An ecosystem approach to teacher professional development within computer science

ABSTRACT Computer Science (CS) curricula are being adopted worldwide. However, the lack of prior teaching training within this area means that we have an urgent need to provide teacher professional development. Best practice teacher professional development motivates us to construct interactive and sustainable models of professional development. However, there are challenges in doing this at the scale that we need and with the resources that are available. In this paper, we describe an ecosystem-based approach to supporting teacher professional development, aligned with best practices and with teachers’ and schools’ needs. An ecosystem approach operates under the coordination of a governance model, features a central hub and conceptualises the relationships of the organisations as a network. Ecosystems are underpinned by value co-creation, shared logic and can be non-geographical. We believe an ecosystem view of a teacher professional development program supports sustainability, authenticity and flexibility in how teachers engage with professional development, positioning teachers as co-contributors.

[1]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Unpacking teachers' acceptance of technology: Tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Vehbi Celik,et al.  Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Margaret M. Lloyd,et al.  Celtic Knots: Interweaving the Elements of Effective Teacher Professional Development in ICT , 2006 .

[4]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[5]  Bruce Brown.  A systems thinking perspective on change processes in a Teacher Professional Development programme , 2017 .

[6]  Sue Sentance,et al.  The network of teaching excellence in computer science and master teachers , 2014, WiPSCE.

[7]  Nickolas J. G. Falkner,et al.  The Australian digital technologies curriculum: challenge and opportunity , 2014, ACE.

[8]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[9]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[10]  David Pedder,et al.  Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning , 2011 .

[11]  Barbara Ericson,et al.  Preparing secondary computer science teachers through an iterative development process , 2014, WiPSCE.

[12]  Peng Zhang,et al.  A survey on computer science K-12 outreach: Teacher training programs , 2011, 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[13]  Helen Timperley,et al.  Reframing Teacher Professional Learning: An Alternative Policy Approach to Strengthening Valued Outcomes for Diverse Learners , 2008 .

[14]  Rita Kop,et al.  The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course , 2011 .

[15]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching Patterns of Engagement in Connectivist Moocs , 2022 .

[16]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[17]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. , 2009 .

[18]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Teacher adoption of technology , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Jie-Qi Chen,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Teacher Professional Development: The Whole Teacher Approach , 2012 .

[20]  Emil J. Posavac,et al.  Program Evaluation: Methods and Case Studies , 1980 .

[21]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  The case study approach , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[22]  Silvia Wen-Yu Lee,et al.  Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement , 2007 .

[23]  D. Beijaard,et al.  Improving Teacher Feedback During Active Learning , 2014 .

[24]  Atef Abuhmaid.  FOR TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT , 2011 .

[25]  Karen Seashore Louis,et al.  Teachers’ Professional Community in Restructuring Schools , 1996 .

[26]  J. Little.  The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers' Professional Relations , 1990, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[27]  Lori L. Pollock,et al.  From Professional Development to the Classroom: Findings from CS K-12 Teachers , 2017, SIGCSE.

[28]  Tom Karmel,et al.  The Impact of School Academic Quality on Low Socioeconomic Status Students , 2014 .

[29]  Jennifer York-Barr,et al.  What Do We Know About Teacher Leadership? Findings From Two Decades of Scholarship , 2004 .

[30]  Michael S. Knapp,et al.  Chapter 4:Professional Development as a Policy Pathway , 2003 .

[31]  M. Kooy,et al.  Teacher learning that matters: international perspectives , 2012 .

[32]  Mike Willett,et al.  National Teaching Workforce Dataset: data analysis report , 2014 .

[33]  Joanna Goode,et al.  Curriculum is not enough: the educational theory and research foundation of the exploring computer science professional development model , 2014, SIGCSE.

[34]  Jeffrey Paul Carpenter,et al.  "Together we are better": Professional learning networks for teachers , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[36]  S. Loucks-Horsley.  Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[37]  Muhsin Menekse,et al.  Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: a review of studies published between 2004 and 2014 , 2015, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[38]  Luciana Benotti,et al.  Lessons Learned on Computer Science Teachers Professional Development , 2016, ITiCSE.

[39]  David Chen,et al.  General system theory: Toward a conceptual framework for science and technology education for all , 1993 .

[40]  Susan H. Rodger,et al.  K-12 Teachers Experiences with Computing: A Case Study , 2017, ITiCSE.

[41]  NEIL C. C. BROWN,et al.  Restart: The Resurgence of Computer Science in UK Schools , 2014, TOCE.

[42]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[43]  Nickolas J. G. Falkner,et al.  Reflecting on Three Offerings of a Community-Centric MOOC for K-6 Computer Science Teachers , 2017, SIGCSE.

[44]  Timothy C. Bell,et al.  A Case Study of the Introduction of Computer Science in NZ Schools , 2014, TOCE.

[45]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Supporting Professional Learning in a Massive Open Online Course. , 2014 .

[46]  Minjeong Park,et al.  Teachers' perceptions of the recent curriculum reforms and their implementation: what can we learn from the case of Korean elementary teachers? , 2013 .

[47]  Simon L. Peyton Jones,et al.  Bringing computer science back into schools: lessons from the UK , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[48]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Powerful Learning Communities: A Guide to Developing Student, Faculty, and Professional Learning Communities to Improve Student Success and Organizational Effectiveness , 2013 .

[49]  Brian Dorn,et al.  Understanding the "Teacher Experience" in Primary and Secondary CS Professional Development , 2017, ICER.

[50]  Iolanda Garcia,et al.  Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review , 2016 .

[51]  Kevin Wang,et al.  TEALS: Teacher Professional Development Using Industry Volunteers , 2016, SIGCSE.

[52]  J. B. Kahle,et al.  Promoting Inquiry-Based Instructional Practice: The Longitudinal Impact of Professional Development in the Context of Systemic Reform , 2000 .

[53]  Llewellyn D. W. Thomas,et al.  The Fifth Facet: The Ecosystem as an Organizational Field , 2014 .

[54]  Charles DeBose,et al.  Promoting a self-sustaining learning community: investigating an internal model for teacher development , 2004 .

[55]  Joseph Jay Williams,et al.  HarvardX and MITx: Two Years of Open Online Courses Fall 2012-Summer 2014 , 2015 .

[56]  Manfred Prenzel,et al.  Expert views on the implementation of teacher professional development in European countries , 2011 .