Exploratory Behavior in Children

60 children representing equally two age groups (2nd and 6th graders) and three ability groups (IQs of 92–108, 112–128, and 132+) served as Ss in studies of the effects of stimulus characteristics on exploratory behavior and the effect of novelty on immediate and delayed recall. In Exp. 1, significant effects were obtained for complexity, abstractness, and incongruity but not ambiguity of tachistoscopically presented stimulus materials. Age affected exploration of incongruous and ambiguous but not complex and abstract materials. Ability level had no significant effects. In Exp. II, exploratory time and judged intensity of exploration were influenced by the characteristics of stimulus objects presented in an array for free exploration. Novelty facilitated exploration but neither age nor ability had a significant effect. In Exp. III, both immediate and delayed recall by the younger Ss were greater for objects they identified as “novel” but recall by the older Ss was somewhat greater for “not-novel” objects. Factor analysis of all the behavioral scores derived in these experiments along with scores from a creativity test indicated that the various measures of exploratory behavior and creativity used here were sampling different aspects of behavior and no one of such measures can be assumed to be an adequate index of exploratory behavior in general.

[1]  G. Mendel CHILDREN'S PERFERENCES FOR DIFFERING DEGREES OF NOVELTY. , 1965, Child development.

[2]  R. Penney,et al.  The Children's Reactive Curiosity Scale , 1964 .

[3]  A. B. Woodruff,et al.  Exploratory Behavior and Curiosity in Two Age and Ability Groups of Children , 1964 .

[4]  B. White,et al.  Visual Exploratory Behavior following Postnatal Handling of Human Infants , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  G. N. Cantor,et al.  OBSERVING BEHAVIOR IN CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS NOVELTY. , 1964, Child development.

[6]  K. Baettig Effect of Lesions on Spontaneous Alternation and Exploration Behavior , 1963 .

[7]  L. M. Cooper OPERANT BEHAVIOR AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS COMPLEXITY. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  G. N. Cantor,et al.  Observing behavior in preschool children as a function of stimulus complexity. , 1963, Child development.

[9]  Haywood Hc,et al.  EFFECTS OF EPINEPHRINE UPON NOVELTY PREFERENCE AND AROUSAL. , 1963 .

[10]  Warren Jm,et al.  Failure to find spontaneous alternation in chicks. , 1963 .

[11]  W. F. Hill,et al.  Spontaneous Alternation with and Without Reward in Hooded and Albino Rats , 1963 .

[12]  R. B. May,et al.  Stimulus Selection in Preschool Children under Conditions of Free Choice , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  C. D. Smock,et al.  Children's reactions to novelty: an experimental study of "curiosity motivation". , 1962, Child development.

[14]  D. Berlyne Uncertainty and epistemic curiosity. , 1962, British journal of psychology.

[15]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[16]  H. Harlow,et al.  The development of manipulatory responsiveness in the infant rhesus monkey. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[17]  D. Berlyne The influence of the albedo and complexity of stimuli on visual fixation in the human infant. , 1958, British journal of psychology.

[18]  M. Glanzer Curiosity, exploratory drive, and stimulus satiation. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  D. Berlyne The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  H. Harlow,et al.  Manipulatory motivation in the infant rhesus monkey. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[21]  Welker Wi Effects of age and experience on play and exploration of young chimpanzees. , 1956 .

[22]  H. Harlow,et al.  Object discrimination learned by monkeys on the basis of manipulation motives. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[23]  H. Harlow,et al.  Persistence of visual exploration in monkeys. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  H. Harlow,et al.  Learning motivated by a manipulation drive. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  W. N. Hayes,et al.  Failure to find spontaneous alternation in chicks. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[26]  J. M. Hunt,et al.  EFFECTS OF EPINEPHRINE UPON NOVELTY PREFERENCE AND AROUSAL. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[27]  W. Welker Effects of age and experience on play and exploration of young chimpanzees. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[28]  E. F. Lindquist,et al.  Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education , 1953 .