Extraction of spatially sparse common spatio-spectral filters with recursive weight elimination

The common spatial pattern(CSP) technique linearly combines the channels to filter the neural signal spatially. It operates on data that is band-pass filtered between particular cutoff frequency for all subjects and channels. On the other hand the common spatio-spectral pattern (CSSP) method extends the the traditional CSP technique that combines spectral filtering with the original spatial filtering by using the temporally delayed version of the original data. All recording channels and the delayed versions are combined when extracting the variance as input features for a brain machine interface. This linear combination increases the number of channels extensively and results in overfitting and robustness problems of the constructed system in presence of low number of training trials. To overcome this problem, we proposed spatially sparse CSSP method in which only a subset of all available channels and its temporally shifted versions are linearly combined when extracting the features. We utilized three different versions of the recursive weight elimination (RWE) technique to select a subset of electrodes for spatio-spectral projections. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method to distinguish between the movements of the first three fingers of the hand using electrocorticogram (ECoG) signals of the brain computer interface competition 2005. We observed that spatially sparse CSSP filter outperforms both original CSP and CSSP filter and results in improved generalization in classification.

[1]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  Inhyuk Moon,et al.  Design of robotic hand with tendon-driven three fingers , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems.

[3]  Ahmed H. Tewfik,et al.  Sparse common spatial patterns in brain computer interface applications , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[4]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Spatio-spectral filters for improving the classification of single trial EEG , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  A. Enis Çetin,et al.  Sparse spatial filter via a novel objective function minimization with smooth ℓ1 regularization , 2013, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[6]  Jason Weston,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[7]  Nuri Firat Ince,et al.  Sparse common spatial patterns with recursive weight elimination , 2011, 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[8]  Selina Wriessnegger,et al.  Regularised CSP for Sensor Selection in BCI , 2006 .

[9]  Boris Reuderink,et al.  Robustness of the Common Spatial Patterns algorithm in the BCI-pipeline , 2008 .

[10]  Ahmed H. Tewfik,et al.  High Accuracy Decoding of Movement Target Direction in Non-Human Primates Based on Common Spatial Patterns of Local Field Potentials , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Combined Optimization of Spatial and Temporal Filters for Improving Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[13]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Optimizing the Channel Selection and Classification Accuracy in EEG-Based BCI , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Lester W. Mackey,et al.  Deflation Methods for Sparse PCA , 2008, NIPS.