Effect of an artificial neural network on radiologists' performance in the differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease using chest radiographs.

OBJECTIVE We developed a new method to distinguish between various interstitial lung diseases that uses an artificial neural network. This network is based on features extracted from chest radiographs and clinical parameters. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of the output from the artificial neural network on radiologists' diagnostic accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The artificial neural network was designed to differentiate among 11 interstitial lung diseases using 10 clinical parameters and 16 radiologic findings. Thirty-three clinical cases (three cases for each lung disease) were selected. In the observer test, chest radiographs were viewed by eight radiologists (four attending physicians and four residents) with and without network output, which indicated the likelihood of each of the 11 possible diagnoses in each case. The radiologists' performance in distinguishing among the 11 interstitial lung diseases was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with a continuous rating scale. RESULTS When chest radiographs were viewed in conjunction with network output, a statistically significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy was achieved (p < .0001). The average area under the ROC curve was .826 without network output and .911 with network output. CONCLUSION An artificial neural network can provide a useful "second opinion" to assist radiologists in the differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease using chest radiographs.

[1]  C. Henschke,et al.  Neural networks for the analysis of small pulmonary nodules. , 1997, Clinical imaging.

[2]  C J Vyborny,et al.  Artificial neural networks in chest radiography: application to the differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[3]  K Doi,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[4]  M Thelen,et al.  Automatic detection and quantification of ground-glass opacities on high-resolution CT using multiple neural networks: comparison with a density mask. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Artificial neural networks in chest radiographs: detection and characterization of interstitial lung disease , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[6]  J. Gurney,et al.  Solitary pulmonary nodules: determining the likelihood of malignancy with neural network analysis. , 1995, Radiology.

[7]  G. W. Gross,et al.  Neural networks in radiologic diagnosis. II. Interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[8]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. , 1992, Medical physics.

[9]  K Nakamura,et al.  Computerized analysis of the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with use of artificial neural networks. , 2000, Radiology.

[10]  Y. Wu,et al.  Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 1993, Radiology.

[11]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Automatic detection of ground glass opacities on lung HRCT using multiple neural networks , 1997, European Radiology.

[12]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[14]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[15]  K. Doi,et al.  Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. , 1996, Radiology.