Latch-bridge model in smooth muscle: [Ca2+]i can quantitatively predict stress.

Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+])-dependent cross-bridge phosphorylation by myosin light chain kinase is postulated to be the primary regulator of stress development in smooth muscle. A four-state model of cross-bridge function, regulated only by [Ca2+]-dependent changes in myosin kinase activity, has been proposed to explain contraction and the latch state of smooth muscle (high force with reduced cross-bridge cycling and ATP consumption). A key test of this model is to determine whether changes in myoplasmic [Ca2+], per se, can quantitatively predict changes in myosin kinase activity, cross-bridge phosphorylation, and therefore force production. We find that changes in aequorin-estimated myoplasmic [Ca2+] can quantitatively predict the time course of phosphorylation and isometric stress production in response to stimulation with histamine and angiotensin II and during adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate-mediated relaxation when [Ca2+] is not changing rapidly. These results suggest that changes in myoplasmic [Ca2+] and activation of myosin light chain kinase may be sufficient to explain both contraction and relaxation of agonist stimulated swine carotid arterial smooth muscle.

[1]  K. Morgan,et al.  Stimulus‐specific patterns of intracellular calcium levels in smooth muscle of ferret portal vein. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  C. Slaughter,et al.  Sites phosphorylated in myosin light chain in contracting smooth muscle. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[3]  Y. Goldman,et al.  Kinetics of contraction initiated by flash photolysis of caged adenosine triphosphate in tonic and phasic smooth muscles , 1989, The Journal of general physiology.

[4]  P. L. Becker,et al.  Relationship between force and Ca2+ concentration in smooth muscle as revealed by measurements on single cells. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  B. Himpens,et al.  Free‐calcium and force transients during depolarization and pharmacomechanical coupling in guinea‐pig smooth muscle. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. Stull,et al.  Activation of smooth muscle contraction: relation between myosin phosphorylation and stiffness. , 1986, Science.

[7]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Regulation of myosin phosphorylation. , 1982, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[8]  C. Rembold,et al.  Desensitization of swine arterial smooth muscle to transplasmalemmal Ca2+ influx. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  Stephen J. Smith,et al.  Calcium ions, active zones and synaptic transmitter release , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  T. Butler,et al.  Cytoplasmic free calcium, myosin light chain phosphorylation, and force in phasic and tonic smooth muscle , 1988, The Journal of general physiology.

[11]  R. A. Murphy,et al.  Myoplasmic [Ca2+] Determines Myosin Phosphorylation in Agonist‐Stimulated Swine Arterial Smooth Muscle , 1988, Circulation research.

[12]  J. Stull,et al.  Regulation of smooth muscle contractile elements by second messengers. , 1989, Annual review of physiology.

[13]  S. Driska,et al.  Histamine‐Induced Rhythmic Contraction of Hog Carotid Artery Smooth Muscle , 1984, Circulation research.

[14]  R. A. Murphy,et al.  Maximal rates of activation in electrically stimulated swine carotid media. , 1987, Circulation research.