When Less Can Be More: Dual Task Effects on Speech Fluency

Minimizing cognitive resources while executing wellpracticed motor tasks has been shown to increase automaticity and enhance performance (e.g., Beilock, Carr, Macmahon, & Starkes, 2002). Based on this principle, we examined whether more fluent speech production could be induced through a dual task paradigm that engaged working memory (WM) while speech was produced. We also considered whether effects varied for speakers who differed in their habitual degree of attentional control during speech production. Twenty fluent adults and 19 adults who stutter performed (1) a baseline speaking task, (2) a baseline WM task with manipulations of domain, load, and inter-stimulus interval (ISI), and (3) a series of dual tasks in which the speaking task was combined with each unique set of WM conditions. Results indicated a fluency benefit under dual task conditions, which was specific to atypical forms of disfluency but comparable across speaker types and manipulations of the WM task. Findings suggest that WM is associated with atypical forms of disfluency and that suppressing these resources enhances speech fluency, although further research is needed to specify the cognitive mechanism involved in this effect and clarify the nature of this association.

[1]  D. Allport,et al.  On the Division of Attention: A Disproof of the Single Channel Hypothesis , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Rob Gray,et al.  From attentional control to attentional spillover: a skill-level investigation of attention, movement, and performance outcomes. , 2012, Human movement science.

[3]  Robert Gray,et al.  Why do athletes choke under pressure , 2012 .

[4]  E. Yairi,et al.  Normative disfluency data for early childhood stuttering. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Analysis of stuttering using CHILDES and CLAN , 1996 .

[6]  C. Shea,et al.  Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning , 2003, Psychological research.

[7]  Sabrina M. Tom,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Masters,et al.  Benefits of an external focus of attention: Common coding or conscious processing? , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  M. Leclercq Theoretical aspects of the main components and functions of attention , 2004 .

[10]  R. Masters Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure , 1992 .

[11]  C. L. M. The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[12]  L. D. De Nil,et al.  Speech sequence skill learning in adults who stutter. , 2011, Journal of fluency disorders.

[13]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: Evidence for domain-specific working memory systems , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[15]  V. Gracco,et al.  Verbal Implicit Sequence Learning in Persons Who Stutter and Persons With Parkinson's Disease , 2013, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  R. Baumeister Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Boaz M. Ben-David,et al.  The impact of threat and cognitive stress on speech motor control in people who stutter. , 2014, Journal of fluency disorders.

[18]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  A matched filter hypothesis for cognitive control , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Processing and Storage in Working Memory Span , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  R. Gray Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: expertise differences, choking, and slumps. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  Isolation of a Central Bottleneck of Information Processing with Time-Resolved fMRI , 2006, Neuron.

[22]  A. Giraud,et al.  Severity of dysfluency correlates with basal ganglia activity in persistent developmental stuttering , 2008, Brain and Language.

[23]  J. Hardin,et al.  Generalized Linear Models and Extensions , 2001 .

[24]  L. D. De Nil,et al.  Speech skill learning of persons who stutter and fluent speakers under single and dual task conditions , 2009, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[25]  Lesa Hoffman,et al.  Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: Foundations and illustrative examples , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[26]  Benjamin O. Turner,et al.  Cortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  B. Peterson,et al.  A Functional Imaging Study of Self-Regulatory Capacities in Persons Who Stutter , 2014, PloS one.

[28]  J. Scott Yaruss,et al.  Real-Time Analysis of Speech Fluency , 1998 .

[29]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  An automated version of the operation span task , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[30]  Raymond J. Shaw,et al.  Effects of adult age on structural and operational capacities in working memory. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[31]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Anxiety-Induced Changes in Movement Behaviour during the Execution of a Complex whole-body task , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  F. Wijnen,et al.  Stuttering as a monitoring deficit : Abstract , 2005 .

[33]  C. Nang,et al.  Speeded verbal responding in adults who stutter: are there deficits in linguistic encoding? , 2008, Journal of fluency disorders.

[34]  L. D. De Nil,et al.  Early-stage chunking of finger tapping sequences by persons who stutter and fluent speakers , 2013, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[35]  R. Compton,et al.  Preverbal error-monitoring in stutterers and fluent speakers , 2011, Brain and Language.

[36]  J. M. Shine,et al.  Delegation to automaticity: the driving force for cognitive evolution? , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[37]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Monitoring-induced disruption in skilled typewriting. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  H. Teulings,et al.  Differential levels of speech and manual dysfluency in adults who stutter during simultaneous drawing and speaking tasks. , 2009, Human movement science.

[39]  H. Pashler Attentional Limitations in Doing Two Tasks at the Same Time , 1992 .