Acceptance issues in metrics program implementation

Process improvement initiatives such as metrics programs have a high failure rate during their assimilation in a software organization. Lack of attention to social issues and lack of communication are some of the factors affecting their acceptance. Social Psychology includes study of such acceptance issues in the adoption of technology in the workplace. Although metrics implementations are often more intrusive and their benefits are indirect compared to workplace technology in general, both are introduced for similar reasons and induce organizational change. Therefore, we apply technology adoption concepts to metrics program implementation to develop a predictive model that takes as input organizational culture, practitioner mindset, and the nature of the metrics program. Our model relates these inputs to the likelihood of a successful metrics program implementation and to areas that may need improvement. This paper includes the results of a pilot study. The predictor variables ease of use, usefulness, control, and attitude were significantly correlated with the dependent variable, the respondent's intention to perform metrics activities

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[2]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[3]  D. Ross Jeffery,et al.  The challenge of introducing a new software cost estimation technology into a small software organisation , 2004, 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference. Proceedings..

[4]  D. Ross Jeffery,et al.  A framework for evaluation and prediction of metrics program success , 1993, [1993] Proceedings First International Software Metrics Symposium.

[5]  Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al.  Lessons learned in building a corporate metrics program , 1993, IEEE Software.

[6]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  Ryan E Rhodes,et al.  Investigating multiple components of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived control: an examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the exercise domain. , 2003, The British journal of social psychology.

[8]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Lessons from implementing a software metrics program , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al.  Status Report on Software Measurement , 1997, IEEE Softw..

[10]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of Methodologies: A Comparison of Five Theoretical Models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[11]  I. Ajzen Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. , 2002 .

[12]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  The impact of institutional forces on software metrics programs , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[13]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Conceptual simplicity meets organizational complexity: case study of a corporate metrics program , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[14]  Michael Daskalantonakis,et al.  A Practical View of Software Measurement and Implementation Experiences Within Motorola , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[15]  Ray Offen,et al.  Establishing Software Measurement Programs , 1997, IEEE Softw..

[16]  David R. Barstow,et al.  Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering , 1978, ICSE.

[17]  Lionel C. Briand,et al.  Practical guidelines for measurement-based process improvement , 1996, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[18]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  Measurement Programs in Software Development: Determinants of Success , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[19]  Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al.  Understanding and improving technology transfer in software engineering , 1999, J. Syst. Softw..

[20]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[21]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[22]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[23]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[24]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Toward an information systems development acceptance model: the case of object-oriented systems development , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[26]  Norman E. Fenton,et al.  Implementing Effective Software Metrics Programs , 1997, IEEE Softw..

[27]  Anita D. Carleton,et al.  Case studies of software-process-improvement measurement , 1994, Computer.

[28]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Hans van Vliet,et al.  Towards mature measurement programs , 1998, Proceedings of the Second Euromicro Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering.

[30]  이훈,et al.  지각된 유용성(Perceived Usefulness)의 영향분석 , 2004 .