The meaning of nonprofit advocacy: An ordonomic perspective

Abstract Orthodox economic theories of the nonprofit sector are focused on its service delivery role but have little to say about nonprofit advocacy. This study explains nonprofit advocacy by building upon the ordonomic approach, a recently developed strand of institutional economics that explores the interdependencies between institutions and ideas. From the ordonomic perspective, the evolution of a modern society occurs through an ongoing realignment between institutions and ideas. The meaning of nonprofit advocacy is shown to be in contributing to this realignment. This leads to a new understanding of the service delivery role of the nonprofit sector. This role is shown to have a compensatory character in that it is intended to maintain a reasonable quality of human life before the time-consuming ideational and institutional adjustments actually take place.

[1]  The Right Price of Food , 2011 .

[2]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[3]  J. R. Commons.  Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy, Volume 2 , 1989 .

[4]  F. Hayek.  Freedom and the economic system , 1940 .

[5]  F. Gregory Hayden,et al.  Policymaking for a Good Society: The Social Fabric Matrix Approach to Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation , 2005 .

[6]  J. Magrath,et al.  New Dimensions of Global Advocacy , 1999 .

[7]  L. Mises,et al.  Human Action: A Treatise on Economics , 1949 .

[8]  Miriam K. Ringo,et al.  Business and Society , 1964 .

[9]  I. Pies,et al.  In search for rules that secure gains from cooperation: the heuristic value of social dilemmas for normative institutional economics , 2007 .

[10]  R. Steinberg.  Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations , 2003 .

[11]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[12]  B. Helmig,et al.  Replication Studies in Nonprofit Research , 2012 .

[13]  V. Valentinov,et al.  How to Foster Social Progress: An Ordonomic Perspective on Progressive Institutional Change , 2012 .

[14]  Elisabeth Naima Mikkelsen.  An Analysis of the Social Meanings of Conflict in Nonprofit Organizations , 2013 .

[15]  John Kenneth Galbraith,et al.  American Capitalism; The Concept of Countervailing Power , 1952 .

[16]  Marc R. Tool.  The Discretionary Economy , 1985 .

[17]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1973 .

[18]  R. Lohmann.  And Lettuce Is Nonanimal: Toward a Positive Economics of Voluntary Action , 1989 .

[19]  Thorstein Veblen,et al.  Theory of Business Enterprise , 1904 .

[20]  V. Valentinov.  Mapping the Third Sector in John R. Commons' Typology of Transactions , 2009 .

[21]  Virgil Hawkins.  The Other Side of the CNN Factor: the media and conflict , 2002 .

[22]  Markus Beckmann,et al.  Commitment strategies for sustainability: how business firms can transform trade-offs into win-win outcomes , 2014 .

[23]  Marc R. Tool.  The Theory of Institutional Adjustment , 2000 .

[24]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik : Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft , 1983 .

[25]  Alan Hudson.  Advocacy by UK-Based Development NGOs , 2002 .

[26]  Malcolm Rutherford.  Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy , 1989 .

[27]  R. Dukes,et al.  With strings attached: Philanthropic funding and greater inclusiveness , 2013 .

[28]  Matthias G. Will,et al.  Is Financial Speculation with Agricultural Commodities Harmful or Helpful? – A Literature Review of Current Empirical Research , 2015 .

[29]  Stefan Hielscher,et al.  The Political Role of the Business Firm , 2014 .

[30]  Markus Beckmann,et al.  Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship: An Ordonomic Approach to Business Ethics in the Age of Globalization , 2010 .

[31]  Markus Beckmann,et al.  Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship , 2009, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[32]  Y. Hasenfeld,et al.  Institutional Logics, Moral Frames, and Advocacy , 2014 .

[33]  V. Valentinov,et al.  The Nonprofit Catallaxy: An Austrian Economics Perspective on the Nonprofit Sector , 2014 .

[34]  Walter Eucken,et al.  Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik , 1955 .

[35]  P. Bush,et al.  The Theory of Institutional Change , 1987, Evolutionary Economics.

[36]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups , 1969 .

[37]  Jennifer Keahey,et al.  Policymaking for a Good Society: The Social Fabric Matrix Approach to Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation , 2007 .

[38]  H. Schmid,et al.  Advocacy Activities in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations , 2008 .

[39]  R. J. Foster.  Corporate oxymorons and the anthropology of corporations , 2010 .

[40]  L. Salamon,et al.  The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective , 2006 .

[41]  P. Benson,et al.  Corporate oxymorons , 2010 .

[42]  Sarah N. Deschenes,et al.  Advocacy Organizations and the Field of Youth Services: Ongoing Efforts to Restructure a Field , 2006 .

[43]  Burton A. Weisbrod,et al.  Modeling the nonprofit organization as a multiproduct firm: A framework for choice , 1998 .

[44]  Wolfram Elsner.  The Theory of Institutional Change Revisited: The Institutional Dichotomy, Its Dynamic, and Its Policy Implications in a More Formal Analysis , 2012 .

[45]  V. Valentinov.  The economics of the nonprofit sector: Insights from the institutionalism of John R. Commons , 2012 .