Mesoporous silica nanoparticle nanocarriers: biofunctionality and biocompatibility.

The study of ordered mesoporous silica materials has exploded since their discovery by Mobil researchers 20 years ago. The ability to make uniformly sized, porous, and dispersible nanoparticles using colloidal chemistry and evaporation-induced self-assembly has led to many applications of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNPs) as "nanocarriers" for delivery of drugs and other cargos to cells. The exceptionally high surface area of MSNPs, often exceeding 1000 m²/g, and the ability to independently modify pore size and surface chemistry, enables the loading of diverse cargos and cargo combinations at levels exceeding those of other common drug delivery carriers such as liposomes or polymer conjugates. This is because noncovalent electrostatic, hydrogen-bonding, and van der Waals interactions of the cargo with the MSNP internal surface cause preferential adsorption of cargo to the MSNP, allowing loading capacities to surpass the solubility limit of a solution or that achievable by osmotic gradient loading. The ability to independently modify the MSNP surface and interior makes possible engineered biofunctionality and biocompatibility. In this Account, we detail our recent efforts to develop MSNPs as biocompatible nanocarriers (Figure 1 ) that simultaneously display multiple functions including (1) high visibility/contrast in multiple imaging modalities, (2) dispersibility, (3) binding specificity to a particular target tissue or cell type, (4) ability to load and deliver large concentrations of diverse cargos, and (5) triggered or controlled release of cargo. Toward function 1, we chemically conjugated fluorescent dyes or incorporated magnetic nanoparticles to enable in vivo optical or magnetic resonance imaging. For function 2, we have made MSNPs with polymer coatings, charged groups, or supported lipid bilayers, which decrease aggregation and improve stability in saline solutions. For functions 3 and 4, we have enhanced passive bioaccumulation via the enhanced permeability and retention effect by modifying the MSNP surfaces with positively charged polymers. We have also chemically attached ligands to MSNPs that selectively bind to receptors overexpressed in cancer cells. We have used encapsulation of MSNPs within reconfigurable supported lipid bilayers to develop new classes of responsive nanocarriers that actively interact with the target cell. Toward function 4, we exploit the high surface area and tailorable surface chemistry of MSNPs to retain hydrophobic drugs. Finally, for function 5, we have engineered dynamic behaviors by incorporating molecular machines within or at the entrances of MSNP pores and by using ligands, polymers, or lipid bilayers. These provide a means to seal-in and retain cargo and to direct MSNP interactions with and internalization by target cells. Application of MSNPs as nanocarriers requires biocompatibility and low toxicity. Here the intrinsic porosity of the MSNP surface reduces the extent of hydrogen bonding or electrostatic interactions with cell membranes as does surface coating with polymers or lipid bilayers. Furthermore, the high surface area and low extent of condensation of the MSNP siloxane framework promote a high rate of dissolution into soluble silicic acid species, which are found to be nontoxic. Potential toxicity is further mitigated by the high drug capacity of MSNPs, which greatly reduces needed dosages compared with other nanocarriers. We anticipate that future generations of MSNPs incorporating molecular machines and encapsulated by membrane-like lipid bilayers will achieve a new level of controlled cellular interactions.

[1]  Tian Xia,et al.  Processing pathway dependence of amorphous silica nanoparticle toxicity: colloidal vs pyrolytic. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Zongxi Li,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in biomedical applications. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[3]  Jason L. Townson,et al.  Delivery of small interfering RNA by peptide-targeted mesoporous silica nanoparticle-supported lipid bilayers. , 2012, ACS nano.

[4]  Roberto Cingolani,et al.  SiO2 nanoparticles biocompatibility and their potential for gene delivery and silencing. , 2012, Nanoscale.

[5]  J. Zink,et al.  Measurement of Uptake and Release Capacities of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Enabled by Nanovalve Gates. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces.

[6]  Courtney R. Thomas,et al.  Synthesis of biomolecule-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted hydrophobic drug delivery to cancer cells. , 2011, Small.

[7]  Ronnie H. Fang,et al.  Erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged polymeric nanoparticles as a biomimetic delivery platform , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Courtney R. Thomas,et al.  Mechanized silica nanoparticles: a new frontier in theranostic nanomedicine. , 2011, Accounts of chemical research.

[9]  Hamidreza Ghandehari,et al.  Impact of silica nanoparticle design on cellular toxicity and hemolytic activity. , 2011, ACS nano.

[10]  Mark B. Carter,et al.  Erratum: The targeted delivery of multicomponent cargos to cancer cells by nanoporous particle-supported lipid bilayers (Nature Materials (2011) 10 (389-397)) , 2011 .

[11]  Zongxi Li,et al.  Aspect ratio determines the quantity of mesoporous silica nanoparticle uptake by a small GTPase-dependent macropinocytosis mechanism. , 2011, ACS nano.

[12]  Tian Xia,et al.  Use of size and a copolymer design feature to improve the biodistribution and the enhanced permeability and retention effect of doxorubicin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles in a murine xenograft tumor model. , 2011, ACS nano.

[13]  J. F. Stoddart,et al.  Autonomous in vitro anticancer drug release from mesoporous silica nanoparticles by pH-sensitive nanovalves. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  J. Fraser Stoddart,et al.  Noninvasive remote-controlled release of drug molecules in vitro using magnetic actuation of mechanized nanoparticles. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  Zongxi Li,et al.  Engineered design of mesoporous silica nanoparticles to deliver doxorubicin and P-glycoprotein siRNA to overcome drug resistance in a cancer cell line. , 2010, ACS nano.

