Pareto boundary: a useful tool in the accuracy assessment of low spatial resolution thematic products
暂无分享,去创建一个
Pietro Alessandro Brivio | Luigi Boschetti | Stéphane P. Flasse | S. Flasse | L. Boschetti | P. Brivio
[1] Ralph L. Keeney,et al. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .
[2] R. L. Keeney,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[3] R. G. Oderwald,et al. Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. , 1983 .
[4] Stephen V. Stehman,et al. Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy , 1997 .
[5] D. Roy,et al. Burned area mapping using multi-temporal moderate spatial resolution data—a bi-directional reflectance model-based expectation approach , 2002 .
[6] Giles M. Foody,et al. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .
[7] J. Pereira,et al. Vegetation burning in the year 2000: Global burned area estimates from SPOT VEGETATION data , 2004 .
[8] S. Flasse,et al. Analysis of the conflict between omission and commission in low spatial resolution dichotomic thematic products: The Pareto Boundary , 2004 .
[9] S. Plummer,et al. Burnt area detection at global scale using ATSR‐2: The GLOBSCAR products and their qualification , 2004 .