With another Bush looking weak, many Democrats are feeling good about their prospects in November, even without the dream of a job in the White House for themselves. Yet this time, a Bush won't be on the presidential ballot in November, nor will someone closely affiliated with his administration, such as the vice president. Whatever the Bush legacy may be, the 2008 presidential election shapes up as an open-seat contest. A key predictor of the model used here to forecast the outcome of that contest is the showing of the presidential nominees in primaries (hence the sobriquet Primary Model). Since American elections in November are typically preceded by primary elections earlier in the year, it is natural to inquire whether the voting in presidential primaries is a leading indicator of the vote in the general election? Remarkably so, as it turns out. How the presidential candidates do in primary elections foretells their prospects in the November election with great accuracy.
[1]
H. Norpoth.
Primary Colors: A Mixed Blessing for Al Gore
,
2001,
PS: Political Science & Politics.
[2]
Brian J. Gaines.
Popular Myths About Popular Vote-Electoral College Splits
,
2001,
PS: Political Science & Politics.
[3]
James C. Garand,et al.
Before the vote : forecasting American national elections
,
2000
.
[4]
W. Baum.
On Electoral Myth and Reality
,
1965,
American Political Science Review.
[5]
Helmut Norpoth.
From Primary to General Election: A Forecast of the Presidential Vote
,
2004,
PS: Political Science & Politics.
[6]
H. Norpoth,et al.
Electoral myth and reality: Realignments in American politics
,
2007
.
[7]
H. Norpoth.
Is Clinton Doomed? An Early Forecast for 1996
,
1995
.
[8]
H. Norpoth.
Of Time and Candidates
,
1996
.