Cognitive Style and Self-Efficacy: Predicting Student Success in Online Distance Education

This study was designed to identify those learner attributes that may be used to predict student success (in terms of grade point average) in a Web-based distance education setting. Students enrolled in six Web-based, general education distance education courses at a community college were asked to complete the Group Embedded Figures Test for field dependence/independence and the Online Technologies Self-Efficacy Scale to determine their entry-level confidence with necessary computer skills for online learning. Although the students who were more field independent tended to have higher online technologies self-efficacy, they did not receive higher grades than those students who were field dependent and had lower online technologies self-efficacy. Cognitive style scores and online technologies self-efficacy scores were poor predictors of student success in online distance education courses.

[1]  Albert Bandura,et al.  Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing societies , 1995 .

[2]  Chong Ho Yu,et al.  Validation of the Online Technologies Self-Efficacy Scale (OTSES). , 2000 .

[3]  E. Yalow.  Educational psychology: A cognitive view. 2nd ed. , 1978 .

[4]  G. Miller,et al.  Are Distance Education Programs More Acceptable to Field-Independent Learners? , 1997 .

[5]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[6]  P. Navarro,et al.  Performance and perceptions of distance learners in cyberspace , 2000 .

[7]  M. Bong,et al.  Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction , 2000 .

[8]  T. Newby,et al.  Instruction: Classroom lecture/discussion vs. Live televised instruction: A comparison of effects on student performance, attitude, and interaction , 1989 .

[9]  H. A. Witkin.  A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[10]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Impact of Learning Styles on Instructional Design for Distance Education. , 1993 .

[11]  E. Yalow.  On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[12]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[13]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners , 1994 .

[14]  Michael Z. Hackman,et al.  Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction , 1990 .

[15]  Donna Gee.  The Impact of Students' Preferred Learning Style Variables in a Distance Education Course: A Case Study. , 1990 .

[16]  M. Moore.  Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[17]  D. R. Garrison,et al.  An analysis and evaluation of audio teleconferencing to facilitate education at a distance , 1990 .

[18]  J. T. Ogle.  The Effects of Virtual Environments on Recall in Participants of Differing Levels of Field Dependence , 2002 .

[19]  Chere Campbell Coggins,et al.  Learner: Preferred learning styles and their impact on completion of external degree programs 1 , 1988 .

[20]  M. Moore.  The Theory of Transactional Distance , 2012, Handbook of Distance Education.

[21]  D. Stevens.  Cognitive Processes and Success of Students in Instructional Computer Courses , 1983 .

[22]  Farhad Saba,et al.  Verifying Key Theoretical Concepts in a Dynamic Model of Distance Education. , 1994 .

[23]  M. Moore.  Learner Autonomy: The Second Dimension of Independent Learning. , 1972 .