Higher-level mechanisms detect facial symmetry

The role of symmetry detection in early visual processing and the sensitivity of biological visual systems to symmetry across a wide range of organisms suggest that symmetry can be detected by low-level visual mechanisms. However, computational and functional considerations suggest that higher-level mechanisms may also play a role in facial symmetry detection. We tested this hypothesis by examining whether symmetry detection is better for faces than comparable patterns, which share low-level properties with faces. Symmetry detection was better for upright faces than for inverted faces (experiment 1) and contrast-reversed faces (experiment 2), implicating high-level mechanisms in facial symmetry detection. In addition, facial symmetry detection was sensitive to spatial scale, unlike low-level symmetry detection mechanisms (experiment 3), and showed greater sensitivity to a 45° deviation from vertical than is found for other aspects of face perception (experiment 4). These results implicate specialized, higher-level mechanisms in the detection of facial symmetry. This specialization may reflect perceptual learning resulting from extensive experience detecting symmetry in faces or evolutionary selection pressures associated with the important role of facial symmetry in mate choice and ‘mind-reading’ or both.

[1]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  R. Johnstone.  Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.

[3]  A. Cowey,et al.  Sensitivity to eye gaze in prosopagnosic patients and monkeys with superior temporal sulcus ablation , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  James M. Donovan.  Facial Attractiveness : Evolutionary , Cognitive , and Social Perspectives , 2003 .

[5]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Sensitivity to “Bad Genes” and the Anomalous Face Overgeneralization Effect: Cue Validity, Cue Utilization, and Accuracy in Judging Intelligence and Health , 2004 .

[6]  M. Farah.  Is face recognition ‘special’? Evidence from neuropsychology , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  Frances Wilkinson,et al.  Symmetry perception: a novel approach for biological shapes , 2002, Vision Research.

[8]  Linda Jeffery,et al.  Are Average and Symmetric Faces Attractive to Infants? Discrimination and Looking Preferences , 2002, Perception.

[9]  M. Tarr,et al.  Learning to see faces and objects , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  R. Dolan,et al.  Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[12]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .

[14]  J. Wolfe,et al.  On the Role of Symmetry in Visual Search , 1992 .

[15]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[16]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Thatcher Illusion: Dependence on Angle of Rotation , 2000, Perception.

[17]  D. Burr,et al.  A feature–based model of symmetry detection , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  I. Penton-Voak,et al.  Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Attractiveness , 2002 .

[19]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[20]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Gaze detection and the cortical processing of faces: Evidence from infants and adults , 1995 .

[21]  H. Wilson,et al.  Perception of head orientation , 2000, Vision Research.

[22]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[24]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[25]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[26]  R. Galper,et al.  Recognition of faces in photographic negative , 1970 .

[27]  Stephane J. M. Rainville,et al.  Scale invariance is driven by stimulus density , 2002, Vision Research.

[28]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[30]  Jon Driver,et al.  Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect , 1992, Nature.

[31]  John C. Marshall,et al.  The Yin and the Yang of visuo-spatial neglect: A case study , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty , 2001, Perception.

[33]  R. Thornhill,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL STABILITY, DISEASE AND MEDICINE , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[34]  A. Little,et al.  Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Jon Driver,et al.  The positive and negative of human expertise in gaze perception , 2000, Cognition.

[36]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability , 2004 .

[37]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[38]  S. Dakin,et al.  The spatial region of integration for visual symmetry detection , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  M. Corballis,et al.  The Psychology of Left and Right , 2020 .

[40]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[41]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[42]  J. Stevenson,et al.  Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution , 2000 .

[43]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Orientation-Contingent Face Aftereffects and Implications for Face-Coding Mechanisms , 2004, Current Biology.

[44]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  The Thatcher Illusion as a Test of Configural Disruption , 1997, Perception.

[45]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  G. Hole,et al.  Evidence for Holistic Processing of Faces Viewed as Photographic Negatives , 1999, Perception.

[47]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Salience of Vertical Symmetry , 1994, Perception.

[49]  L. Mealey,et al.  Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  The spatial mechanisms mediating symmetry perception , 1997, Vision Research.

[51]  M. Enquist,et al.  Experimental evidence of receiver bias for symmetry , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  J. Saunders,et al.  Perception of 3D surface orientation from skew symmetry , 2001, Vision Research.

[53]  R. Thornhill,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL STABILITY, DISEASE AND MEDICINE , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[54]  George Adrian Horridge,et al.  Shape vision in bees: innate preference for flower-like patterns , 1995 .

[55]  Jon Driver,et al.  Obligatory edge-assignment in vision: The role of figure and part segmentation in symmetry detection. , 1995 .

[56]  R. Näsänen.  Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.