Multiple public spheres of Weibo: a typology of forms and potentials of online public spheres in China†

The advent of online media, and particularly social media, has led to scholarly debates about their implications. Authoritarian countries are interesting in this respect because social media might facilitate open and critical debates that are not possible in traditional media. China is arguably the most relevant and interesting case in this respect, because it limits the influx of non-domestic social media communication, has established its own microcosm of social media and tries to closely monitor and control it and censor problematic content. While such censorship is very effective in some instances, however, it fails to shut down all open debates completely. We analyse the pre-eminent Chinese social media platform – Sina Weibo – and present a typology of different kinds of public spheres that exist on this platform in which open and critical debates can occur under specific circumstances: Thematic public spheres include phenomena of common concern, such as environmental pollution or food safety; short-term public spheres emerge after unexpected events; encoded public spheres are deliberate attempts of users to circumvent censorship; local public spheres focus on sub-national phenomena and problems; non-domestic political public spheres exist on political topics from other countries but are often referenced back to China; mobile public spheres exist because many people use Weibo on their smartphones and also have access to deleted content there and meta public spheres are debates about censorship itself.

[1]  Jonathan Sullivan,et al.  A tale of two microblogs in China , 2012 .

[2]  Mike S. Schäfer,et al.  Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany , 2010, New Media Soc..

[3]  Jason P. Abbott Democracy@internet.org Revisited: analysing the socio-political impact of the internet and new social media in East Asia , 2012 .

[4]  Assafa Endeshaw,et al.  Internet regulation in China: the never‐ending cat and mouse game1 , 2004 .

[5]  Cherian George The Net Delusion: How not to liberate the world , 2013 .

[6]  Jennifer Holdaway Environment and Health Research in China: The State of the Field* , 2013, The China Quarterly.

[7]  Peter Dahlgren,et al.  The Internet and the Democratization of Civic Culture , 2000 .

[8]  Dan S. Wallach,et al.  The Velocity of Censorship: High-Fidelity Detection of Microblog Post Deletions , 2013, USENIX Security Symposium.

[9]  Franci Pivec,et al.  Measuring the information society , 2003 .

[10]  Lincoln Dahlberg The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[11]  William T. Rowe,et al.  Review Article : The Public Sphere in Modern China , 1990 .

[12]  L. Tang,et al.  The interaction between mass media and the internet in non-democratic states: The case of China , 2012 .

[13]  Jingfang Liu Picturing a green virtual public space for social change: a study of Internet activism and Web-based environmental collective actions in China , 2011 .

[14]  Yongnian Zheng,et al.  Information Technology, Public Space, and Collective Action in China , 2005 .

[15]  E. Segev,et al.  Social Media and the Arab Spring , 2013 .

[16]  Ruud Koopmans,et al.  Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Right‐Wing Violence in Germany1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  K. Fu,et al.  Reality Check for the Chinese Microblog Space: A Random Sampling Approach , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Nicholas Garnham,et al.  Habermas and the public sphere , 2007 .

[19]  M. Schäfers,et al.  Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft , 1988 .

[20]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  Censorship and deletion practices in Chinese social media , 2012, First Monday.

[21]  Margaret E. Roberts,et al.  How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression , 2013, American Political Science Review.

[22]  Jürgen Gerhards,et al.  Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies , 2002 .

[23]  C. Calhoun,et al.  Media, Civil Society, and the Rise of a Green Public Sphere in China , 2007 .

[24]  Hartmut Wessler Investigating Deliberativeness Comparatively , 2008 .

[25]  Gianpietro Mazzoleni,et al.  The international encyclopedia of political communication , 2016 .

[26]  Min Jiang,et al.  Spaces of Authoritarian Deliberation: Online Public Deliberation in China , 2010 .

[27]  Michael Schaich,et al.  The Public Sphere , 2009 .

[28]  S Canaves,et al.  China's social networking problem , 2011, IEEE Spectrum.

[29]  Michael Chau,et al.  Assessing Censorship on Microblogs in China: Discriminatory Keyword Analysis and the Real-Name Registration Policy , 2013, IEEE Internet Computing.

[30]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[31]  Nele Noesselt,et al.  Microblogs and the Adaptation of the Chinese Party-State's Governance Strategy , 2014 .

[32]  Saba Bebawi,et al.  The Digital Public Sphere , 2017 .

[33]  Zizi Papacharissi The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[34]  Guobin Yang,et al.  The Internet and the Rise of a Transnational Chinese Cultural Sphere , 2003 .

[35]  Guobin Yang Brokering Environment and Health in China: issue entrepreneurs of the public sphere , 2010 .

[36]  Baogang He,et al.  Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development , 2011, Perspectives on Politics.

[37]  Peter Dahlgren The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[38]  Xiao Qiang,et al.  Liberation Technology: The Battle for the Chinese Internet , 2011 .

[39]  Christo Wilson,et al.  Tweeting under pressure: analyzing trending topics and evolving word choice on sina weibo , 2013, COSN '13.

[40]  Jonathan Sullivan,et al.  China’s Weibo: Is faster different? , 2014, New Media Soc..

[41]  Hamadoun I. Touré,et al.  Measuring the Information Society 2013 , 2013 .