Impact assessment of a fisheries closure with effort and landings spatial analyses: A case study in the Western Baltic Sea

Abstract Commercial fisheries in the Western Baltic Sea (WBS; ICES Subdivisions 22–24) are dominated by Danish and German vessels. By combining and processing logbook and Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) data for Germany and Denmark, we compare patterns of spatial effort allocation and the origin of the landings before (2005–2007) and during (2008–2010) implementation of the EU long-term management plan (LTMP) for cod. This management plan is likely to have affected the temporal and spatial extent of fisheries in the WBS. Changes that took place between 2005 and 2010 on the large scale of the WBS were therefore considered when selecting an appropriate stable reference period to inform and evaluate small-scale effort-displacement scenarios in the Fehmarn Belt. The WBS fisheries appear not to have been restricted by effort limits until 2010, but rather by total allowable catches (TACs) for cod. The amount of cod landed in the WBS decreased, and the origin of these landings shifted farther east without affecting the seasonal effort allocation. Landings of cod have also decreased in the Fehmarn Belt area, and since 2008, sprat has been the species most landed there. The planned construction of the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link connecting Denmark and Germany could lead to the temporal closure of fishing activities. Three different effort-displacement scenarios were tested to determine how lost landings, caused by a fishing closure of a corridor near the link during construction, could be counteracted by moving the activities to a nearfield area. To compensate for lost landings, the best strategy appears to be redistributing fishing effort of sprat-targeting metiers to areas that have had relatively high catch rates (landings per unit of effort (LPUE)) or with large absolute sprat landings, assuming spatial stability of sprat distribution in the area. Because high effort did not lead to large sprat landings in all locations, effort displacement to high effort areas may not compensate for lost sprat landings, particularly for mixed fishery metiers that also landed herring.

[1]  H. Gerritsen,et al.  Spatial patterns in the retained catch composition of Irish demersal otter trawlers: High-resolution fisheries data as a management tool , 2012 .

[2]  J. Sutinen.  What works well and why: evidence from fishery-management experiences in OECD countries , 1999 .

[3]  Bo Sølgaard Andersen,et al.  Effects of fishing effort allocation scenarios on energy efficiency and profitability: an individual-based model applied to Danish fisheries. , 2010 .

[4]  Jesper Boje,et al.  Report of the Baltic Fisheries Assessment Working Group (WGBFAS), 10-17 April 2013, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen , 2011 .

[5]  Gerjan J. Piet,et al.  VMStools: Open-source software for the processing, analysis and visualisation of fisheries logbook and VMS data , 2012 .

[6]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Predicting the effects of area closures and fishing effort restrictions on the production, biomass, and species richness of benthic invertebrate communities , 2006 .

[7]  C. T. Marshall,et al.  Lessons learned from stock collapse and recovery of North Sea herring: a review , 2010 .

[8]  J. Rasmus Nielsen,et al.  DISPLACE: a dynamic, individual-based model for spatial fishing planning and effort displacement — integrating underlying fish population models , 2014 .

[9]  R. Oeberst,et al.  Seasonal maturity development of Baltic cod in different spawning areas: importance of the Arkona Sea for the summer spawning stock , 2009 .

[10]  Etienne Rivot,et al.  Identifying fishing trip behaviour and estimating fishing effort from VMS data using Bayesian Hidden Markov Models , 2010 .

[11]  J. Horwood,et al.  Evaluation of closed areas for fish stock conservation , 2008 .

[12]  A. Rijnsdorp,et al.  Ecological and economic trade-offs in the management of mixed fisheries: a case study of spawning closures in flatfish fisheries , 2012 .

[13]  Sean Pascoe,et al.  Modelling fishing location choice within mixed fisheries: English North Sea beam trawlers in 2000 and 2001 , 2004 .

[14]  E. Andrulewicz,et al.  The different uses of sea space in Polish Marine Areas: is conflict inevitable? , 2010 .

[15]  Clara Ulrich,et al.  Detailed mapping of fishing effort and landings by coupling fishing logbooks with satellite-recorded vessel geo-location , 2010 .

[16]  R. Oeberst,et al.  Spawning areas of the cod stock in the western Baltic Sea and minimum length at maturity , 2002 .

[17]  R. Aps,et al.  Recovery of depleted Baltic Sea fish stocks: a review , 2010 .

[18]  A. Nissling,et al.  Salinity requirements for successful spawning of Baltic and Belt Sea cod and the potential for cod stock interactions in the Baltic Sea , 1997 .

[19]  F. Douvere,et al.  New perspectives on sea use management: initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  O. Bagge,et al.  The Baltic cod , 1994 .

[21]  O. R. Eigaard,et al.  Integrating individual trip planning in energy efficiency – Building decision tree models for Danish fisheries , 2013 .

[22]  Gerjan J. Piet,et al.  Using MPAs to address regional-scale ecological objectives in the North Sea: modelling the effects of fishing effort displacement , 2009 .

[23]  Søren Anker Pedersen,et al.  Mapping fisheries in the German exclusive economic zone with special reference to offshore Natura 2000 sites , 2009 .

[24]  K. Hüssy.  Review of western Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) recruitment dynamics , 2011 .

[25]  Laurence T. Kell,et al.  Dynamic prediction of effort reallocation in mixed fisheries , 2012 .