Commuting Inequality between Cars and Public Transit: The Case of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1990-2000

Equity in access to opportunities is increasingly recognised as an essential component of sustainable development and transport. This study presents a spatial and temporal examination of commuting inequality between cars and public transit in the San Francisco Bay Area. Results visualised in the maps show considerable inequality and temporal changes in job accessibility and commuting time between cars and public transit as well as among locations within the metropolitan area. Results from OLS and spatial regression models indicate that, in both 1990 and 2000, greater job accessibility was significantly associated with shorter commuting time for driving alone as well as for public transit, but the degree of this association was considerably greater for public transit than for driving alone. Urban and transport development that enhances mobility and accessibility for public transit relative to cars should be strongly encouraged.

[1]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives , 1997 .

[2]  Marie-Hélène Vandersmissen,et al.  Analyzing Changes in Urban Form and Commuting Time* , 2003 .

[3]  B Harris,et al.  ACCESSIBILITY: CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS , 2002 .

[4]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Living in Two Worlds: A Review of Home-to-Work Decisions , 2004 .

[5]  D. Levinson,et al.  The Rational Locator: Why Travel Times Have Remained Stable , 1994 .

[6]  M. White.  Urban Commuting Journeys Are Not "Wasteful" , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  D. Levinson,et al.  The rational locator reexamined: Are travel times still stable? , 2005 .

[8]  David L. Sjoquist,et al.  The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform , 1998 .

[9]  S. Raphael,et al.  Car ownership, employment, and earnings , 2002 .

[10]  A. Yeh,et al.  The Use of Modal Accessibility Gap as an Indicator for Sustainable Transport Development , 2000 .

[11]  Thomas W. Sanchez,et al.  The Connection Between Public Transit and Employment , 1999 .

[12]  Thomas W Sanchez,et al.  Residential location, transportation, and welfare‐to‐work in the United States: A case study of Milwaukee , 2005 .

[13]  J. Keith Ord,et al.  Spatial Processes Models and Applications , 1981 .

[14]  Harry H. Kelejian,et al.  A suggested method of estimation for spatial interdependent models with autocorrelated errors, and an application to a county expenditure model , 1993 .

[15]  B. Wee,et al.  Accessibility measures with competition , 2001 .

[16]  D. Levinson.  Accessibility and the Journey to Work , 1998 .

[17]  Q. Shen,et al.  Job Accessibility as an Indicator of Auto-Oriented Urban Structure: A Comparison of Boston and Los Angeles with Tokyo , 2006 .

[18]  Elizabeth Deakin.  Sustainable Transportation U.S. Dilemmas and European Experiences , 2002 .

[19]  Paul M. Ong,et al.  Car Ownership and Welfare-to-Work , 2001 .

[20]  Q. Shen,et al.  Location Characteristics of Inner-City Neighborhoods and Employment Accessibility of Low-Wage Workers , 1998 .

[21]  Paul M. Ong,et al.  Work and automobile ownership among welfare recipients , 1996 .

[22]  M. Horner.  Spatial Dimensions of Urban Commuting: A Review of Major Issues and Their Implications for Future Geographic Research* , 2004, The Professional Geographer.

[23]  K. Ord.  Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial Interaction , 1975 .

[24]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  Transit Mobility, Jobs Access and Low-income Labour Participation in US Metropolitan Areas , 2004 .

[25]  Elizabeth Deakin,et al.  Sustainable Development & Sustainable Transportation: Strategies for Economic Prosperity, Environmental Quality, and Equity , 2001 .

[26]  Barbara C. Richardson,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: ANALYSIS FRAMEWORKS , 2005 .

[27]  P. Gordon,et al.  The influence of metropolitan spatial structure on commuting time , 1989 .

[28]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[29]  K. Small,et al.  "Wasteful" Commuting: A Resolution , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  L. Anselin.  Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models , 1988 .

[31]  Mizuki Kawabata,et al.  Job Access and Employment among Low-Skilled Autoless Workers in US Metropolitan Areas , 2003 .

[32]  D. B. Hess.  Access to Employment for Adults in Poverty in the Buffalo-Niagara Region , 2005 .

[33]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Transportation as a Stimulus to Welfare-to-Work: Private Versus Public Mobility , 2000 .

[34]  Harry J. Holzer,et al.  The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: What Has the Evidence Shown? , 1991 .

[35]  Harry H. Kelejian,et al.  A Generalized Moments Estimator for the Autoregressive Parameter in a Spatial Model , 1999 .

[36]  Jiawen Yang.  Commuting Impacts of Spatial Decentralization: A Comparison of Atlanta and Boston , 2005 .

[37]  Brian D. Taylor,et al.  Spatial Mismatch or Automobile Mismatch? An Examination of Race, Residence and Commuting in US Metropolitan Areas , 1994 .

[38]  Paul M. Ong,et al.  Car Access and Welfare-To-Work , 2002 .

[39]  Martin Wachs,et al.  The Changing Commute: A Case-study of the Jobs-Housing Relationship over Time , 1993 .

[40]  Zhong-ren Peng,et al.  The Jobs-Housing Balance and Urban Commuting , 1997 .

[41]  M. Dijst,et al.  The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach , 2004 .

[42]  G. Giuliano.  Is Jobs-Housing Balance a Transportation Issue? , 1991 .

[43]  J. M. Morris,et al.  Accessibility indicators for transport planning , 1979 .

[44]  Q. Shen,et al.  Spatial and Social Dimensions of Commuting , 2000 .

[45]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Opportunities, Race, and Urban Location: The Influence of John Kain , 2004 .

[46]  Donald Bruce,et al.  The effects of car access on employment outcomes for welfare recipients , 2005 .

[47]  J. Weibull.  An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility , 1976 .

[48]  G. Stewart,et al.  Downtown population growth and commuting trips - recent experience in Toronto , 1991 .

[49]  Daniel A. Badoe,et al.  Transportation–land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling , 2000 .

[50]  Randall Crane,et al.  The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Interpretive Review , 2000 .

[51]  W. G. Hansen.  How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[52]  R. Cervero.  Jobs-Housing Balancing and Regional Mobility , 1989 .

[53]  Evelyn Blumenberg,et al.  En-gendering Effective Planning: Spatial Mismatch, Low-Income Women, and Transportation Policy , 2003 .

[54]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Travel by design : the influence of urban form on travel , 2001 .

[55]  Tsutomu Suzuki,et al.  Excess Commuting in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area: Measurement and Policy Simulations , 1995 .

[56]  Michael Manville,et al.  Beyond the Spatial Mismatch: Welfare Recipients and Transportation Policy , 2004 .

[57]  Mizuki Kawabata.  Job accessibility by travel mode in U. S. metropolitan areas , 2003 .

[58]  G. Pratt,et al.  Gender, Work and Space , 1995 .

[59]  M. Jun,et al.  THE COMMUTING PARADOX: EVIDENCE FROM THE TOP TWENTY , 1991 .

[60]  D. B. Hess,et al.  Measuring the Role of Transportation in Facilitating Welfare-to-Work Transition: Evidence from Three California Counties , 2003 .

[61]  John F. Kain,et al.  The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later , 1992 .

[62]  J. Kain.  Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization , 1968 .

[63]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[64]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Under the hood , 2002 .

[65]  M. Rossetti,et al.  JOURNEY TO WORK TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITS MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS, 1960-1990. FINAL REPORT , 1993 .

[66]  N A McGuckin,et al.  JOURNEY TO WORK IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITS MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS -- 1960 - 2000 , 2003 .

[67]  G. Giuliano,et al.  Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure? , 1993 .