Investigating the roots of successful IT adoption processes - an empirical study exploring the shared awareness-knowledge of Directors of Nursing and Chief Information Officers

BackgroundThe majority of health IT adoption research focuses on the later stages of the IT adoption process: namely on the implementation phase. The first stage, however, which is defined as the knowledge-stage, remains widely unobserved. Following Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI) this paper presents a research framework to examine the possible lack of shared IT awareness-knowledge, i.e. an information gradient, of two crucial stakeholders, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Director of Nursing (DoN). This study shall answer the following research questions: (1.) Does this gradient exist? (2.) Which direction does it have? (3.) Are certain health IT (HIT) attributes associated with a potential gradient? (4.) Which determinants of diffusion go along with this gradient?MethodResults of two surveys that focused on the topic “IT support of clinical workflows” from the viewpoint of CIOs and DoNs with corresponding datasets from 75 hospitals were used in a secondary data analysis. The gradient was operationalised by measuring the disagreement of CIOs and DoNs on the availability and implementation status of 29 IT functions. HIT attributes tested were relevance and market penetration of the IT functions, determinants of diffusion were inter-professional leadership and IT service density.ResultsThe analysis revealed a significant disagreement on the availability of 9 out of 29 HIT functions. In 23 HIT functions, the CIOs reported a higher implementation status than the DoNs, which pointed to a trend for a unidirectional gradient. The disagreement was significantly lower when the relevance of the IT function was high. Both determinants of diffusion correlated significantly negative with the degree of disagreement.ConclusionThis is the first study to empirically examine shared awareness-knowledge of two IT-stakeholders that are crucial for triggering IT adoption on the frontline level in hospitals. It could be shown that a gradient and thus a lack of shared awareness-knowledge existed and was associated with certain factors. In conclusion, hospitals should implement improved cooperation between IT staff and clinicians and IT service density when establishing the prerequisites for successful IT adoption processes.

[1]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Newton,et al.  Hierarchies and cliques in the social networks of health care professionals: implications for the design of dissemination strategies. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[3]  Robert C Geibert,et al.  Using Diffusion of Innovation Concepts to Enhance Implementation of an Electronic Health Record to Support Evidence‐based Practice , 2006, Nursing administration quarterly.

[4]  Melissa M. Honour,et al.  Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. , 2004, Health affairs.

[5]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Joan S. Ash,et al.  Implementing computerized physician order entry: the importance of special people , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[8]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[9]  Guy Paré,et al.  Key IT Management Issues in Canadian Hospitals: A Delphi Study , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Robert G Badgett,et al.  Comment on "Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations". , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[11]  Daniel Shine,et al.  Guided ordering: Clinician interactions with complex order-sets , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  IT Governance and Types of IT Decision Makers in German Hospitals , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[13]  I. England,et al.  Information technology adoption in health care: when organisations and technology collide. , 2000, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[14]  Alfred Winter,et al.  Health information systems : architectures and strategies , 2011 .

[15]  J. Spetz Information Technology Implementation in a Rural Hospital: A Cautionary Tale , 2009, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[16]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Successful IS innovation: the contingent contributions of innovation characteristics and implementation process , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Stelios Daskalakis,et al.  How do Nursing Students Perceive the Notion of EHR? an Empirical Investigation , 2011, MIE.

[18]  Ursula Hübner,et al.  Characteristics of German Hospitals Adopting Health IT Systems - Results from an Empirical Study , 2011, MIE.

[19]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  White Paper: Health IT Success and Failure: Recommendations from Literature and an AMIA Workshop , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead , 2010 .

[21]  Guy Paré,et al.  Knowledge barriers to PACS adoption and implementation in hospitals , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  Pieter M. A. Ribbers,et al.  Designing information technology governance processes: diagnosing contemporary practices and competing theories , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Diffusion of Innovation , 2015 .

[24]  G. Robert,et al.  Adopting and assimilating new non-pharmaceutical technologies into health care: A systematic review , 2010, Journal of health services research & policy.

[25]  Charo Rodríguez,et al.  Understanding managerial behaviour during initial steps of a clinical information system adoption , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[26]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Drivers and Barriers in Health IT Adoption , 2012, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[27]  David W. Bates,et al.  EHR adoption across China's tertiary hospitals: A cross-sectional observational study , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[28]  Guy Paré,et al.  Key IT management issues in hospitals: Results of a Delphi study in Canada , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  Pierre Frémont,et al.  Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[30]  G. Alexander,et al.  CAH to CAH: EHR implementation advice to critical access hospitals from peer experts and other key informants. , 2014, Applied clinical informatics.

[31]  Gilad J. Kuperman,et al.  Synthesis of Research Paper: A Consensus Statement on Considerations for a Successful CPOE Implementation , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[32]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  N. Staggers,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Designs of Clinical Technology: Findings and Recommendations for Future Research , 2009, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[34]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Best Practices in EMR Implementation: A Systematic Review , 2006, AMIA.

[35]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: An interpretative review , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[36]  Wallace E. Carroll,et al.  The Diffusion and Assimilation of Information Technology Innovations , 2001 .

[37]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  IT adoption of clinical information systems in Austrian and German hospitals: results of a comparative survey with a focus on nursing , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[38]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making It-adoption and the Interaction of Task, Technology and Individuals: a Fit Framework and a Case Study , 2022 .

[39]  Farah Magrabi,et al.  The impact of clinical leadership on health information technology adoption: Systematic review , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.