Risk functions oriented autonomous overtaking

This paper presents control formulations which integrate safety indicators as time headway and time to collision in the context of autonomous overtaking. Simulations via a traffic scenario in the high fidelity vehicle simulator IPG CarMaker are used to confirm the validity of the method. Some simple considerations allow to highlight the differences, in particular the time headway formulation is better suitable to guarantee safety in the case of very strong unexpected deceleration of preceding vehicles, while the time to collision approach precedes to similar safety for normal up to high deceleration of the other traffic participants, while offering much better comfort and fuel efficiency. Time headway precedes also to larger inter-vehicle distances, which represent a possible drawback in terms of capacity of the roads but may also make the approach useless in practice, as other drivers may enter into this space and thus remove the advantages of the time headway approach. As a conclusion, a combination of both approaches is suggested.

[1]  Katja Vogel,et al.  A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Luigi del Re,et al.  Efficient mixed integer programming for autonomous overtaking , 2017, 2017 American Control Conference (ACC).

[3]  Chengqiu Xie Traffic and Transport Psychology , 2002 .

[4]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Robot motion planning , 1970, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.

[5]  Hossein Pishro-Nik,et al.  Introduction to Probability, Statistics, and Random Processes , 2014 .

[6]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[7]  A Heino,et al.  Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[8]  Jonas Sjöberg,et al.  Predictive cruise control with autonomous overtaking , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[9]  Harald Waschl,et al.  Cooperative adaptive cruise control applying stochastic linear model predictive control strategies , 2015, 2015 European Control Conference (ECC).

[10]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Traffic Safety and the Driver , 1991 .

[11]  Wayne L. Winston,et al.  Introduction to mathematical programming , 1991 .

[12]  Andreas Kugi,et al.  Optimisation based path planning for car parking in narrow environments , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[13]  Ionela Prodan,et al.  Hyperplane arrangements in mixed-integer programming techniques. Collision avoidance application with zonotopic sets , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[14]  Luigi del Re,et al.  A risk constrained control approach for adaptive cruise control , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA).

[15]  J. A. Rothengatter,et al.  Traffic and Transport Psychology , 1997 .