The effects of EMG-triggered functional electrical stimulation on upper extremity function in stroke patients

Objective: The aim of this review is to explore the latest intervention trends and effects of EMG-triggered functional electrical stimulation on the upper extremity functions in stroke patients. Design: Systematic review on clinical trials. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify clinical trials evaluating the effects of EMG triggered functional electrical stimulation (EMG-FES) and task-oriented EMG-triggered FES on the hand functions in stroke patients. Literature review was conducted with the following key words: hand function, functional electrical stimulation, task-oriented, stroke. Results: Ten clinical trials were included; 8 of them were randomized controlled trial, 1 was block-randomized, and 1 was a pre-post comparison study. A positive effect of electrical stimulation was reported in the patient groups that were treated with functional electrical stimulation combined with specific tasks, and volitional muscle contraction-triggered stimulation that was synchronized with tasks. Motor capabilities of the hand and arm were improved after the rehabilitation. Conclusions: EMG-triggered electrical stimulation may be more effective than non-triggered electrical stimulation in facilitating the hand functions in stroke patients in terms of muscle strength and voluntary muscle contraction of the paretic hand and arm. Triggered electrical stimulation can be even more effective when it is combined with specific tasks.

[1]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  Stacy L Fritz,et al.  Active Finger Extension Predicts Outcomes After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Individuals With Hemiparesis After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[3]  J. Cauraugh,et al.  Two Coupled Motor Recovery Protocols Are Better Than One: Electromyogram-Triggered Neuromuscular Stimulation and Bilateral Movements , 2002, Stroke.

[4]  James H. Cauraugh,et al.  Coupled bilateral movements and active neuromuscular stimulation: Intralimb transfer evidence during bimanual aiming , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  S. Page,et al.  Longer versus shorter daily durations of electrical stimulation during task-specific practice in moderately impaired stroke. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Kari Dunning,et al.  Task-specific, patient-driven neuroprosthesis training in chronic stroke: results of a 3-week clinical study. , 2008, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[8]  M. Granat,et al.  Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. , 1999, Stroke.

[9]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: a systematic review of the literature , 2008, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  M. Ladouceur,et al.  Clinical and Therapeutic Applications of Neuromuscular Stimulation: A Review of Current Use and Speculation into Future Developments , 2001, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[11]  G. Alon,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation Enhancement of Upper Extremity Functional Recovery During Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  Sung Ho Jang,et al.  Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients , 2003, Neuroreport.

[14]  J. Carey,et al.  Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  James H. Cauraugh,et al.  Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation , 2003, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[17]  R. Schweizer,et al.  Efficacy of EMG-triggered electrical arm stimulation in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients. , 2009, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[18]  J. Liepert,et al.  Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. , 2000, Stroke.

[19]  A. Behrman,et al.  Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. , 2000, Stroke.

[20]  Yoshihiro Muraoka,et al.  A home-based rehabilitation program for the hemiplegic upper extremity by power-assisted functional electrical stimulation , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[21]  John Chae,et al.  Neuromuscular stimulation for motor relearning in hemiplegia , 1999 .

[22]  Lorie G. Richards,et al.  Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  J. Chae,et al.  Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. , 1998, Stroke.

[24]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Upper-extremity functional electric stimulation-assisted exercises on a workstation in the subacute phase of stroke recovery. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  H. Woldag,et al.  Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients , 2002, Journal of Neurology.

[26]  D. Wade,et al.  Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. , 1986, International rehabilitation medicine.