Perceiving Political Polarization in the United States

An important component of political polarization in the United States is the degree to which ordinary people perceive political polarization. We used over 30 years of national survey data from the American National Election Study to examine how the public perceives political polarization between the Democratic and Republican parties and between Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. People in the United States consistently overestimate polarization between the attitudes of Democrats and Republicans. People who perceive the greatest political polarization are most likely to report having been politically active, including voting, trying to sway others’ political beliefs, and making campaign contributions. We present a 3-factor framework to understand ordinary people’s perceptions of political polarization. We suggest that people perceive greater political polarization when they (a) estimate the attitudes of those categorized as being in the “opposing group”; (b) identify strongly as either Democrat or Republican; and (c) hold relatively extreme partisan attitudes—particularly when those partisan attitudes align with their own partisan political identity. These patterns of polarization perception occur among both Democrats and Republicans.

[1]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Ideology and Prejudice , 2013, Psychological science.

[2]  Matthew S. Levendusky,et al.  Red States vs. Blue States: Going Beyond the Mean , 2011 .

[3]  L. Ross,et al.  Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution , 1995 .

[4]  L. Ross,et al.  The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others , 2002 .

[5]  S. Gaertner,et al.  Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: a meta-analytic review. , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[6]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[7]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Pluralistic Ignorance and the Perpetuation of Social Norms by Unwitting Actors , 1996 .

[8]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[9]  P. Converse The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[10]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Ideology Its Resurgence in Social , Personality , and Political Psychology , 2008 .

[11]  K. Jones,et al.  Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data* , 2014, Political Science Research and Methods.

[12]  J. Henrich,et al.  Most people are not WEIRD , 2010, Nature.

[13]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[14]  Lisa M. Baker,et al.  False consensus effects for the 1992 Canadian referendum , 1995 .

[15]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Jay K. Dow A comparative spatial analysis of majoritarian and proportional elections , 2000 .

[17]  Robert S. Stawski,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (2nd Edition) , 2013 .

[18]  The Electoral Roots of America's Dysfunctional Government , 2013 .

[19]  Kevin Wallsten Political Blogs and the Bloggers Who Blog Them : Is the Political Blogosphere and Echo Chamber ? by , 2005 .

[20]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[21]  When Friends Lead Us Astray: Evidence for the Selective Exposure Hypothesis , 1988 .

[22]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Classification and quantitative judgement. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[23]  Brian Mullen,et al.  In-group-out-group differences in social projection , 1992 .

[24]  J. Graham,et al.  Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals Into Moral Communities , 2010, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[25]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[26]  John R. Chambers,et al.  Misperceptions in Intergroup Conflict , 2006, Psychological science.

[27]  Matthew Levendusky The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans , 2009 .

[28]  M. Brewer The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate? , 1999 .

[29]  N. Schofield,et al.  Support for Political Leaders , 2011 .

[30]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Personality Certainty and Politics: Increasing the Predictive Utility of Individual‐Difference Inventories , 2015 .

[31]  Larry M. Bartels Expectations and Preferences in Presidential Nominating Campaigns , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[32]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[33]  D. Keltner,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING? Revisionists and Traditionalists Choose an Introductory , 2022 .

[34]  S. Read,et al.  4. Parallel constraint satisfaction as a mechanism for cognitive consistency , 2012 .

[35]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning , 1986 .

[36]  Norman Miller,et al.  Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review , 1987 .

[37]  L. Ross,et al.  Actual versus assumed differences in construal: 'naive realism' in intergroup perception and conflict , 1995 .

[38]  D. C. Seyle,et al.  A house divided? The psychology of red and blue America. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[39]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential election , 2010 .

[40]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Is Polarization a Myth? , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[41]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Thad A. Brown,et al.  The Perception of Ideological Distance , 1992 .

[43]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Fitting Multilevel Models When Predictors and Group Effects Correlate , 2007 .

[44]  M. Cadinu,et al.  Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Jules Davidoff,et al.  The development of color categories in two languages: a longitudinal study. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction , 2002 .

[47]  S. Read,et al.  The redux of cognitive consistency theories: evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do , 2008 .

[49]  C M Judd,et al.  Accentuation and sensitization effects in the categorization of multifaceted stimuli. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Michael P. McDonald On the Overreport Bias of the National Election Study Turnout Rate , 2003, Political Analysis.

[51]  D. Rucinski The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[52]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Naï Realism and Affirmative Action: Adversaries are More Similar Than They Think , 2003 .

[53]  R. Montjoy,et al.  Overreporting voting: why it happens and why it matters. , 2001, Public opinion quarterly.

[54]  Abraham M. Rutchick,et al.  Seeing Red (and Blue): Effects of Electoral College Depictions on Political Group Perception , 2009 .

[55]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of the Contrast Effect and Its Implications for Intergroup Communication and the Indirect Assessment of Attitude. , 1972 .

[56]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Social identification effects in group polarization , 1986 .

[57]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  The Moral Stereotypes of Liberals and Conservatives: Exaggeration of Differences across the Political Spectrum , 2012, PloS one.

[58]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[59]  A. Gelman,et al.  Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. , 2008, AJS; American journal of sociology.

[60]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Quantitative judgement in social perception. , 1959, British journal of psychology.

[61]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Why Do White Americans Oppose Race-Targeted Policies? Clarifying the Impact of Symbolic Racism. , 2009, Political psychology.

[62]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches , 2006 .

[63]  John R. Chambers,et al.  Why Do I Hate Thee? Conflict Misperceptions and Intergroup Mistrust , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[64]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[65]  P. J. Conover,et al.  Projection and the Perception of Candidates' Issue Positions , 1982 .

[66]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Political Polarization in the American Public , 2008 .

[67]  D. O. Sears College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[68]  M. Fiorina,et al.  Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America , 2004 .

[69]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[70]  J. Krueger,et al.  Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[71]  Y. Mundlak On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data , 1978 .

[72]  John T. Jost,et al.  Why Are Conservatives Happier Than Liberals? , 2008, Psychological science.

[73]  C. Judd,et al.  Effects of Repeated Expressions on Attitude Extremity , 1992 .