Determinants and Prognostic Impact of Heart Failure Complicating Acute Coronary Syndromes: Observations From the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)

Background—Few data are available on the impact of heart failure (HF) across all types of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods and Results—The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) is a prospective study of patients hospitalized with ACS. Data from 16 166 patients were analyzed: 13 707 patients without prior HF or cardiogenic shock at presentation were identified. Of these, 1778 (13%) had an admission diagnosis of HF (Killip class II or III). HF on admission was associated with a marked increase in mortality rates during hospitalization (12.0% versus 2.9% [with versus without HF], P <0.0001) and at 6 months after discharge (8.5% versus 2.8%, P <0.0001). Of note, HF increased mortality rates in patients with unstable angina (defined as ACS with normal biochemical markers of necrosis; mortality rates: 6.7% with versus 1.6% without HF at admission, P <0.0001). By logistic regression analysis, admission HF was an independent predictor of hospital death (odds ratio, 2.2; P <0.0001). Admission HF was associated with longer hospital stay and higher readmission rates. Patients with HF had lower rates of catheterization and percutaneous cardiac intervention, and fewer received &bgr;-blockers and statins. Hospital development of HF (versus HF on presentation) was associated with an even higher in-hospital mortality rate (17.8% versus 12.0%, P <0.0001). In patients with HF, in-hospital revascularization was associated with lower 6-month death rates (14.0% versus 23.7%, P <0.0001; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.68, P <0.0001). Conclusions—In this observational registry, heart failure was associated with reduced hospital and 6-month survival across all ACS subsets, including patients with normal markers of necrosis. More aggressive treatment of these patients may be warranted to improve prognosis.

[1]  C. O'connor,et al.  Frequency, patient characteristics, and outcomes of mild-to-moderate heart failure complicating ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: lessons from 4 international fibrinolytic therapy trials. , 2003, American heart journal.

[2]  K. Eagle,et al.  Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  L. Parsons,et al.  Hospital outcomes in patients presenting with congestive heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2). , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  K. Fox,et al.  Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[5]  B. Gersh,et al.  Heart failure after myocardial infarction: a review. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[6]  W Klein,et al.  Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). , 2002, European heart journal.

[7]  J. Gore,et al.  Heterogeneity in the Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Heart Failure: The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction , 2002, Circulation.

[8]  L. Wallentin,et al.  Early revascularisation and 1-year survival in 14-day survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study , 2002, The Lancet.

[9]  C. Vassanelli,et al.  [Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban]. , 2001, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[10]  L. Grines,et al.  Predictive value of the Killip classification in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  Grace Investigators,et al.  Rationale and design of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) Project: a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes. , 2001, American heart journal.

[12]  H. White,et al.  One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. , 2001, JAMA.

[13]  L. Wallentin,et al.  Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[14]  E. Bates,et al.  The enduring value of Killip classification. , 1999, American heart journal.

[15]  R. Bonow,et al.  Chronic heart failure in the United States: a manifestation of coronary artery disease. , 1998, Circulation.

[16]  V. Boyko,et al.  Usefulness of the Killip classification for early risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the 1990s compared with those treated in the 1980s. Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Group and the Secondary Prevention Reinfarction Israeli Nifedipine Trial (SPRINT) Study Group. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  C M O'Connor,et al.  Clinical determinants of mortality in patients with angiographically diagnosed ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  J. Rouleau,et al.  Myocardial infarction patients in the 1990s--their risk factors, stratification and survival in Canada: the Canadian Assessment of Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Study. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  J Col,et al.  Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. GUSTO-I Investigators. , 1995, Circulation.

[20]  J. Herlitz,et al.  Characteristics and prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction in relation to occurrence of congestive heart failure. , 1994, European heart journal.

[21]  G. Lamas,et al.  Development and prevention of congestive heart failure following myocardial infarction. , 1993, Circulation.

[22]  J. Remes,et al.  Validity of clinical diagnosis of heart failure in primary health care. , 1991, European heart journal.

[23]  L. Stevenson,et al.  The limited reliability of physical signs for estimating hemodynamics in chronic heart failure. , 1989, JAMA.

[24]  T. Killip,et al.  Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. , 1967, The American journal of cardiology.