SYMPOSIUM: ABJS CARL T. BRIGHTON WORKSHOP ON HIP PRESERVATION SURGERY MRI of Hip Cartilage

Background Accurate, reproducible, and noninvasive assessment of hip cartilage is clinically relevant and provides a means by which to assess the suitability of candidates for arthroscopic or open surgical procedures and the response to such interventions over time. Given the relatively thin cartilage of the hip and the complex spherical anatomy, however, accurately assessing the cartilage poses a challenge for traditional MRI techniques. Questions/Purposes We assessed the current status of imaging articular cartilage of the hip through a comprehensive review of recent literature. Methods We performed a literature review using PubMed. Topics included quantitative MRI, imaging of the hip cartilage and labrum, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, and osteoarthritis of the hip. Where Are We Now? With the use of high in-plane and through-plane resolution, reproducible assessment of hip cartilage and labrum is clinically feasible. More recent quantitative MR techniques also allow for noninvasive assessment of collagen orientation and proteoglycan content in articular cartilage, thus providing insight into early matrix degeneration. These techniques can be applied to cohorts at risk for osteoarthritis, helping to predict cartilage degeneration before symptoms progress and osteoarthritic changes are visible on radiographs. Where Do We Need to Go? Prospective longitudinal data registries are necessary for developing predictive models of osteoarthritis and subsequent joint failure to assess the results of surgical intervention and predict the timing of arthroplasty. How Do We Get There? By establishing more hip cartilage registries, a correlation can be made between subjective measures and morphologic MRI to assess the cartilage, labrum, bone, and synovial lining of the hip.

[1]  Seungbum Koo,et al.  Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  M. H. Öztürk,et al.  MR imaging of the acetabular labrum: a comparative study of both hips in 180 asymptomatic volunteers , 2001, European Radiology.

[3]  Bryan T. Kelly,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Improves Hip Kinematics , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  D. Blankenbaker,et al.  MR imaging of early hip joint degeneration. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[5]  J. Sayre,et al.  Cam-type FAI: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer? (Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38(9):855–62) , 2009, Skeletal Radiology.

[6]  M. Tannast,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  H. Martin,et al.  Imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome , 2005, Skeletal Radiology.

[9]  H. Potter,et al.  Noncontrast MR techniques and imaging of cartilage. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[10]  J. Hodler,et al.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  J. S. Keene,et al.  MR arthrography of the hip: comparison of IDEAL-SPGR volume sequence to standard MR sequences in the detection and grading of cartilage lesions. , 2011, Radiology.

[12]  J. W. Byrd,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Assessment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Arthrography, and Intra-Articular Injection in Hip Arthroscopy Patients , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  M. Recht,et al.  Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage , 2011, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[14]  Hollis G. Potter,et al.  High resolution noncontrast MRI of the hip , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  N. Sugano,et al.  Evaluation of cartilage matrix disorders by T2 relaxation time in patients with hip dysplasia. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[16]  T F Besier,et al.  Prediction of glycosaminoglycan content in human cartilage by age, T1ρ and T2 MRI. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[17]  T. Sampson,et al.  Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[18]  Cara L Lewis,et al.  Acetabular labral tears. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[19]  J. Sayre,et al.  Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer? , 2009, Skeletal Radiology.

[20]  W. Palmer Femoroacetabular impingement: caution is warranted in making imaging-based assumptions and diagnoses. , 2010, Radiology.

[21]  H. Potter,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[22]  Marco Zanetti,et al.  Cartilage lesions in the hip: diagnostic effectiveness of MR arthrography. , 2003, Radiology.

[23]  Martha L Gray,et al.  Assessment of early osteoarthritis in hip dysplasia with delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage to predict early failure of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  D. Burstein,et al.  Glycosaminoglycan in articular cartilage: in vivo assessment with delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MR imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[26]  R. Ganz,et al.  The hip. , 1982, Clinics in rheumatic diseases.