Trust, power and interorganizational information systems: the case of the electronic trading community TransLease

This paper focuses on Cap Gemini’s electronic commerce system, TransLease. TransLease is an interorganizational information system (IOS), which facilitates electronic commerce between motor vehicle leasing and repair companies. During our investigation, the system was used by approximately 1000 repair agents working for seven of the UK’s leading vehicle leasing and contract hire companies. This system was originally developed by AT&T and acquired by Cap Gemini in July 1998. At the time of acquisition, the system was seen as being of high strategic value, although it was also seen as underperforming. This paper reports the results of an action research project, which formed one element of the process by which Cap Gemini investigated the former problem. In the paper, TransLease is described as a complex electronic community, dependent upon the existence of symbiotic relationships. As such, the problems that the system users and developers experienced can be attributed to factors that impeded the mutual benefit accruing from participation in the system. The efficacy of the terms of exchange and the degree to which participants mutually benefit through electronic interaction is determined by the complex interplay of a number of relational and organizational factors. The research therefore illustrates the importance of the ‘soft’ organizational issues in IOS management and development, and suggests a conceptual model of the factors relevant in this case. At the time of this study, TransLease was still in the early stages of its life cycle, having only been available in the marketplace for approximately 18 months. During this time, through recognizing the complex problems and issues detailed in this paper, Cap Gemini accordingly redressed the way in which the system was managed and maintained. TransLease is now seen as having matured into a highly successful example of an IOS – a view reflected by its position as market leader in the industry. As this paper will show, the key to improving the existing service has been the emphasis Cap Gemini now places on managing the ‘soft’ aspects of the electronic community.

[1]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Alexander Runge,et al.  Electronic contracting within the reference model for electronic markets , 1998, ECIS.

[3]  K. Hambridge.  Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[4]  Odd Fredriksson,et al.  Evolution of inter-organizational information systems in industrial distribution: the cases of Luna and Pappersgruppen , 1996 .

[5]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  New challenges of systems development: a vision of the 90's , 1989, DATB.

[6]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Information, Systems, And Information Systems , 1997 .

[7]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[8]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Project Research in Information Systems , 1996 .

[9]  Max D. Hopper.  Rattling SABRE—new ways to compete on information , 1990 .

[10]  F. McFarlan,et al.  Information partnerships--shared data, shared scale. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[11]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method , 1983 .

[12]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[13]  Ralph H. Sprague,et al.  The evolution of interorganizational systems , 1991, J. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Brian Wilson.  Systems: concepts, methodologies, and applications (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Effectiveness of using expert support technology for individual and small group decision making , 1998, ECIS.

[16]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[17]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[18]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[19]  Rob Kling,et al.  Behind the Terminal: The Critical Role of Computing Infrastructure In Effective Information Systems' Development and Use , 1992 .

[20]  R. Brugha,et al.  A stakeholder analysis. , 2000, Health policy and planning.

[21]  Ben M. Bensaou,et al.  Inter-organizational relationships and information technology: a conceptual synthesis and a research framework , 1996 .

[22]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Causes of Failure in Network Organizations , 1992 .

[23]  James A. Senn,et al.  Challenges and strategies for research in systems development , 1992 .

[24]  M. Bensaou,et al.  Interorganizational Cooperation: The Role of Information Technology an Empirical Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Supplier Relations , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Robin McTaggart,et al.  Is validity really an issue for participatory action research , 1998 .

[26]  T. Davenport.  Saving IT's Soul: Human-Centered Information Management. , 1994 .

[27]  Philip Powell,et al.  Inter-organisational Information Systems and the Gains From Organisational Flexibility , 1997, ECIS.

[28]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Information Technology and Industrial Cooperation: The Changing Economics of Coordination and Ownership , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Information Systems Failures , 1993 .

[30]  S. Smithson,et al.  The role of EDI in inter-organizational coordination in the European automotive industry , 1996 .

[31]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  Research Report. Can EDI Benefit Adopters? , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  R. H. Franke.  The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking , 1993 .

[33]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[34]  F. Lau,et al.  A review on the use of action research in information systems studies , 1997 .

[35]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Why information systems fail: a case study approach , 1993 .

[36]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Understanding the effects of member diversity in global virtual teams , 1998, ECIS.

[37]  R. O'Callaghan.  EDI, organizational change and flexible strategies , 1998 .

[38]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Information systems and systems thinking: time to unite? , 1988 .

[39]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[40]  D. Spar,et al.  Ruling the Net , 1996 .