[16]  Mara Ghiazza,et al.  Does vitreous silica contradict the toxicity of the crystalline silica paradigm? , 2010, Chemical research in toxicology.

[17]  Christy L Haynes,et al.  Impacts of mesoporous silica nanoparticle size, pore ordering, and pore integrity on hemolytic activity. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Jeffrey I. Zink,et al.  Multifunctional inorganic nanoparticles for imaging, targeting, and drug delivery , 2010, BiOS.

[19]  Saji George,et al.  Polyethyleneimine coating enhances the cellular uptake of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and allows safe delivery of siRNA and DNA constructs. , 2009, ACS nano.

[20]  Ying-Wei Yang,et al.  Dual-controlled nanoparticles exhibiting AND logic. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  T. Xia,et al.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. , 2009, Nature materials.

[22]  何前军 Intracellular Localization and Cytotoxicity of Spherical Mesoporous Silica Nano- and Microparticles , 2009 .

[23]  C. Jeffrey Brinker,et al.  Porous nanoparticle supported lipid bilayers (protocells) as delivery vehicles. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  Taeghwan Hyeon,et al.  Multifunctional uniform nanoparticles composed of a magnetite nanocrystal core and a mesoporous silica shell for magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging and for drug delivery. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[25]  Robert Langer,et al.  The biocompatibility of mesoporous silicates. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[26]  Chung-Yuan Mou,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a delivery system of gadolinium for effective human stem cell tracking. , 2008, Small.

[27]  Monty Liong,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a delivery system for hydrophobic anticancer drugs. , 2007, Small.

[28]  Hung-Ting Chen,et al.  Synthesis and functionalization of a mesoporous silica nanoparticle based on the sol-gel process and applications in controlled release. , 2007, Accounts of chemical research.

[29]  W. Rom,et al.  Basic pathogenetic mechanisms in silicosis: current understanding , 2005, Current opinion in pulmonary medicine.

[30]  Seong Huh,et al.  Organic Functionalization and Morphology Control of Mesoporous Silicas via a Co-Condensation Synthesis Method , 2003 .

[31]  Theresa M Allen,et al.  Internalizing antibodies are necessary for improved therapeutic efficacy of antibody-targeted liposomal drugs. , 2002, Cancer research.

[32]  M. Vallet‐Regí,et al.  A New Property of MCM-41: Drug Delivery System , 2001 .

[33]  B. Fubini,et al.  Cytotoxic and transforming effects of silica particles with different surface properties in Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells. , 2000, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[34]  V. Castranova,et al.  Silicosis and coal workers' pneumoconiosis. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[35]  J. Zink,et al.  In Situ Luminescence Probing of the Chemical and Structural Changes during Formation of Dip-Coated Lamellar Phase Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Sol−Gel Thin Films , 2000 .

[36]  Yunfeng Lu,et al.  Rapid prototyping of patterned functional nanostructures , 2000, Nature.

[37]  Yunfeng Lu,et al.  Evaporation-Induced Self-Assembly: Nanostructures Made Easy** , 1999 .

[38]  Yunfeng Lu,et al.  Aerosol-assisted self-assembly of mesostructured spherical nanoparticles , 1999, Nature.

[39]  P. Borm,et al.  The quartz hazard: a variable entity. , 1998, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[40]  Bruce Dunn,et al.  Continuous formation of supported cubic and hexagonal mesoporous films by sol–gel dip-coating , 1997, Nature.

[41]  Kenneth M. Kemner,et al.  Functionalized Monolayers on Ordered Mesoporous Supports , 1997 .

[42]  K. Unger,et al.  The synthesis of micrometer‐ and submicrometer‐size spheres of ordered mesoporous oxide MCM‐41 , 1997 .

[43]  J. B. Higgins,et al.  A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates , 1992 .

[44]  J. S. Beck,et al.  Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism , 1992, Nature.

[45]  C. Brinker,et al.  NMR confirmation of strained “defects” in amorphous silica , 1988 .

[46]  C. Brinker,et al.  ESR studies of irradiated 17O-enriched sol-gel silicas: Organic impurity effects and the structure of the nonbridging-oxygen hole center , 1987 .

[47]  L. T. Zhuravlev Concentration of hydroxyl groups on the surface of amorphous silicas , 1987 .

[48]  A. Allison,et al.  Physico-Chemical Properties of Silica in Relation to its Toxicity , 1966, Nature.

[49]  Juan L. Vivero-Escoto,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for reducing hemolytic activity towards mammalian red blood cells. , 2009, Small.

[50]  M. Schoonen,et al.  Mineral-Induced Formation of Reactive Oxygen Species , 2006 .

[51]  M. Gottesman,et al.  Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP–dependent transporters , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[52]  B. Fubini,et al.  Variability of biological responses to silicas: effect of origin, crystallinity, and state of surface on generation of reactive oxygen species and morphological transformation of mammalian cells. , 2001, Journal of environmental pathology, toxicology and oncology : official organ of the International Society for Environmental Toxicology and Cancer.

[53]  P. Borm,et al.  The quartz hazard: effects of surface and matrix on inflammogenic activity. , 2001, Journal of environmental pathology, toxicology and oncology : official organ of the International Society for Environmental Toxicology and Cancer.