Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals

Regional and global assessments periodically update what we know, and highlight what remains to be known, about the linkages between people and nature that both define and depend upon the state of the environment. To guide research that better informs policy and practice, we systematically synthesize knowledge gaps from recent assessments of four regions of the globe and three key themes by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. We assess their relevance to global sustainability goals and trace their evolution relative to those identified in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. We found that global sustainability goals cannot be achieved without improved knowledge on feedbacks between social and ecological systems, effectiveness of governance systems and the influence of institutions on the social distribution of ecosystem services. These top research priorities have persisted for the 14 years since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Our analysis also reveals limited understanding of the role of indigenous and local knowledge in sustaining nature’s benefits to people. Our findings contribute to a policy-relevant and solution-oriented agenda for global, long-term social-ecological research.Based on assessments of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, key research priorities are identified and contrasted with the SDGs and the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.

[1]  R. C. Macridis A review , 1963 .

[2]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Closing global knowledge gaps: Producing generalized knowledge from case studies of social-ecological systems , 2018 .

[3]  Anne Larigauderie,et al.  A Rosetta Stone for Nature’s Benefits to People , 2015, PLoS biology.

[4]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS): Knowledge for Sustainable Stewardship of Social-ecological Systems Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society: Knowledge for sustainable stewardship of social-ecological systems , 2017 .

[5]  C. Walters,et al.  Surprise and opportunity for learning in Grand Canyon: the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program , 2013 .

[6]  Hilary Bradbury,et al.  Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[7]  J. Fischer,et al.  A leverage points perspective on sustainability , 2019, People and Nature.

[8]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Research Needs , 2006, Science.

[9]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[10]  Maes Joachim,et al.  Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services , 2013 .

[11]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Whose conservation? , 2014, Science.

[12]  Sana Okayasu,et al.  IPBES/6/INF/5: The regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Asia and the Pacific of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2018 .

[13]  N. Droste,et al.  Where communities intermingle, diversity grows – The evolution of topics in ecosystem service research , 2018, PloS one.

[14]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. Daw,et al.  Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being , 2011, Environmental Conservation.

[16]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  A novel telecoupling framework to assess social relations across spatial scales for ecosystem services research. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  Joseph Alcamo,et al.  Evaluating the impacts of global environmental assessments , 2017 .

[18]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[20]  I. Lorge Research Needs , 1950 .

[21]  Russell Gorddard,et al.  Values, rules and knowledge: Adaptation as change in the decision context , 2016 .

[22]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services , 2006 .

[23]  C. Folke,et al.  Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience , 1998 .

[24]  Stefan B. Williams,et al.  BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene , 2018, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[25]  S. Polasky,et al.  Assessing nature's contributions to people , 2018, Science.

[26]  Li Zhang,et al.  Earth observation big data for climate change research , 2015 .

[27]  E. Turnhout,et al.  Participation and inclusiveness in the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[28]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[29]  E. Archer,et al.  The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa , 2018 .

[30]  M. F. Parry,et al.  A Retrospective Analysis , 1990 .

[31]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach , 2017 .

[32]  J. Gonzalez,et al.  Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services , 2016 .

[34]  T. Dedeurwaerdere,et al.  A Pragmatist Approach to Transdisciplinarity in Sustainability Research: From Complex Systems Theory to Reflexive Science , 2015 .

[35]  Pushpam Kumar,et al.  The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity : mainstreaming the economics of nature : a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB , 2010 .

[36]  Dirk J. Roux,et al.  Nurturing communities of practice for transdisciplinary research , 2015 .

[37]  D. Simberloff,et al.  The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people , 2015 .

[39]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[40]  C. Flachsland,et al.  40 years of global environmental assessments: A retrospective analysis , 2017 .

[41]  Maria Tengö,et al.  Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach , 2014, AMBIO.

[42]  A. Frid,et al.  Incorporate Indigenous perspectives for impactful research and effective management , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[43]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Ecosystem services and nature’s contribution to people: negotiating diverse values and trade-offs in land systems , 2019, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[44]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability , 2015 .

[45]  M. C. Diaw,et al.  Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2018 .

[46]  María Florencia Méndez,et al.  People and ecosystems : the fraying web of life. Chapter 1, Linking people and ecosystems , 2014 .

[47]  S. Pickett,et al.  From transdisciplinary projects to platforms: expanding capacity and impact of land systems knowledge and decision making , 2019, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[48]  Carl Folke,et al.  Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability , 2017 .

[49]  Janne S. Kotiaho,et al.  The IPBES assessment report on land degradation and restoration , 2018 .

[50]  P. Laterra,et al.  From biophysical to social-ecological trade-offs: integrating biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in the Argentine Dry Chaco , 2015 .

[51]  P. Harrison,et al.  Nature’s contributions to people in mountains: A review , 2019, PloS one.

[52]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation , 2013 .

[53]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Key features for more successful place-based sustainability research on social-ecological systems: a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) perspective , 2017 .