Adhesion prevention in gynaecological surgery

OBJECTIVES To review the etiology and incidence of and associative factors in the formation of adhesions following gynaecological surgery. To review evidence for the use of available means of adhesion prevention following gynaecological surgery. OPTIONS Women undergoing pelvic surgery are at risk of developing abdominal and/or pelvic adhesive disease postoperatively. Surgical technique and commercial adhesion prevention systems may decrease the risk of postoperative adhesion formation. OUTCOMES The outcomes measured are the incidence of postoperative adhesions, complications related to the formation of adhesions, and further intervention relative to adhesive disease. EVIDENCE Medline, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched for articles published in English from 1990 to March 2009, using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses specifically addressing postoperative adhesions, adhesion prevention, and adhesive barriers. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to March 2009. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care SUMMARY STATEMENTS: 1. Meticulous surgical technique is a means of preventing adhesions. This includes minimizing tissue trauma, achieving optimal hemostasis, minimizing the risk of infection, and avoiding contaminants (e.g., fecal matter) and the use of foreign materials (e.g., talcum powder) when possible. (II-2). 2. The risk of adhesions increases with the total number of abdominal and pelvic surgeries performed on one patient; every surgery needs to be carefully considered in this context. (II-2). 3. Polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) barrier is more effective than no barrier or oxidized regenerated cellulose in preventing adhesion formation. (I). 4. Oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed) adhesion barrier is associated with a reduced incidence of pelvic adhesion formation at both laparoscopy and laparotomy when complete hemostasis is achieved. Oxidized regenerated cellulose may increase the risk of adhesions if optimal hemostasis is not achieved. (II-2). 5. Chemically modified sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) is effective in preventing adhesion formation, especially following myomectomies. There is insufficient evidence on the effect of sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose on long-term clinical outcomes such as fertility, chronic pelvic pain or small bowel obstruction. (II-2). 6. No adverse effects have been reported with the use of oxidized regenerated cellulose, polytetrafluoroethylene, or sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose. (II-1). 7. Various pharmacological agents have been marketed as a means of preventing adhesions. None of these agents are presently available in Canada. There is insufficient evidence for the use of pharmacological agents in preventing adhesions. (III-C). RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Surgeons should attempt to perform surgical procedures using the least invasive method possible in order to decrease the risk of adhesion formation. (II-1B ). When feasible, for example, a laparoscopic surgical approach is preferable to an abdominal approach, and a vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferable to an abdominal hysterectomy. 2. Precautions should be taken at surgery to minimize tissue trauma in order to decrease the risk of postoperative adhesions. These precautions include limiting packing, crushing, and manipulating of tissues to what is strictly required for safe completion of the procedure. (III-B). 3. Surgeons could consider using an adhesion barrier for patients who are at high risk of forming clinically significant adhesions (i.e., patients who have endometriosis or pelvic inflammatory disease or who are undergoing a myomectomy). If there is a risk of ongoing bleeding from the surgical site, oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed) should not be used as it may increase the risk of adhesions in this situation. (II-2B).

[1]  An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) reduces post-myomectomy adhesion formation. The Myomectomy Adhesion Multicenter Study Group. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  S. Guerriero,et al.  Reduction of Adhesion Reformation After Laparoscopic Endometriosis Surgery: A Randomized Trial With an Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Absorbable Barrier , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  B. Monk,et al.  Adhesions after extensive gynecologic surgery: clinical significance, etiology, and prevention. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  H. Ellis The causes and prevention of intestinal adhesions , 1982, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  M. Diamond,et al.  Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study. Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  K. Sekiba Use of Interceed(TC7) absorbable adhesion barrier to reduce postoperative adhesion reformation in infertility and endometriosis surgery. The Obstetrics and Gynecology Adhesion Prevention Committee. , 1992, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  Martin Fortin,et al.  Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care , 2012 .

[8]  T. Unterman,et al.  The response of the growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I axis to medical castration in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. , 1994, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  I. Cooke,et al.  The value of an absorbable adhesion barrier, Interceed®, in the prevention of adhesion reformation following microsurgical adhesiolysis , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[10]  R. Lilford,et al.  Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  A. Decherney,et al.  Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation following general surgery and the use of adhesion prevention barriers. , 1997, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[12]  J. Aguilar The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care , 2012 .

[13]  R. Azziz Microsurgery alone or with INTERCEED Absorbable Adhesion Barrier for pelvic sidewall adhesion re-formation. The INTERCEED (TC7) Adhesion Barrier Study Group II. , 1993, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[14]  T. Tulandi,et al.  Adhesion Formation and Reproductive Outcome After Myomectomy and Second-Look Laparoscopy , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  H. Martikainen,et al.  The efficacy of Interceed(TC7)* for prevention of reformation of postoperative adhesions on ovaries, fallopian tubes, and fimbriae in microsurgical operations for fertility: a multicenter study. Nordic Adhesion Prevention Study Group. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  E. Bieber,et al.  Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. , 1997, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[17]  J. Rock,et al.  Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) is superior to oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed TC7+) in preventing adhesions. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  M. Schäfer,et al.  Comparison of Adhesion Formation in Open and Laparoscopic Surgery , 1998, Digestive Surgery.

[19]  D. Al-Jaroudi,et al.  Adhesion Prevention in Gynecologic Surgery , 2004, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[20]  D. Wiseman,et al.  Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[21]  M. Weibel,et al.  Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study. , 1973, American journal of surgery.

[22]  T. Theodosopoulos,et al.  A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[23]  R F Edlich,et al.  Role of inoculation site as a determinant of infection in soft tissue wounds. , 1973, American journal of surgery.

[24]  S. Guerriero,et al.  Prevention of de-novo adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[25]  M. Snoj Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation , 1995, The British journal of surgery.

[26]  J. Jeekel,et al.  Foreign material in postoperative adhesions. , 1996, Annals of surgery.

[27]  T. Li,et al.  Post-operative adhesions after laparoscopic electrosurgical treatment for polycystic ovarian syndrome with the application of Interceed to one ovary: a prospective randomized controlled study. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[28]  U. Ulrich,et al.  Reduction of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[29]  M P Diamond,et al.  Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. , 2001, Human reproduction update.

[30]  C. Flamigni,et al.  Adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy. , 1996, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[31]  R. R. Franklin Reduction of Ovarian Adhesions by the Use of Interceed , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  C. Dervenis,et al.  Peritoneal Adhesions: Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Significance , 2001, Digestive Surgery.