Transferring green building technologies from academic research institutes to building enterprises in the development of urban green building: A stochastic differential game approach

Abstract This paper presents a stochastic differential game of green building technologies (GBTs) transfer from academic research institutes to building enterprises in the building enterprises-academic research institutes collaborative innovation (BACI) system. Some random interference factors, for example the uncertain external environment and the mood of decision makers, are considered into three models which are Nash non-cooperative game model, Stacklberg master-slave game model and cooperative game model. The equilibrium strategies of building enterprises and academic research institutes are studied and discussed by using feedback control. The equilibrium results showed that the effort level of academic research institutes and building enterprises is proportional to the government subsidy of GBTs innovation, and the level of credit support and tax relief is proportional to the effort level of academic research institutes. The government subsidy of GBTs innovation is a long-term incentive mechanism which can promote GBTs transfer from academic research institutes to building enterprises in the BACI system. The Pareto optimality of GBTs transfer system can be reached under a cooperative game model. To reach the Pareto optimality, the scope of revenue distribution coefficient is given by analysis of revenue distribution mechanism. This study will contribute to the GBTs transfer from academic research institutes to building enterprises by providing some incentive mechanisms and the scope of revenue distribution coefficient. The findings from this study also adds to theoretical basis of incentive mechanisms, random factors, profit distribution and contract design for building enterprises and academic research institutes to make scientific decisions.

[1]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption : the United States green building experts' perspectives , 2017 .

[2]  Valentinas Podvezko Book Review. Game Theory in Building Technology and Management , 2008 .

[3]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Drivers for implementing green building technologies : an international survey of experts , 2017 .

[4]  Xu Jian-zhon,et al.  Low-carbon Technology Innovation Diffusion under Environmental Regulation——Evolutionary Game Analysis Based on Prospect Theory , 2015 .

[5]  Calin S. Vac,et al.  Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer in a Romanian University , 2017 .

[6]  Yeong Liang Sim,et al.  Green building technology initiatives to achieve construction quality and environmental sustainability in the construction industry in Malaysia , 2015 .

[7]  D. Ockwell,et al.  Lessons from China: building technological capabilities for low carbon technology transfer and development , 2015, Climatic Change.

[8]  Ahmed Al-Salaymeh,et al.  Energy audit, an approach to apply the concept of green building for a building in Jordan , 2015 .

[9]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Green strategy for gaining competitive advantage in housing development: a China study , 2011 .

[10]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Barriers to Implement Green Strategy in the Process of Developing Real Estate Projects , 2011 .

[11]  H. Rush,et al.  Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer , 1995 .

[12]  A. Chan,et al.  Strategies for Promoting Green Building Technologies Adoption in the Construction Industry—An International Study , 2017 .

[13]  Ngo Van Long,et al.  A Survey Of Dynamic Games In Economics , 2010 .

[14]  Caroline J. Mackley,et al.  Knowledge transfer and Green Building Challenge , 2001 .

[15]  Andrew P. McCoy,et al.  Diffusion of green building technologies in new housing construction , 2015 .

[16]  G. Erickson,et al.  Empirical analysis of closed-loop duopoly advertising strategies , 1992 .

[17]  Zhong Bao Qin,et al.  Research on the Application of Green Technology to Leather Shoes in their Life Cycle , 2011 .

[18]  Jin Si,et al.  Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: A review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method , 2016 .

[19]  Anna Lewandowska,et al.  Materials composition or energy characteristic – What is more important in environmental life cycle of buildings? , 2014 .

[20]  Bon-Gang Hwang,et al.  Green commercial building projects in Singapore: Critical risk factors and mitigation measures , 2017 .

[21]  Shih-Mo Lin,et al.  Assessment of a green credit policy aimed at energy-intensive industries in China based on a financial CGE model , 2017 .

[22]  Kumar Neeraj Jha,et al.  Benchmarking green building attributes to achieve cost effectiveness using a data envelopment analysis , 2017 .

[23]  Olivier Menoukeu Pamen,et al.  Optimal Control for Stochastic Delay Systems Under Model Uncertainty: A Stochastic Differential Game Approach , 2015, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[24]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Driving forces for green building technologies adoption in the construction industry: Ghanaian perspective , 2017 .

[25]  Bakti Hasan Basri,et al.  A game theoretic model of green technology rivalry , 2013 .

[26]  Andrew Hay,et al.  A Study on the Centre of Excellence in Sustainable Building Technologies and Renewable Energy Conservation , 2010 .

[27]  Xueying Hong,et al.  Design of effective subsidy policy to develop green buildings: from the perspective of policy benefit , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[28]  Frédéric Koessler Strategic knowledge sharing in Bayesian games , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[29]  Timothy Lenoir,et al.  Building Technology Transfer within Research Universities: Inventing the entrepreneurial university: Stanford and the co-evolution of Silicon Valley , 2014 .

[30]  Tao Yan,et al.  Research on social and humanistic needs in planning and construction of green buildings , 2014 .

[31]  Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem,et al.  Developing a green-building design approach by selective use of systems and techniques , 2016 .