Assessment of solar photovoltaic technologies using multiple perspectives and hierarchical decision modeling: Manufacturers worldview

The assessment of photovoltaic technologies using multiple perspectives such as social, technological, economic, environmental, and political (STEEP) have become increasingly important in the last several years. Each perspective is composed of multiple criteria with the social and political perspectives gaining more significance. A hierarchical decision model using expert judgment quantification was developed to provide the relative ranking of the criteria. Such modeling is effective in assessing technologies considering multiple competing perspectives and criteria. The model was operationalized via desirability functions for each criterion. The combined results provide scores for each technology and indicate in which criteria the technology needs improvement. In earlier research the electric utility worldview was considered to assess multiple photovoltaic technologies. In this paper the solar photovoltaic manufacturer worldview case study is presented.

[1]  Nathasit Gerdsri Strategic Planning: A Quantitative Model for the Strategic Evaluation of Emerging Technologies , 2016 .

[2]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems , 1991 .

[3]  Harold A. Linstone Multiple perspectives redux , 2010 .

[4]  Evert Nieuwlaar,et al.  Energy viability of photovoltaic systems , 2000 .

[5]  Akio Takeoka,et al.  Advanced Photovoltaic Technologies and the GENESIS Project , 1996 .

[6]  M N Sharif,et al.  A Quantitative Model for the Evaluation of Technological Alternatives : Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 1983 .

[7]  Y. Esra Albayrak,et al.  An Analytic Network Process approach to the planning and managing of the energy politics , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering.

[8]  Lawrence L. Kazmerski,et al.  Photovoltaics: A review of cell and module technologies , 1997 .

[9]  I. Linkov,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Comprehensive Decision Approach for Management of Contaminated Sediments , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Yung-Chi Shen,et al.  An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology , 2010 .

[11]  M. Ramachandran,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .

[12]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  R. Brook,et al.  Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. , 1984, American journal of public health.

[14]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hi , 2002 .

[15]  Adrian Ilinca,et al.  Energy storage systems—Characteristics and comparisons , 2008 .

[16]  I. Dincer Environmental impacts of energy , 1999 .

[17]  Robert K. Dixon,et al.  US energy conservation and efficiency policies: Challenges and opportunities , 2010 .

[18]  G. Garnero,et al.  The territorial and landscape impacts of photovoltaic systems: Definition of impacts and assessment of the glare risk , 2009 .

[19]  Costas S. Mitropoulos,et al.  Energy-economy models: A survey , 1982 .

[20]  Harold A. Linstone Decision making for technological executives: using multiple perspectives to improve performance [Review Reviews] , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[21]  Adrien Presley,et al.  R&D project selection using the analytic network process , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[22]  H. Scheer,et al.  Solar energy's economic and social benefits , 1995 .

[23]  A. Menegaki Valuation for renewable energy: A comparative review , 2008 .

[24]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  Use of multiple perspectives and decision modeling for PV technology assessment , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET).

[25]  D. F. Kocaoglu,et al.  Assessment of Solar Photovoltaic Technologies Using Multiple Perspectives and Hierarchical Decision Modeling: Policy Makers Worldview , 2014 .

[26]  Brian Azzopardi,et al.  Life cycle analysis for future photovoltaic systems using hybrid solar cells , 2010 .

[27]  Shimon Awerbuch,et al.  Investing in photovoltaics: risk, accounting and the value of new technology , 2000 .

[28]  L. Frantzis,et al.  Rooftop Photovoltaics Market Penetration Scenarios , 2008 .

[29]  Harold A. Linstone Decision Making for Technology Executives , 1999 .

[30]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: The case of renewable energy use in Austria , 2007 .

[31]  Pisek Gerdsri,et al.  A systematic approach to developing national technology policy and strategy for emerging technologies: A case study of nanotechnology for Thailand's agriculture industry , 2009, PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[32]  Reinhard Haas,et al.  Market deployment strategies for photovoltaics: an international review , 2003 .

[33]  Mark Clayton Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in education , 1997 .

[34]  G. W. Braun,et al.  Experience Scaling Up Manufacturing of Emerging Photovoltaic Technologies , 2007 .

[35]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  Assessment of Solar Photovoltaic Technologies Using Multiple Perspectives and Decision Modeling , 2013 .

[36]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Multiple Perspectives: Overcoming the Weaknesses of MS/OR , 1985 .

[37]  S. Iniyan,et al.  A review of energy models , 2006 .

[38]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of solar photovoltaic technologies: Literature review , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of PICMET '11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET).

[39]  Dundar F. Kocaoglu,et al.  A participative approach to program evaluation , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[40]  Vinod Mubayi,et al.  Modelling energy-economic interactions in developing countries: a linear-programming approach , 1981 .

