Selective imaging strategies for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.

BACKGROUND We previously reported an appendiceal imaging protocol in which children with equivocal clinical presentations for acute appendicitis undergo ultrasonography (US) followed by computed tomography (CT). However, risk groups of children who would benefit most from imaging studies have not been established. OBJECTIVE To define and test selective imaging guidelines to increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary testing for children with suspected appendicitis. METHODS We modeled outcomes under 3 different management guidelines. Patients were risk-stratified by a recursive partitioning analysis of a retrospective cohort. Subjects included children with equivocal presentations of acute appendicitis evaluated between January 1996 and December 1999. By using recursive partitioning, 3 risk groups were identified: low, medium, and high risk for acute appendicitis. Three imaging guidelines were defined. Under the first guideline, representing standard clinical practice at Children's Hospital Boston at the time of the study, all children with equivocal signs and symptoms for acute appendicitis undergo US first. If the US is positive, the child proceeds to appendectomy. If the US is negative, the child undergoes CT. Under guideline 2, low-risk children undergo US and, if negative, are discharged from the hospital. High-risk children undergo CT, and medium-risk children undergo US followed by CT. Under the third guideline, low-risk children undergo no imaging and are admitted for observation. High-risk children proceed directly to appendectomy without imaging studies. Medium-risk children undergo US followed by CT. Clinical outcomes and the number of imaging studies performed were modeled under current practice and under each guideline. RESULTS Identified were 1401 cases of equivocal appendicitis; 958 (68.4%) with complete data. The mean age was 11 +/- 4.3 years. Of 958 children, 588 (61.4%) had acute appendicitis. One hundred forty-three patients were in the low-risk group, defined as neutrophils <or=67%, bands <5%, and no guarding on abdominal examination. Fifteen (10%) children had appendicitis. Two hundred twenty-five were high-risk for appendicitis defined as neutrophils >67%, white blood cell count >10,000/mm(3), guarding, and abdominal pain >13 hours. Of these, 202 (90%) had appendicitis. Under guideline 1, there were 22 negative appendectomies, 35 missed or delayed diagnoses, and 958 USs and 673 CT scans performed. Under guideline 2, there would have been 23 negative appendectomies, 36 missed or delayed diagnoses, and 733 USs and 637 CT scans performed. Under guideline 3, there would have been 36 negative appendectomies, 37 missed or delayed diagnoses, and 590 USs and 412 CT scans performed. CONCLUSIONS Selective imaging guidelines can reduce the number of radiographic studies performed with minimal diminution in accuracy of diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis.

[1]  T. Burkhard,et al.  Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon's clinical impression. , 1993, Archives of surgery.

[2]  S. Rubin,et al.  Ultrasonography in the management of possible appendicitis in childhood. , 1990, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[3]  R. Novelline,et al.  Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. , 1997, Radiology.

[4]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  K. Mandl,et al.  Costs and Effectiveness of Ultrasonography and Limited Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Appendicitis in Children , 2000, Pediatrics.

[6]  N. Gagliano,et al.  Appendicitis in children. , 1990, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[7]  M. Radford,et al.  Probability of appendicitis before and after observation. , 1989, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  T. Jaksic,et al.  Importance of diarrhea as a presenting symptom of appendicitis in very young children. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[9]  A S Brody,et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  K. Mandl,et al.  Effect of an imaging protocol on clinical outcomes among pediatric patients with appendicitis. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[12]  T. C. Moore,et al.  Appendicitis in children aged 13 years and younger. , 1990, American journal of surgery.

[13]  J. Izbicki,et al.  Accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a retrospective and prospective analysis of 686 patients. , 1992, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[14]  J. Haller,et al.  Intensive in-hospital observation: a safe way to decrease unnecessary appendectomy. , 1975, The American surgeon.

[15]  R. Dittus,et al.  Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. , 1996, Pediatrics.

[16]  Y. Shyr,et al.  Unenhanced limited CT of the abdomen in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children: comparison with sonography. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  D. Lund,et al.  Management of perforated appendicitis in children: a decade of aggressive treatment. , 1994, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[18]  M. Mullins,et al.  Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children using limited helical CT and colonic contrast material. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Does this patient have appendicitis , 1996 .

[20]  C. Magnant,et al.  Observation versus operation for abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant. Roles of the clinical examination and the leukocyte count. , 1986, American journal of surgery.

[21]  R. Satava,et al.  Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. , 1992, The American surgeon.

[22]  W. Rappaport,et al.  Factors responsible for the high perforation rate seen in early childhood appendicitis. , 1989, The American surgeon.

[23]  S. Rothrock,et al.  Clinical features of misdiagnosed appendicitis in children. , 1991, Annals of emergency medicine.

[24]  M. Miller,et al.  Appendicitis: Usefulness of US in diagnosis in a pediatric population , 1993 .

[25]  M. Schluchter,et al.  Imaging evaluation of suspected appendicitis in a pediatric population: effectiveness of sonography versus CT. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  R. Senbanjo Management of patients with equivocal signs of appendicitis. , 1997, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[27]  F. Lewis,et al.  Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. , 1975, Archives of surgery.

[28]  K D Mandl,et al.  Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children. , 1999, JAMA.

[29]  P. Skaane,et al.  Routine ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a valuable tool in daily practice? , 1997, The American surgeon.

[30]  S. Rothrock,et al.  Acute appendicitis in children: emergency department diagnosis and management. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[31]  T. Koepsell,et al.  Childhood appendicitis: factors associated with perforation. , 1985, Pediatrics.