Chromosomal and allozyme analysis of a hybrid zone between parapatric Robertsonian races of the house mouse: a case of monobrachial homology

A detailed chromosomal and allozyme analysis of Robertsonian (Rb) populations of the house mouse in Alsace (France) was performed to evaluate the model of speciation by monobrachial centric fusions. The karyological analysis confirmed the existence of a hybrid zone between two Rb races differentiated by monobrachially homologous Rb fusions. The clinal distribution of Rb fusions showed that almost no overlap occurred between the Rb fusions specific to each race, indicating the presence of an acrocentric peak in the center of the hybrid zone. Thus, only chromosomal heterozygotes carrying one to three trivalents were present, instead of the expected highly unfit interracial hybrids, none of which were observed. The effect of karyotypic differentiation on genic divergence was tested across the hybrid zone by comparing levels of genetic structure for chromosomal and allozyme markers according to the isolation by distance model. Results confirmed the highly significant spatial structure for chromosomes, but revealed none for allozymes, indicating that genic diversity was not structured according to karyotype. These data suggest the absence of a strong chromosomal barrier to gene flow, which does not conform with predictions of the model of speciation by monobrachial centric fusions. In addition, the relatedness of these Rb races to neighboring ones, as well as the nonrandom contribution of several chromosomes to the Rb fusions, was analyzed.

[1]  Y. Narain,et al.  A hybrid zone between the Hallefors and Uppsala chromosome races of Sorex araneus in central Sweden , 2004 .

[2]  J. Searle,et al.  The effects of Robertsonian fusions on chiasma frequency and distribution in the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) from a hybrid zone in northern Scotland , 2001, Heredity.

[3]  L H. Rieseberg,et al.  Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  J. Piálek,et al.  Raciation and speciation in house mice from the Alps: the role of chromosomes , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[5]  M. J. López-Fuster,et al.  Clinal analysis of a chromosomal hybrid zone in the house mouse. , 2001, Genetical research.

[6]  F. Balloux,et al.  MICROSATELLITES CAN BE MISLEADING: AN EMPIRICAL AND SIMULATION STUDY , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  R. Castiglia,et al.  Contact zone between chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus. 2. Fertility and segregation in laboratory-reared and wild mice heterozygous for multiple Robertsonian rearrangements , 2000, Heredity.

[8]  Maria da Luz Mathias,et al.  Environmental genetics: Rapid chromosomal evolution in island mice , 2000, Nature.

[9]  M. Nachman,et al.  The origin of a Robertsonian chromosomal translocation in house mice inferred from linked microsatellite markers. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  P. Boursot,et al.  Is chromosomal speciation occurring in house mice in Tunisia , 1999 .

[11]  R. Castiglia,et al.  Contact zones between chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus. 1. Temporal analysis of a hybrid zone between the CD chromosomal race (2n=22) and populations with the standard karyotype , 1999, Heredity.

[12]  J. Catalan,et al.  Microgeographical distribution of two chromosomal races of house mice in Tunisia: pattern and origin of habitat partitioning , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  F. Balloux,et al.  Do riverine barriers, history or introgression shape the genetic structuring of a common shrew (Sorex araneus) population? , 1999, Heredity.

[14]  H. Hauffe,et al.  Chromosomal heterozygosity and fertility in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from Northern Italy. , 1998, Genetics.

[15]  M. Rizzoni,et al.  Aneuploidy in metaphases II of spermatocytes of wild house mice from a hybrid zone between a Robertsonian population (CD: 2n = 22) and a population with the standard karyotype (2n = 40) , 1997, Genetica.

[16]  J. Piálek,et al.  Evolution of the chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus in the Rhaetian Alps: the roles of whole-arm reciprocal translocation and zonal raciation , 1997 .

[17]  S. Gavrilets HYBRID ZONES WITH DOBZHANSKY‐TYPE EPISTATIC SELECTION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  H. Hauffe,et al.  Genetic distinctiveness of a village population of house mice: relevance to speciation and chromosomal evolution , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers , 1996, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[20]  Michael Schmid,et al.  Loss of telomeric sites in the chromosomes ofMus musculus domesticus (Rodentia: Muridae) during Robertsonian rearrangements , 1995, Chromosome Research.

[21]  M. Nachman,et al.  Why is the house mouse karyotype so variable? , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  D. Broccoli,et al.  Robertsonian metacentrics of the house mouse lose telomeric sequences but retain some minor satellite DNA in the pericentromeric area , 1995, Chromosoma.

[23]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[24]  J. Searle,et al.  Further studies of a staggered hybrid zone in Mus musculus domesticus (the house mouse) , 1993, Heredity.

[25]  H. Hauffe,et al.  EXTREME KARYOTYPIC VARIATION IN A MUS MUSCULUS DOMESTICUS HYBRID ZONE: THE TOBACCO MOUSE STORY REVISITED , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  M. King Species Evolution: The Role of Chromosome Change , 1993 .

[27]  M T Davisson,et al.  Recombination suppression by heterozygous Robertsonian chromosomes in the mouse. , 1993, Genetics.