[41]  J. Zuboy,et al.  Nontechnical Barriers to Solar Energy Use: Review of Recent Literature , 2006 .

[42]  A. Maldonado,et al.  Physical properties of ZnO:F obtained from a fresh and aged solution of zinc acetate and zinc acetylacetonate , 2006 .

[43]  Morten Elle,et al.  Learning from the social construction of environmental indicators: From the retrospective to the pro-active use of SCOT in technology development , 2010 .

[44]  Ron Vreeker,et al.  Selecting an Appropriate Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Technique for Renewable Energy Planning , 2006 .

[45]  Haris Ch. Doukas,et al.  Multi-criteria decision aid for the formulation of sustainable technological energy priorities using linguistic variables , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Renewable Energy Policies that Impact Climate Change – The Case for Photovoltaic Solar Technology , 2012 .

[47]  Bruce F. Baird,et al.  Managerial Decisions Under Uncertainty: An Introduction to the Analysis of Decision Making , 1989 .

[48]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[49]  Laurence Goldman,et al.  Social impact analysis : an applied anthropology manual , 2000 .

[50]  N. Gerdsri An analytical approach to building a technology development envelope (TDE) for roadmapping of emerging technologies , 2005, A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries Technology Management:.

[51]  T. Tsoutsos,et al.  Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies , 2005 .

[52]  Carlos Henggeler Antunes,et al.  MCDA and Energy Planning , 2005 .

[53]  D. Haralambopoulos,et al.  Renewable energy systems: A societal and technological platform , 2007 .

[54]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling : A new approach to the study of hidden populations , 1997 .

[55]  EnergyInformationAdministration Annual Energy Outlook 2008 With Projections to 2030 , 2008 .

[56]  Anne B. Knol,et al.  Expert elicitation: methodological suggestions for its use in environmental health impact assessments , 2008 .

[57]  José Alberto Fuinhas,et al.  Motivations driving renewable energy in European countries: A panel data approach , 2010 .

[58]  Betsy Van der Veer Martens,et al.  Mapping research specialties , 2008, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[59]  Hongyi Chen Sensitivity analysis for hierarchical decision models , 2007 .

[60]  Tim D. Jackson,et al.  The viability of solar photovoltaics , 2000 .

[61]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Operational gaming for energy policy analysis , 1977 .

[62]  Parin Mukeshkumar Shah,et al.  Expert Finding Using Social Networking , 2009 .

[63]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis as an aid to the strategic planning of energy R & D , 1986 .

[64]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  The multiple perspective concept: With applications to technology assessment and other decision areas , 1981 .

[65]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update , 2006 .

[66]  Gianluca Demartini Finding Experts Using Wikipedia , 2007, FEWS.

[67]  Heracles Polatidis,et al.  Decomposition Analysis and Design of Sustainable Renewable Energy Systems: A New Approach , 2007 .

[68]  Fausto Cavallaro,et al.  A comparative assessment of thin-film photovoltaic production processes using the ELECTRE III method , 2010 .

[69]  William W. Cobern,et al.  World View Theory and Science Education Research: Fundamental Epistemological Structure as a Critical Factor in Science Learning and Attitude Development. , 1989 .

[70]  Mehrdad Mohammadi,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Selection Model with Application to Chemical Engineering Management Decisions , 2009 .

[71]  Zhengming Zhao,et al.  Grid-connected photovoltaic power systems: Technical and potential problems—A review , 2010 .

[72]  E. Løken Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems , 2007 .

[73]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Expert assessments of future photovoltaic technologies. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[74]  B. Marion,et al.  Performance parameters for grid-connected PV systems , 2005, Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005..

[75]  Marion A. Hersh,et al.  Sustainable decision making: the role of decision support systems , 1999, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[76]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[77]  S. Berg Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[78]  David J. Sheskin,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 1997 .

[79]  Natalie L. Sproull,et al.  Handbook of Research Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Students in the Social Sciences , 1988 .

[80]  Jane M. Booker,et al.  Eliciting and analyzing expert judgement - a practical guide , 2001, ASA-SIAM series on statistics and applied probability.

[81]  C M Goodman,et al.  The Delphi technique: a critique. , 1987, Journal of advanced nursing.

[82]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Organic photovoltaics: technology and market , 2004 .

[83]  Janine Nahapiet A Social Perspective , 2011 .

[84]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[85]  David A. Harris DO NOT ENTER , 2005 .

[86]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[87]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[88]  Chi-Jen Yang,et al.  Reconsidering solar grid parity , 2010 .

[89]  Lord Howell,et al.  A Political Perspective , 2005 .