconvolution and Checkerboard Artifacts , 2016 .

[10]  Peter H. N. de With,et al.  Catheter localization in 3D ultrasound using voxel-of-interest-based ConvNets for cardiac intervention , 2019, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[11]  Peter H. N. de With,et al.  Improving Catheter Segmentation & Localization in 3D Cardiac Ultrasound Using Direction-Fused Fcn , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019).

[12]  Hao Chen,et al.  3D Deeply Supervised Network for Automatic Liver Segmentation from CT Volumes , 2016, MICCAI.

[13]  Klaus H. Maier-Hein,et al.  nnU-Net: Breaking the Spell on Successful Medical Image Segmentation , 2019, ArXiv.

[14]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[15]  Peter H. N. de With,et al.  Transferring from ex-vivo to in-vivo: Instrument Localization in 3D Cardiac Ultrasound Using Pyramid-UNet with Hybrid Loss , 2019, MICCAI.

[16]  Chi-Wing Fu,et al.  H-DenseUNet: Hybrid Densely Connected UNet for Liver and Tumor Segmentation From CT Volumes , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Christian Cachard,et al.  Line filtering for surgical tool localization in 3D ultrasound images , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[18]  Emad M. Boctor,et al.  Photoacoustic active ultrasound element for catheter tracking , 2014, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[19]  Ross B. Girshick,et al.  Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  David M. Mills,et al.  Automated catheter detection in volumetric ultrasound , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[21]  Peter H. N. de With,et al.  Efficient Catheter Segmentation in 3D Cardiac Ultrasound using Slice-Based FCN With Deep Supervision and F-Score Loss , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[22]  Charles Hatt,et al.  Enhanced needle localization in ultrasound using beam steering and learning-based segmentation , 2015, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[23]  Christian Cachard,et al.  Automatic Needle Detection and Tracking in 3D Ultrasound Using an ROI-Based RANSAC and Kalman Method , 2013, Ultrasonic imaging.

[24]  J. Duhamel,et al.  Parallel integral projection transform for straight electrode localization in 3-D ultrasound images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  Peter H. N. de With,et al.  Robust and semantic needle detection in 3D ultrasound using orthogonal-plane convolutional neural networks , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[26]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool , 2015, BMC Medical Imaging.

[27]  Hao Chen,et al.  3-D RoI-Aware U-Net for Accurate and Efficient Colorectal Tumor Segmentation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[28]  Muhammad Arif,et al.  Automatic needle detection and real‐time Bi‐planar needle visualization during 3D ultrasound scanning of the liver , 2019, Medical Image Anal..

[29]  Kaiming He,et al.  Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[30]  Caifeng Shan,et al.  Catheter segmentation in three-dimensional ultrasound images by feature fusion and model fitting , 2019, Journal of medical imaging.

[31]  Xu Wang,et al.  Towards Automatic Semantic Segmentation in Volumetric Ultrasound , 2017, MICCAI.

[32]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[33]  George Papandreou,et al.  Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation , 2018, ECCV.

[34]  Alexandre Krupa,et al.  Intensity-Based Visual Servoing for Instrument and Tissue Tracking in 3D Ultrasound Volumes , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[35]  Robert Rohling,et al.  Detection of an invisible needle in ultrasound using a probabilistic SVM and time‐domain features , 2017, Ultrasonics.

[36]  Konstantinos Kamnitsas,et al.  Anatomically Constrained Neural Networks (ACNNs): Application to Cardiac Image Enhancement and Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.