Subject matter effects and the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study

Abstract This paper integrates the emerging literatures of empirical research on the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework and disciplinary effects in online teaching and learning by examining the disciplinary differences in perceptions of social, teaching, and cognitive presence of over 1500 students in seven disciplines at two U.S. institutions. Our results found significant disciplinary differences, particularly regarding cognitive presence, in soft, applied disciplines relative to other disciplines. These initial results suggest the possibility that the CoI framework may be more applicable to applied disciplines than pure disciplines. Our findings suggest interesting opportunities for future researchers to consider how the individual elements of the CoI framework may influence and be influenced by academic disciplines and how the framework may need to be refined or modified to explain effective course conduct in pure disciplines.

[1]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  Purchasing Education on the Internet , 1999 .

[2]  D. Garrison,et al.  Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Modes of Interaction in Distance Education: Recent Developments and Research Questions , 2003 .

[5]  Colla J. MacDonald,et al.  Structure, Content, Delivery, Service, and Outcomes: Quality e-Learning in higher education , 2005 .

[6]  Richard G. Milter,et al.  Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning Approaches: Applying Knowledge to Authentic Situations , 2009 .

[7]  Tony Becher,et al.  Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis , 2002 .

[8]  Dahli Helmi,et al.  Internet Teaching Methods Across The Disciplines , 2011 .

[9]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[10]  Holly H. Brower,et al.  On Emulating Classroom Discussion in a Distance-Delivered OBHR Course: Creating an On-Line Learning Community , 2003 .

[11]  L. Ellram,et al.  Toward a Typology of Business Education in the Internet Age , 2004 .

[12]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Lessons from the Cyberspace Classroom , 2001 .

[13]  Janette R. Hill,et al.  Collaborate to Learn, Learn to Collaborate: Examining the Roles of Context, Community, and Cognition in Asynchronous Discussion , 2007 .

[14]  J. Arbaugh.  How Much Does “Subject Matter” Matter? A Study of Disciplinary Effects in On-Line MBA Courses , 2005 .

[15]  M. Lipman.  Thinking in Education , 1992 .

[16]  Joe E. Wheaton,et al.  Bridging the Transactional Distance Gap in Online Learning Environments , 2005 .

[17]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[18]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[19]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  Learning in Communities of Inquiry: A Review of the Literature , 2009 .

[20]  Karen Swan,et al.  Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: An application of Grice's cooperative principle , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Dialogue: a theoretical framework for distance education instructional systems , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  Barbara L. Rau,et al.  A Study of Disciplinary, Structural, and Behavioral Effects on Course Outcomes in Online MBA Courses , 2007 .

[23]  Robert A. Wisher,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF WEB-BASED AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: , 2006 .

[24]  Raven Wallace,et al.  Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students , 2003 .

[25]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Karen Swan,et al.  Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[27]  Jeff Anstine,et al.  A Small Sample Study of Traditional and Online Courses with Sample Selection Adjustment , 2005 .

[28]  A. Hwang,et al.  Does "teaching presence" exist in online MBA courses? , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[29]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Does the Community of Inquiry Framework Predict Outcomes in Online MBA Courses , 2007 .

[30]  Natalie S. Berger,et al.  Pioneering Experiences in Distance Learning: Lessons Learned , 1999 .

[31]  Lisa A. Burke,et al.  A Perennial Dilemma in OB Education: Engaging the Traditional Student , 2003 .

[32]  Gila Kurtz,et al.  Psychosocial Well-Being of Israeli Students and Attitudes toward Open and Distance Learning , 2009 .

[33]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  A Comparative Study of Distributed Learning Environments on Learning Outcomes , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An empirical investigation of virtual Interaction in supporting learning , 2008, DATB.

[35]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[36]  Jana Malovicova,et al.  Critical and Higher Order Thinking in Online Threaded Discussions in the Slovak Context , 2009 .

[37]  R. Neumann.  Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching , 2001 .

[38]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[39]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Glenn Gordon Smith,et al.  E-learning commodity or community: Disciplinary differences between online courses , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[41]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Tony Becher.  The significance of disciplinary differences , 1994 .

[43]  A. Field.  Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. , 2000 .

[44]  L. Shulman.  Forum: Teaching as Community Property , 1993 .

[45]  T. Kuhn.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[46]  Yong Zhao,et al.  What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[47]  Arthur Bangert,et al.  The influence of social presence and teaching presence on the quality of online critical inquiry , 2008, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[48]  Peter Shea,et al.  Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster "epistemic engagement" and "cognitive presence" in online education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[49]  A. P. Rovai.  Development of an instrument to measure classroom community , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[50]  Grandon Gill,et al.  Teaching with the Case Method Online: Pure versus Hybrid Approaches. , 2005 .

[51]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Collaborative learning and computer‐supported groups , 1999 .

[52]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[53]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[54]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research , 2006 .

[55]  Michael G. Moore,et al.  Handbook of distance education , 2007 .

[56]  Sarah Schrire,et al.  Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[57]  David E. Hansen.  Knowledge Transfer in Online Learning Environments , 2008 .

[58]  A. Biglan.  The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. , 1973 .

[59]  Steven Hornik,et al.  An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[60]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Going the Distance With Online Education , 2006 .

[61]  C. Gunawardena.  Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences , 1995 .

[62]  Marilyn A. Dyrud,et al.  The Third Wave: A Position Paper , 2000 .

[63]  Robert A. Kozak,et al.  Identifying Effective Pedagogical Approaches for Online Workplace Training: A case study of the South African wood products manufacturing sector , 2007 .

[64]  Andrew R. Brown,et al.  Elements of Effective e-Learning Design , 2005 .

[65]  Gary L. May,et al.  Gardening in Cyberspace: A Metaphor to Enhance Online Teaching and Learning , 2003 .

[66]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Exploring the Myths about Online Education in Information Systems , 2005, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[67]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring the Optimal Experience of the eLearning Environment , 2007 .

[68]  Erman Yükseltürk,et al.  Investigation of Interaction, Online Support, Course Structure and Flexibility as the Contributing Factors to Students' Satisfaction in an Online Certificate Program , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[69]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  Is There an Optimal Design for On-Line MBA Courses? , 2005 .

[70]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich.  Improving education and training with IT , 2002, CACM.

[71]  Charles D. Dziuban,et al.  The Impact of Paradigm Development and Course Level on Performance in Technology-Mediated Learning Environments , 2008, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[72]  David DiBiase,et al.  Is distance teaching more work or less work? , 2000 .

[73]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Virtual Classroom: Learning Without Limits Via Computer Networks , 1994 .

[74]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[75]  James W. Peltier,et al.  Course content or the instructor: which is more important in on‐line teaching? , 2002 .

[76]  Steven J. Armstrong,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development , 2009 .

[77]  William Wresch,et al.  Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions , 2009, Internet High. Educ..

[78]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Developing, testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer‐mediated conferencing , 2004 .