Curvature Weighted Decimation: A Novel, Curvature-Based Approach to Improved Lidar Point Decimation of Terrain Surfaces

Increased availability of QL1/QL2 Lidar terrain data has resulted in large datasets, often including large quantities of redundant points. Because of these large memory requirements, practitioners often use decimation to reduce the number of points used to create models. This paper introduces a novel approach to improve decimation, thereby reducing the total count of ground points in a Lidar dataset while retaining more accuracy than Random Decimation. This reduction improves efficiency of downstream processes while maintaining output quality nearer to the undecimated dataset. Points are selected for retention based on their discrete curvature values computed from the mesh geometry of the TIN model of the points. Points with higher curvature values are preferred for retention in the resulting point cloud. We call this technique Curvature Weighted Decimation (CWD). We implement CWD in a new free, open-source software tool, CogoDN, which is also introduced in this paper. We evaluate the effectiveness of CWD against Random Decimation by comparing the resulting introduced error values for the two kinds of decimation over multiple decimation percentages, multiple statistical types, and multiple terrain types. The results show that CWD reduces introduced error values over Random Decimation when 15 to 50% of the points are retained.

[1]  H. Mitásová,et al.  Point Density Variations in Airborne Lidar Point Clouds , 2023, Sensors.

[2]  Leila De Floriani,et al.  Efficient topology-aware simplification of large triangulated terrains , 2021, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[3]  Cheng Han,et al.  Simplification Algorithm of half-edge collapse 3D Model Based on Weighted Curvature , 2021, 2021 International Conference on Electronic Information Engineering and Computer Science (EIECS).

[4]  Mihai-Sorin Stupariu,et al.  Discrete curvatures of triangle meshes: From approximation of smooth surfaces to digital terrain data , 2021, Comput. Geosci..

[5]  Stéphane Guinard,et al.  Simplicial complexes Reconstruction and Generalisation of 3D LiDAR Data in Urban Scenes. (Reconstruction et GénéRalisation de complexes simpliciaux à partir de scans LiDAR de SCèNES urbaines) , 2020 .

[6]  Loïc Barthe,et al.  Proximity-aware multiple meshes decimation using quadric error metric , 2020, Graph. Model..

[7]  M. Uysal,et al.  Comparison of data reduction algorithms for LiDAR-derived digital terrain model generalisation , 2016 .

[8]  H. Mitásová,et al.  Processing Uav and LIDAR Point Clouds in Grass GIS , 2016 .

[9]  A. S. Toprak,et al.  An investigation of DEM generation process based on LiDAR data filtering, decimation, and interpolation methods for an urban area , 2015 .

[10]  Paul Gray,et al.  LiDAR data reduction using vertex decimation and processing with GPGPU and multicore CPU technology , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[11]  Peng Wang,et al.  Mesh simplification algorithm based on absolute curvature-weighted quadric error metrics , 2010, 2010 5th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications.

[12]  Michael Garland,et al.  Surface simplification using quadric error metrics , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[13]  Bernd Hamann,et al.  A data reduction scheme for triangulated surfaces , 1994, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[14]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Decimation of triangle meshes , 1992, SIGGRAPH.

[15]  J. Preston Ξ-filters , 1983 .

[16]  F. Baumann Surface Simplification Using Quadric Error Metrics , 2018 .

[17]  E. Grinspun Discrete differential geometry : An applied introduction , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.