[28]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  ISOLATION BY DISTANCE IN EQUILIBRIUM AND NON‐EQUILIBRIUM POPULATIONS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  N. Barton,et al.  A MODEL OF A HYBRID ZONE BETWEEN TWO CHROMOSOMAL RACES OF THE COMMON SHREW (SOREX ARANEUS) , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  J. Searle A hybrid zone comprising staggered chromosomal clines in the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  A. Banaszek,et al.  GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION OF POLISH POPULATIONS OF SOREX ARANEUS L. III. INTERCHROMOSOMAL RECOMBINATION IN A HYBRID ZONE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Khalid Belkhir,et al.  De nouvelles populations robertsoniennes de souris (Mus musculus domesticus) au nord des Alpes , 1991 .

[33]  J. Britton-Davidian,et al.  Genetic differentiation and habitat partition of Robertsonian house mouse populations (Mus musculus domesticus) of Tunisia , 1991 .

[34]  V. Bauchau,et al.  Robertsonian translocations in free‐living populations of the house mouse in Belgium , 1990 .

[35]  V. Bauchau Phylogenetic Analysis of the Distribution of Chromosomal Races of Mus-musculus Domesticus Rutty in Europe , 1990 .

[36]  C. Redi,et al.  Kinetics of oogenesis in mice heterozygous for Robertsonian translocation. , 1990, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[37]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  Karyotype evolution: Evidence from the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.) , 1990 .

[38]  J. Nadeau,et al.  Genic differentiation and origin of Robertsonian populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus Rutty). , 1989, Genetical research.

[39]  N. Barton,et al.  The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations , 1986, Heredity.

[40]  R. Baker,et al.  Speciation by monobrachial centric fusions. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  T. Prout HARDY‐WEINBERG AND FERTILITY SELECTION , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[43]  M. Rizzoni,et al.  REDUCTION OF GENE FLOW DUE TO THE PARTIAL STERILITY OF HETEROZYGOTES FOR A CHROMOSOME MUTATION. I. STUDIES ON A “NEUTRAL” GENE NOT LINKED TO THE CHROMOSOME MUTATION IN A TWO POPULATION MODEL , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  J. Klein,et al.  Genetic variation of wild mouse populations in southern Germany. I. Cytogenetic study. , 1983, Genetical research.

[45]  J. Klein,et al.  Genetic variation of wild mouse populations in southern Germany. II. Serological study. , 1983, Genetical research.

[46]  M. Cristaldi,et al.  Changes of seminiferous epithelium in hybrids of mice carrying Robertsonian karyotype. , 1982, Archives of andrology.

[47]  P. Crosignani,et al.  Genetic Control of Gamete Production and Function , 1982 .

[48]  R. B. Selander,et al.  BIOSYS-1: a FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics , 1981 .

[49]  B. Cattanach,et al.  X-ray induction of translocations in mice carrying metacentrics (Robertsonian fusions); detection of whole arm chromosome exchanges. , 1981, Mutation research.

[50]  M. Nei,et al.  Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. , 1978, Genetics.

[51]  R. Castiglia,et al.  Short Communication. Whole-Arm Reciprocal Translocation (WART) in a Feral Population of Mice , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[52]  J. Auffray,et al.  Spontaneous occurrence of a Robertsonian fusion involving chromosome 19 by single whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) in wild-derived house mice , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[53]  J. Cowell A photographic representation of the variability in the G-banded structure of the chromosomes in the mouse karyotype , 2004, Chromosoma.

[54]  C. Redi,et al.  Trapping speciation , 1997, Nature.

[55]  J. Searle,et al.  Male meiosis and gametogenesis in wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from a chromosomal hybrid zone; a comparison between "simple" Robertsonian heterozygotes and homozygotes. , 1992, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[56]  U. Eichenlaub-Ritter,et al.  Nondisjunction, disturbances in spindle structure, and characteristics of chromosome alignment in maturing oocytes of mice heterozygous for Robertsonian translocations. , 1990, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[57]  H. Winking Some aspects of Robertsonian karyotype variation in European wild mice. , 1986, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[58]  M. J. Harris,et al.  Aneuploidy in the embryonic progeny of females heterozygous for the Robertsonian chromosome (9.12) in genetically wild Peru-Coppock mice (Mus musculus). , 1986, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[59]  G. Nascetti,et al.  Role of contact areas in chromosomal speciation of the European long-tailed house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) , 1985 .

[60]  E. Capanna Robertsonian numerical variation in animal speciation: Mus musculus, an emblematic model. , 1982, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[61]  C. Redi,et al.  Robertsonian karyotype variation in wild house mice from Rhaeto-Lombardia. , 1982, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[62]  A. Gropp Consequences of Robertsonian heterozygosity: segregational impairment of fertility versus male-limited sterility. , 1982 .

[63]  F. Elder,et al.  Yeast stimulation of bone marrow mitosis for cytogenetic investigations. , 1980, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[64]  M. Cristaldi,et al.  Chromosomal Rearrangement, Reproductive Isolation and Speciation in Mammals. The Case of Mus Musculus , 1977 .