Modal‐based structural damage identification by minimum constitutive relation error and sparse regularization

This paper presents a novel sparse-regularized minimum constitutive relation error (minCRE) approach for structural damage identification with modal data. In this approach, the inverse identification problem is treated as a nonlinear optimization problem whose objective function is just the constitutive relation error (CRE). To circumvent the ill-posedness of the inverse problem which is caused by use of the possibly insufficient modal data and enhance the robustness of the identification process, a sparse regularization is introduced where a sparse (or l1-norm) regularization term is added to the original CRE function. In regard to the minimum solution of the sparse-regularized CRE objective function, a two-step substitution algorithm is established. The attractive feature of the present damage identification approach is that no sensitivity analysis is involved herein and the additional introduction of the sparse regularization term introduces little computational complexity. The approach is applied to damage identification of one or two-dimensional beam structures with experimental or simulated modal data. Results show that the sparse regularization indeed improves the effectiveness and robustness of the min-CRE approach under measurement noises and initial model errors, even in the case of large damages.

[1]  Pierre Feissel,et al.  Modified constitutive relation error identification strategy for transient dynamics with corrupted data : the elastic case , 2007 .

[2]  Norris Stubbs,et al.  Damage identification in beam-type structures: frequency-based method vs mode-shape-based method , 2003 .

[3]  Gu-Quan Song,et al.  Structural damage identification by extended Kalman filter with L1-norm regularization scheme , 2017 .

[4]  Gilles Lubineau,et al.  A Dissipation Gap Method for full‐field measurement‐based identification of elasto‐plastic material parameters , 2012 .

[5]  Mee Young Park,et al.  L1‐regularization path algorithm for generalized linear models , 2007 .

[6]  Wei Fan,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[7]  Than Soe Maung,et al.  Regularised finite element model updating using measured incomplete modal data , 2014 .

[8]  F. Hemez,et al.  Updating finite element dynamic models using an element-by-element sensitivity methodology , 1993 .

[9]  S. Law,et al.  Structural damage localization from modal strain energy change , 1998 .

[10]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[11]  Branislav Titurus,et al.  Regularization in model updating , 2008 .

[12]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Minimum constitutive relation error based static identification of beams using force method , 2017 .

[13]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Structural damage identification via a combination of blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification , 2014 .

[14]  Stéphane Pagano,et al.  Identification of Mechanical Properties by Displacement Field Measurement: A Variational Approach , 2003 .

[15]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Output-only modal identification with limited sensors using sparse component analysis , 2013 .

[16]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ1 Minimization , 2007, 0711.1612.

[17]  C. D. Zhang,et al.  Comparative studies on damage identification with Tikhonov regularization and sparse regularization , 2016 .

[18]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Application of the strain energy damage detection method to plate-like structures , 1999 .

[19]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Output-only modal identification by compressed sensing: Non-uniform low-rate random sampling , 2015 .

[20]  S. Law,et al.  Structural Damage Detection from Modal Strain Energy Change , 2000 .

[21]  Marc Bonnet,et al.  Inverse problems in elasticity , 2005 .

[22]  H. Nkansah Least squares optimization with L1-norm regularization , 2017 .

[23]  Keith Hjelmstad,et al.  CRACK IDENTIFICATION IN A CANTILEVER BEAM FROM MODAL RESPONSE , 1996 .

[24]  M. Saiidi,et al.  PRESTRESS FORCE EFFECT ON VIBRATION FREQUENCY OF CONCRETE BRIDGES. TECHNICAL NOTE , 1994 .

[25]  Robert Y. Liang,et al.  Theoretical study of crack-induced eigenfrequency changes on beam structures , 1992 .

[26]  Yongchao Yang,et al.  Modeling and harnessing sparse and low‐rank data structure: a new paradigm for structural dynamics, identification, damage detection, and health monitoring , 2017 .

[27]  Marc Bonnet,et al.  Large Scale Parameter Estimation Problems in Frequency-Domain Elastodynamics Using an Error in Constitutive Equation Functional. , 2013, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[28]  B. Weber,et al.  Structural damage detection using nonlinear parameter identification with Tikhonov regularization , 2007 .

[29]  Jean-Jacques Sinou,et al.  Robust damage assessment of multiple cracks based on the Frequency Response Function and the Constitutive Relation Error updating method , 2008 .

[30]  Eric Florentin,et al.  Using constitutive equation gap method for identification of elastic material parameters: technical insights and illustrations , 2011 .

[31]  Pierre Ladevèze,et al.  Error Estimate Procedure in the Finite Element Method and Applications , 1983 .

[32]  Ning Hu,et al.  Damage assessment of structures using modal test data , 2001 .

[33]  Nikos A. Aspragathos,et al.  Identification of crack location and magnitude in a cantilever beam from the vibration modes , 1990 .

[34]  Ying Wang,et al.  Damage Identification Scheme Based on Compressive Sensing , 2015, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[35]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  An improved modal strain energy method for structural damagedetection, 2D simulation , 2015 .