Consistent accuracy of the Australian weed risk assessment system across varied geographies

The ecological and economic advantages of preventing introduction of species likely to become invasive have increased interest in implementing effective screening tools. We compared the accuracy of the Australian Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) system with that across the six geographies in which it has been tested (New Zealand, Hawaii, Hawaii and Pacific Islands, Czech Republic, Bonin Islands and Florida). Inclusion in four of the tests of a secondary screening tool, developed to reduce the number of species requiring further evaluation, decreased the number of species with that outcome by over 60% on average. Averaging across all tests demonstrated that the WRA system accurately identified major invaders 90%, and non-invaders 70%, of the time. Examined differently, a species of unknown invasive potential is on average likely to be correctly accepted or rejected over 80% of the time for all of these geographies when minor invaders are categorized as invasive. Whereas increasing consistency in definitions and implementation would facilitate understanding of the general application of the WRA system, we believe that this tool functions similarly across islands and continents in tropical and temperate climates and has been sufficiently tested to be adopted as an initial screen for plant species proposed for introduction to a new geography.

[1]  R. P. Randall,et al.  Plant introductions in Australia: how can we resolve 'weedy' conflicts of interest? , 2004 .

[2]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  When to Ignore Advice: Invasion Predictions and Decision Theory , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[3]  Sarah H. Reichard,et al.  Predicting Invasions of Woody Plants Introduced into North America , 1997, Conservation Biology.

[4]  Richard N. Mack,et al.  Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. , 1996 .

[5]  K. Havens,et al.  Implementing Invasive Screening Procedures: The Chicago Botanic Garden Model1 , 2004 .

[6]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[7]  J. Mcneely.  Global strategy on invasive alien species , 2001 .

[8]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe) , 2006 .

[9]  D. Richardson,et al.  Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations , 2004 .

[10]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  P. Dixon,et al.  Models for Predicting the Risk of Naturalization of NonNative Woody Plants in Iowa , 2004 .

[12]  P. Pheloung,et al.  A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions , 1999 .

[13]  C. Daehler,et al.  Predicting Invasive Plants: Prospects for a General Screening System Based on Current Regional Models , 2000, Biological Invasions.

[14]  Doria R. Gordon,et al.  Predicting Invasive Plants in Florida Using the Australian Weed Risk Assessment , 2008, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[15]  Reuben P Keller,et al.  Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective , 2002 .

[17]  D. Lodge,et al.  An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  J. Denslow,et al.  A Risk‐Assessment System for Screening Out Invasive Pest Plants from Hawaii and Other Pacific Islands , 2004 .

[19]  G. Hughes,et al.  Evaluating predictive models with application in regulatory policy for invasive weeds , 2003 .

[20]  R. N. Mack.  Predicting the Identity of Plant Invaders: Future Contributions from Horticulture , 2005 .

[21]  P. Pheloung,et al.  Determining the weed potential of new plant introductions to Australia , 1995 .

[22]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in predictions of invasiveness, with emphasis on weed risk assessment , 2007, Biological Invasions.

[23]  C. J. West,et al.  Environmental weeds in Australia and New Zealand: issues and approaches to management , 2000 .

[24]  Viv Bewick,et al.  Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves , 2004, Critical care.

[25]  W. Rice.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  F. Panetta.  A system of assessing proposed plant introductions for weed potential. , 1993 .

[27]  Petra M. Kuhnert,et al.  Application and evaluation of classification trees for screening unwanted plants , 2006 .

[28]  J. Schnase,et al.  Risk Analysis for Biological Hazards: What We Need to Know about Invasive Species , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.