Success Traps, Dynamic Capabilities and Firm Performance

Dynamic capabilities (DCs) are fundamental to the understanding of differential firm performance. However, the question remains why some firms are better at developing and applying DCs than others. In particular, successful firms have been warned against the tendency to fall into a success or competence trap, where success reinforces exploitation of existing competences and crowds out exploration of new competences, hindering the development of DCs. Therefore, this study examines the effects of success traps on DCs and consequently firm performance, taking into account firm strategy and market dynamism. To facilitate this, our study also identifies the commonalities of DCs across firms. Drawing on survey data from 113 UK high-tech small and medium-sized firms, we find that success traps have a significant, strong negative effect on DCs, which in turn have a weak positive effect on firm performance; DCs are manifested through absorptive and transformative capabilities as two common features across firms. We also find that the development and application of DCs is related to internal factors (such as success traps) rather than external factors (such as market dynamism).

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[2]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? , 1989 .

[3]  Christoph Zott,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND THE EMERGENCE OF INTRAINDUSTRY DIFFERENTIAL FIRM PERFORMANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A SIMULATION STUDY , 2003 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Organizational Capabilities in Complex Worlds , 2001 .

[5]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[6]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[7]  Bing-Sheng Teng,et al.  Trade-offs in managing resources and capabilities , 2002 .

[8]  Eric Van den Steen,et al.  Managing Know-How , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Oliver Schilke.  On the Contingent Value of Dynamic Capabilities for Competitive Advantage: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Environmental Dynamism , 2014 .

[10]  D. Hambrick.  On the staying power of defenders, analyzers, and prospectors , 2003 .

[11]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER, REALLY? , 1997 .

[12]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[13]  Hans Baumgartner,et al.  Multi-Group Latent Variable Models for Varying Numbers of Items and Factors with Cross-National and Longitudinal Applications , 1998 .

[14]  Richard Makadok.  Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[15]  Y. Caloghirou,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and their indirect impact on firm performance , 2012 .

[16]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[17]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance , 2003 .

[18]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[20]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[21]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Strategic Adaptability and Firm Performance: A Market-Contingent Perspective , 1989 .

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[23]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis , 2004 .

[24]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[25]  George S. Day,et al.  Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority , 1988 .

[26]  Arun Rai,et al.  Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  THE IMPACT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON SUPPLY CHAIN CAPABILITIES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2006 .

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[29]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[30]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[31]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[32]  Krsto Pandza,et al.  Absorptive and transformative capacities in nanotechnology innovation systems , 2007 .

[33]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[34]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[35]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[36]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[37]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  What are Dynamic Capabilities and are They a Useful Construct in Strategic Management? , 2009 .

[38]  B. Byrne.  Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using AMOS Graphics: A Road Less Traveled , 2004 .

[39]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[40]  D. Hambrick.  Environmental scanning and organizational strategy , 1982 .

[41]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[42]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER , REALLY ? , 1997 .

[43]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-in , 2002 .

[44]  R. Morgan,et al.  Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth , 2007 .

[45]  G. Pisano.  Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[46]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[47]  B. Zirger,et al.  The new product learning cycle , 1985 .

[48]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[49]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Continuous “Morphing”: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function , 2001 .

[50]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[51]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[53]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance , 1988 .

[54]  Yiannis E. Spanos,et al.  An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective , 2001 .

[55]  K. Weick.  Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. , 1984 .

[56]  I. Barreto.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future , 2010 .

[57]  George G. Panigyrakis,et al.  Market orientation and performance: An empirical investigation in the retail industry in Greece , 2007 .

[58]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Paradox of Success: An Archival and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental Change , 2000 .

[59]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration , 1992 .

[60]  Oscar F. Bustinza,et al.  Explaining the Causes and Effects of Dynamic Capabilities Generation: A Multiple‐Indicator Multiple‐Cause Modelling Approach , 2013 .

[61]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[62]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[63]  ZolloMaurizio,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[64]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[65]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[66]  Rodney C. Runyan,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation versus Small Business Orientation: What Are Their Relationships to Firm Performance? , 2008 .

[67]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[68]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploration of How Firms Renew Their Resource Base , 2009 .

[69]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement , 1982 .

[70]  Kwon Yung-Chul,et al.  Learning Orientation, Dynamic Capabilities and Performance in Korean High-Tech Ventures , 2013 .

[71]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[72]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[73]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[74]  O. Williamson,et al.  STRATEGY RESEARCH: GOVERNANCE AND COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[75]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The Impact of Dynamic Capabilities on Resource Access and Development , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[76]  S. Zahra,et al.  A Capabilities Perspective on the Effects of Early Internationalization on Firm Survival and Growth , 2006 .

[77]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[78]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. , 1980 .

[79]  Paul E. Spector.  Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? , 1987 .

[80]  Kent D. Miller,et al.  Variable Organizational Risk Preferences: Tests of the March-Shapira Model , 2004 .

[81]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Unbundling Dynamic Capabilities: an Exploratory Study of Continuous Product Innovation , 2003 .

[82]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  The Effect of 'Simplicity' on the Strategy-Performance Relationship: A Note , 2006 .

[83]  Ari Jantunen,et al.  THE ROLE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES IN DEVELOPING INNOVATION-RELATED CAPABILITIES , 2011 .

[84]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Capabilities in Motion: New Organizational Forms and the Reshaping of the Hollywood Movie Industry , 2003 .

[85]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[86]  Kelly E. See,et al.  The Paradox of Stretch Goals: Organizations in Pursuit of the Seemingly Impossible , 2010 .

[87]  Hanna-Kaisa Ellonen,et al.  Beyond appearances – Do dynamic capabilities of innovative firms actually differ? , 2012 .

[88]  Dave Crick,et al.  The internationalisation of 'high performing' UK high-tech SMEs: a study of planned and unplanned strategies , 2005 .

[89]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[90]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Strategy‐making and environment: The third link , 1983 .

[91]  Michael H. Morris,et al.  The Dilemma of Growth: Understanding Venture Size Choices of Women Entrepreneurs , 2006 .

[92]  Thomas H. Brush,et al.  The relative influence of industry and corporation on business segment performance: an alternative estimate , 1999 .

[93]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities , 2001 .

[94]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[95]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[96]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[97]  Antonio J. Verdú-Jover,et al.  The Effects of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Performance through Knowledge and Innovation , 2008 .

[98]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[99]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..