Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study

Abstract This qualitative study examines whether virtual projects present challenges that are different from conventional projects and how they might be more useful than face-to-face teams in delivering value in certain contexts. It takes a post-implementation and lessons learned approach to elicit the experiences of two distributed information technology projects within a global banking corporation. Findings indicate that time zone and cultural differences in particular, affected communication and team relations. Other barriers included more ‘conventional’ issues such as management agenda and leadership style, requirements creep, asymmetry in processes and unclear roles and responsibilities. Their presence exacerbated the relational difficulties between team members. However, success in terms of time, budget and value delivery was evident in both of the virtual projects – attributable primarily to the determination and outcome orientation of team members. The study concludes that virtual teams are useful for projects requiring cross-functional or cross-boundary skilled inputs and the key to their value creation is to have a defined strategy to overcome problems associated with at-distance cooperation.

[1]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[2]  John A Scigliano,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed: Deborah L. Duarte and Nancy Tennant Snyder. (2000). 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 256 pages. ISBN: 0-7879-5589-2W01. US$39.95, includes a CD-ROM , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Managing a virtual workplace , 2000 .

[4]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Teams , 2002 .

[5]  C. Saunders,et al.  My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams , 2004 .

[6]  Edward W. Christensen,et al.  Educating a Modern Business Workforce , 2004 .

[7]  Lynne J. Millward,et al.  Effective Virtual Teamwork: A Socio-Cognitive and Motivational Model , 2004 .

[8]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Building Trust in Cross-Cultural Collaborations: Toward a Contingency Perspective: , 2002 .

[9]  Ross Hightower,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics on Information Exchange in Groups , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[11]  Jaclyn Kostner,et al.  Virtual Leadership: Secrets from the Round Table for the Multi-Site Manager , 1996 .

[12]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  G. Vozikis,et al.  Trust in Virtual Teams , 2004 .

[14]  Sully Taylor,et al.  Cross-Cultural Performance Feedback in Multinational Enterprises: Opportunity for Organizational Learning , 2002 .

[15]  A Wilkins,et al.  The virtual workplace. , 1999, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[16]  R. Müller,et al.  Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type , 2007 .

[17]  C. Gibson,et al.  Virtual teams that work : creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness , 2003 .

[18]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[19]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[20]  Michelle LaBrosse,et al.  Managing virtual teams , 2008 .

[21]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[23]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc. , 2002 .

[24]  Sharmila Pixy Ferris,et al.  Virtual and Collaborative Teams , 2003 .

[25]  R. Nagel,et al.  Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer , 1994 .

[26]  Jay Bal,et al.  Implementing virtual teamworking. Part 1: a literature review of best practice , 2000 .

[27]  James David,et al.  Remote Control , 2008 .

[28]  S. Cooper,et al.  Remote Control , 2002, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[29]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[30]  Denise Johnson McManus,et al.  Information Infrastructure Centrality in the Agile Organization , 2002, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[31]  Donald D. Davis The Tao of Leadership in Virtual Teams , 2004 .

[32]  V. Herzog,et al.  2000 International Student Paper Award Winner: Trust Building on Corporate Collaborative Project Teams , 2001 .

[33]  Kimball Fisher,et al.  The Distributed Mind: Achieving High Performance Through the Collective Intelligence of Knowledge Work Teams , 1997 .

[34]  Liz Lee-Kelley,et al.  A social interaction approach to managing the "invisibles" of virtual teams , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[35]  Deborah Britt Roebuck,et al.  Using a Simulation to Explore the Challenges of Communicating in a Virtual Team , 2004 .

[36]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  REMOTE CONTROL: PREDICTORS OF ELECTRONIC MONITORING INTENSITY AND SECRECY , 2004 .

[37]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[39]  Ook Lee,et al.  Cultural Differences in E-Mail Use of Virtual Teams: A Critical Social Theory Perspective , 2002, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[40]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  On the theory of virtual organization , 1997 .

[42]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  E-Leadership and Virtual Teams , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.