Chapter 13 Human Capital and Technology Diffusion

Abstract This paper generalizes the Nelson–Phelps catch-up model of technology diffusion. We allow for the possibility that the pattern of technology diffusion can be exponential, which would predict that nations would exhibit positive catch-up with the leader nation, or logistic, in which a country with a sufficiently small capital stock may exhibit slower total factor productivity growth than the leader nation. We derive a nonlinear specification for total factor productivity growth that nests these two specifications. We estimate this specification for a cross-section of nations from 1960 through 1995. Our results support the logistic specification, and are robust to a number of sensitivity checks. Our model also appears to predict slow total factor productivity growth well. 22 of the 27 nations that we identify as lacking the critical human capital levels needed to achieve faster total factor productivity growth than the leader nation in 1960 did achieve lower growth over the next 35 years.

[1]  Stephen L. Parente,et al.  Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  M. N. Sharif,et al.  Binomial innovation diffusion models with dynamic potential adopter population , 1981 .

[4]  E. Mansfield Industrial research and technological innovation , 1968 .

[5]  D. Acemoglu Factor Prices and Technical Change: From Induced Innovations to Recent Debates , 2001 .

[6]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement , 1999 .

[7]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[8]  D. Gollin Getting Income Shares Right , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Steven N. Durlauf,et al.  Multiple regimes and cross‐country growth behaviour , 1995 .

[10]  Lee G. Branstetter Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? ☆: Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan , 2001 .

[11]  R. Nelson,et al.  Investment in humans, technological diffusion and economic growth , 1965 .

[12]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Knowledge, information, and expectations in modern macroeconomics : in honor of Edmund S. Phelps , 2003 .

[13]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  Does Schooling Cause Growth , 2000 .

[14]  Robert J. Barro,et al.  Democracy and growth , 1996 .

[15]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Appropriate Technology and Growth , 1996 .

[16]  P. Howitt,et al.  R/D, Implementation, and Stagnation: A Schumpeterian Theory of Convergence Clubs , 2002 .

[17]  M. Paul,et al.  ENDOGENOUS TECHNICAL CHANGE , 1990 .

[18]  John Duffy,et al.  A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation of the Aggregate Production Function Specification , 2000 .

[19]  J. Benhabib,et al.  The Role of Financial Development in Growth and Investment , 2000 .

[20]  Holland Hunter,et al.  Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective , 1963 .

[21]  C. I. Jones,et al.  Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others? , 1998 .

[22]  P. Geroski Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[23]  Nazrul Islam,et al.  Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach , 1995 .

[24]  Finis Welch Human Capital Theory: Education, Discrimination, and Lifecycles, , 1975 .

[25]  Peter J. Klenow,et al.  The Neoclassical Revival in Growth Economics: Has It Gone Too Far? , 1997, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[26]  Norman V. Loayza,et al.  Has Latin America's Post-Reform Growth Been Disappointing? , 1996 .

[27]  Robert J. Barro,et al.  Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth , 1995 .

[28]  Jonathan R.W. Temple,et al.  The New Growth Evidence , 1999 .

[29]  Jerik Hanushek,et al.  Schooling, Labor-force Quality, and the Growth of Nations , 2000 .

[30]  E. Helpman Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights , 1992 .

[31]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[32]  P. Segerstrom Innovation, Imitation, and Economic Growth , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  F. J. Richards A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use , 1959 .

[34]  F. Lichtenberg,et al.  The Comparative Advantage of Educated Workers in Implementing New Technology , 1987 .

[35]  Lee Branstetter Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope? Microeconometric Evidence from the Japan and the United States , 1996 .

[36]  Seongjun Kim,et al.  International R&D Spillovers, Trade and Productivity in Major OECD Countries , 1996 .

[37]  Francesco Caselli,et al.  Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at cross-country growth empirics , 1996 .

[38]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation: An example , 1997 .

[39]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[40]  R. Barro,et al.  International Comparisons of Educational Attainment , 1993 .

[41]  R. Banks Growth and diffusion phenomena , 1993 .

[42]  Wolfgang Keller,et al.  Are international R&D spillovers trade-related?: Analyzing spillovers among randomly matched trade partners , 1998 .

[43]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers and Inequality , 2002 .

[44]  Jess Benhabib,et al.  The role of human capital in economic development Evidence from aggregate cross-country data , 1994 .

[45]  Gene M. Grossman,et al.  Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth , 1991 .

[46]  P. Aghion,et al.  Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth , 2002 .