Characterizing Representational Learning: A Combined Simulation and Tutorial on Perturbation Theory.

Analyzing, constructing, and translating between graphical, pictorial, and mathematical representations of physics ideas and reasoning flexibly through them (“representational competence”) is a key characteristic of expertise in physics but is a challenge for learners to develop. Interactive computer simulations and University of Washington style tutorials both have affordances to support representational learning. This article describes work to characterize students’ spontaneous use of representations before and after working with a combined simulation and tutorial on first-order energy corrections in the context of quantummechanical time-independent perturbation theory. Data were collected from two institutions using pre-, mid-, and post-tests to assess shortand long-term gains. A representational competence level framework was adapted to devise level descriptors for the assessment items. The results indicate an increase in the number of representations used by students and the consistency between them following the combined simulation tutorial. The distributions of representational competence levels suggest a shift from perceptual to semantic use of representations based on their underlying meaning. In terms of activity design, this study illustrates the need to support students in making sense of the representations shown in a simulation and in learning to choose the most appropriate representation for a given task. In terms of characterizing representational abilities, this study illustrates the usefulness of a framework focusing on perceptual, syntactic, and semantic use of representations.

[1]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[2]  John Airey,et al.  A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes , 2009 .

[3]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format , 2005 .

[4]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Relations between Types of Reasoning and Computational Representations , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[5]  Manjula D. Sharma,et al.  How online learning modules can improve the representational fluency and conceptual understanding of university physics students , 2015 .

[6]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Students Becoming Chemists: Developing Representationl Competence , 2005 .

[7]  Anna Campbell,et al.  Enhancing student learning of two-level quantum systems with interactive simulations , 2015, 1501.07905.

[8]  A. diSessa Metarepresentation: Native Competence and Targets for Instruction , 2004 .

[9]  M. D. Cock,et al.  Representation use and Strategy choice in physics problem solving , 2012 .

[10]  Sahana Murthy,et al.  Scientific Abilities and Their Assessment. , 2006 .

[11]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  E. Price,et al.  Structural features of algebraic quantum notations , 2015 .

[13]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  N. Finkelstein,et al.  Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving , 2008 .

[15]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[16]  Alexandru Maries,et al.  Challenges in designing appropriate scaffolding to improve students' representational consistency: The case of a Gauss's law problem , 2017 .

[17]  Noah D. Finkelstein,et al.  Student representational competence and self-assessment when solving physics problems , 2005 .

[18]  Neff Walker,et al.  A classification of visual representations , 1994, CACM.

[19]  Michael E. Loverude Assessment to complement research-based instruction in upper-level physics courses , 2012 .

[20]  P. V. Meter,et al.  The Promise and Practice of Learner-Generated Drawing: Literature Review and Synthesis , 2005 .

[21]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Solving physics problems with multiple representations , 1997 .

[22]  Jan T. van der Veen,et al.  The learning effects of computer simulations in science education , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[23]  R. Pintó,et al.  Identifying secondary-school students’ difficulties when reading visual representations displayed in physics simulations , 2017 .

[24]  M. Stieff Improving Representational Competence Using Molecular Simulations Embedded in Inquiry Activities , 2011 .

[25]  Manjula D. Sharma,et al.  Students' Representational Fluency at University: A Cross-Sectional Measure of How Multiple Representations Are Used by Physics Students Using the Representational Fluency Survey. , 2015 .

[26]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations , 2010 .

[27]  Kevin A Hallgren,et al.  Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. , 2012, Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology.

[28]  Steven J. Pollock,et al.  Replicating and understanding successful innovations: Implementing tutorials in introductory physics , 2005 .

[29]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[30]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[31]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Drawing to Learn in Science , 2011, Science.