Assessment of a percutaneous iliosacral screw insertion simulator

BACKGROUND Navigational simulator use for specialized training purposes is rather uncommon in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. However, it reveals providing a valuable tool to train orthopaedic surgeons and help them to plan complex surgical procedures. PURPOSE This work's objective was to assess educational efficiency of a path simulator under fluoroscopic guidance applied to sacroiliac joint percutaneous screw fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated 23 surgeons' accuracy inserting a guide-wire in a human cadaver experiment, following a pre-established procedure. These medical trainees were defined in three prospective respects: novice or skilled; with or without theoretical knowledge; with or without surgical procedure familiarity. The screw insertion in the human cadaver was performed in two different settings: either without prior training for a first group (G1) or after simulator guidance in the second group (G2). Analysed criteria for each tested surgeon included the number of intraoperative X-rays taken in order to achieve the surgical procedure as well as an iatrogenic index reflecting the surgeon's ability to detect any hazardous trajectory at the time of performing said procedure. RESULTS An average number of 13 X-rays was required for wire implantation by the G1 group. G2 group, assisted by the simulator use, required an average of 10 X-rays. A substantial difference was especially observed within the novice sub-group (N), with an average of 12.75 X-rays for the G1 category and an average of 8.5 X-rays for the G2 category. In the second sub-group of operators devoid of procedural knowledge (P-), a significant difference was found, since 12 X-rays appeared on average required in the G1 group versus six in the G2 group. Finally, within the sub-group of operators with technical knowledge (T+), a significant difference also was found since an average of 16 X-rays was required in the G1 versus an average 10.8 X-rays in the G2 group. As far as the iatrogenic index is concerned, we were unable to observe any significant difference between the groups. DISCUSSION Despite some methodological variations, we were able to demonstrate the simulator's efficiency in familiarizing the operator with the use of a 2D imaging system as a first step facilitating the procedure conduct in the real 3D patient environment. Novice surgeons (N) having a good lumbosacral joint anatomy knowledge although devoid of specific surgical technique knowledge were the ones who most benefited from this guiding tool. Analysis of the training data collected during simulator's use helps orientating the prospective surgeon toward possession of not yet acquired learning points. This educational program can easily be extended to any other percutaneous technique requiring fluoroscopic control guidance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III prospective diagnostic study.

[1]  C Sutton,et al.  Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface. , 1999, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[2]  R Poss,et al.  Development of a virtual reality arthroscopic knee simulator. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  J. Michelson,et al.  Simulation in orthopaedic education: an overview of theory and practice. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  Raphael P. Rush,et al.  Beyond the Operating Room: A Simulator for Sacroiliac Screw Insertion , 2008, Surgical innovation.

[5]  Lionel Carrat,et al.  Percutaneous Iliosacral Screw Placement Using Image Guided Techniques , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  Fred H. Geisler,et al.  Anterior screw stabilization of displaced odontoid fractures with concomitant fracture of the posterior arch of C1 , 1989 .

[7]  F. Mann,et al.  Radiographic recognition of the sacral alar slope for optimal placement of iliosacral screws: a cadaveric and clinical study. , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[8]  Daniel Schweitzer,et al.  Closed reduction and iliosacral percutaneous fixation of unstable pelvic ring fractures. , 2008, Injury.

[9]  J. Matta,et al.  Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Lucile Vadcard,et al.  Architecture d'un environnement d'aide à l'apprentissage de la chirurgie orthopédique , 2004 .

[11]  J P Waddell,et al.  Pelvic disruption: assessment and classification. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  Implantation des vis ilio-sacrées , 2008 .

[13]  J. Tonetti,et al.  Lésions neurologiques des fractures de l’anneau pelvien , 2004 .

[14]  Philip J. Kregor,et al.  Early Results of Percutaneous Iliosacral Screws Placed with the Patient in the Supine Position , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[15]  E. Kotter,et al.  Computer-navigated Iliosacral Screw Insertion Reduces Malposition Rate and Radiation Exposure , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  D. Templeman,et al.  Proximity of iliosacral screws to neurovascular structures after internal fixation. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  I A Anderson,et al.  Virtual reality assessment of technical skill using the Bonedoc DHS simulator. , 2008, Injury.

[18]  W. J. Hamilton,et al.  Early stages of human development. , 1949, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.