The Function of Bilateral Odor Arrival Time Differences in Olfactory Orientation of Sharks

The direction of an odor signal source can be estimated from bilateral differences in signal intensity and/or arrival time. The best-known examples of the use of arrival time differences are in acoustic orientation. For chemoreception, animals are believed to orient by comparing bilateral odor concentration differences, turning toward higher concentrations. However, time differences should not be ignored, because odor plumes show chaotic intermittency, with the concentration variance several orders of magnitude greater than the concentration mean. We presented a small shark species, Mustelus canis, with carefully timed and measured odor pulses directly into their nares. They turned toward the side stimulated first, even with delayed pulses of higher concentration. This is the first conclusive evidence that under seminatural conditions and without training, bilateral time differences trump odor concentration differences. This response would steer the shark into an odor patch each time and thereby enhance its contact with the plume, i.e., a stream of patches. Animals with more widely spaced nares would be able to resolve smaller angles of attack at higher swimming speeds, a feature that may have contributed to the evolution of hammerhead sharks. This constitutes a novel steering algorithm for tracking odor plumes.

[1]  Adam P. Summers,et al.  Response of the hammerhead shark olfactory epithelium to amino acid stimuli , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  Frank W. Grasso,et al.  Biomimetic robot lobster performs chemo-orientation in turbulence using a pair of spatially separated sensors: Progress and challenges , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  J. Atema,et al.  Temporal resolution in olfaction: stimulus integration time of lobster chemoreceptor cells , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  Peter B. Johnsen,et al.  Behavioral responses of bonnethead sharks (Sphyrna tiburo) to controlled olfactory stimulation , 1985 .

[5]  J. Bardach,et al.  Orientation by Taste in Fish of the Genus Ictalurus , 1967, Science.

[6]  P. Gilbert,et al.  Sharks, Skates, and Rays , 1967 .

[7]  R. Sheldon The sense of smell in Selachians , 1911 .

[8]  R F Mathewson,et al.  Klinotaxis and rheotaxis in orientation of sharks toward chemical stimuli. , 1972, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. A, Comparative physiology.

[9]  Perry W. Gilbert,et al.  Sharks and survival , 1966 .

[10]  R. Mathewson,et al.  CHEMOSENSORY ORIENTATION IN SHARKS * , 1971, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Gruber,et al.  Functional morphology of the olfactory organ of two carcharhinid shark species , 1987 .

[12]  L. Compagno,et al.  Sharks of the world :an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date , 1984 .

[13]  A. Hasler CHAPTER II: PART 3 – THE SENSE ORGANS: OLFACTORY AND GUSTATORY SENSES OF FISHES , 1957 .

[14]  J Atema,et al.  Structures and functions of the sense of taste in the catfish (Ictalurus natalis). , 1971, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[15]  Ross Cotton,et al.  Functional morphology of the nasal region of a hammerhead shark. , 2010, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[16]  Ronald L. Woodfin,et al.  Trace chemical sensing of explosives , 2007 .

[17]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Sound-Localization Experiments with Barn Owls in Virtual Space: Influence of Interaural Time Difference on Head-Turning Behavior , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[18]  Donald R. Webster Structure of Turbulent Chemical Plumes , 2006 .

[19]  William J. Bell,et al.  Chemical Ecology of Insects , 1985, Springer US.

[20]  R. Cardé,et al.  Fine-scale structure of pheromone plumes modulates upwind orientation of flying moths , 1994, Nature.

[21]  Adam P. Summers,et al.  Olfactory morphology of carcharhinid and sphyrnid sharks: Does the cephalofoil confer a sensory advantage? , 2005, Journal of morphology.

[22]  David H. Evans,et al.  The Physiology of Fishes , 1994 .

[23]  Donald R. Webster,et al.  Chemosensory guidance cues in a turbulent chemical odor plume , 2001 .

[24]  H. Breucker,et al.  Functional Morphology of the Olfactory Organs in the Spiny Dogfish (Squalus acanthias L.) and the Small‐spotted Catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula (L.)) , 1986 .

[25]  M. Knaden,et al.  Do desert ants smell the scenery in stereo? , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  T. Baker,et al.  Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Jelle Atema,et al.  Sharks need the lateral line to locate odor sources: rheotaxis and eddy chemotaxis , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  C. Gilbert A Revision of the Hammerhead Sharks (Family Sphyrnidae) , 1967 .

[29]  J Atema,et al.  Eddy Chemotaxis and Odor Landscapes: Exploration of Nature With Animal Sensors. , 1996, The Biological bulletin.

[30]  Jelle Atema,et al.  Chemical orientation of lobsters, homarus americanus, in turbulent odor plumes , 1991, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[31]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .